Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,137 posts)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:20 PM Apr 2016

*BREAKING: NEW YORK JUDGE RULES FOR VOTERS In Last Minute Primary Case, April 19

New York began disenfranchising millions of its citizens due to a draconian voter registration law it was uncovered recently. As a result, an emergency lawsuit (CV-16 1892) was filed in Federal District Court Monday by Election Justice USA to enable both independents and newly registered Democrats to vote in the primary. This law resulted in many people whom have been registered as Democrats were scrubbed from voter rolls without sufficient notice. The loss was so large in one borough of New York City that Mayor deBlasio raised the issue in an interview with WYNC:

"This number surprises me. I admit that Brooklyn has had a lot of transient population – that’s obvious. Lot of people moving in, lot of people moving out. That might account for some of it. But I’m confused since so many people have moved in, that the number would move that much in the negative direction."

On top of these problems, reports are coming in of New York voters facing broken and malfunctioning machines, resulting in long lines. Add to it the usual partisan conflicts in a hotly contested primary, nobody can claim that New York’s primary is not important.

Now the court has declined to dismiss the case, leaving the issue open for people to now petition for their vote to be accepted. This authorizes those who were denied access to the polls to cast their vote using a provisional ballot, due to the late stage of this decision. The judge also ruled that all county election offices must appear before the court within 60 days to defend their enrollment process. This order does not, however, give people who choose not to join a particular political party the opportunity to participate, leaving it only a partial answer to the issue.

For a more permanent solution, the legislature in Albany is currently working on Assembly Bill A9661, which would turn the New York primary into a full open primary.

The nature of democracy is the principle of one person, one vote. However, as Tom Stoppard put it in his play “Jumpers”, “It’s not the voting that’s democracy; it’s the counting.” By manipulating the numbers, by disenfranchising voters be it through closed primaries, voter ID laws or scrubbing election rolls, it undermines the principles upon which our nation was founded. The decision to enable people to vote in New York’s primary today is another victory for the forces of democracy.

http://reverbpress.com/politics/battlegrounds/breaking-new-york-judge-rules-voters-primary-case/
---------------
**This is a big win for all New York voters! This means those who legitimately should have been allowed to vote will be able to submit affidavit ballots and have their votes count!**

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*BREAKING: NEW YORK JUDGE RULES FOR VOTERS In Last Minute Primary Case, April 19 (Original Post) appalachiablue Apr 2016 OP
"declining to dismiss" is not a finding for the plaintiffs! geek tragedy Apr 2016 #1
It is a procedural decision that benefits the Plaintiffs. elleng Apr 2016 #2
by delaying any action until after the election geek tragedy Apr 2016 #4
Absolutely. It means the PLantiffs Benefit and Provisional Ballots Can Be Used to Vote. appalachiablue Apr 2016 #5
"Authorizes those who were denied access to the polls to cast their vote using a provisional ballot" highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #3
Yes Indeed! appalachiablue Apr 2016 #6
Eve kick appalachiablue Apr 2016 #7
Truly... PyaarRevolution Apr 2016 #8
For sure, US voting and elections are a mess, but this offers some good news... appalachiablue Apr 2016 #9
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. "declining to dismiss" is not a finding for the plaintiffs!
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:22 PM
Apr 2016

ugh, does this really need to be explained to people.

The judge kicked the can past the date of the primary, making it moot. Independents won't get to vote in the primary.

elleng

(130,918 posts)
2. It is a procedural decision that benefits the Plaintiffs.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:26 PM
Apr 2016

'leaving the issue open for people to now petition for their vote to be accepted. This authorizes those who were denied access to the polls to cast their vote using a provisional ballot.'

Does this really need to be explained to you?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. by delaying any action until after the election
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:28 PM
Apr 2016

has taken place?

the lawsuit didn't change anything for anyone.

Independents will not be allowed to participate, and Democrats with messed up voter registration records will be allowed to cast affidavit ballots, as they would have been otherwise.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
3. "Authorizes those who were denied access to the polls to cast their vote using a provisional ballot"
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:26 PM
Apr 2016

PLEASE DO!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»*BREAKING: NEW YORK JUDGE...