Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHardball: Matthews wants Warren to put her reputation on the line vouching for Clinton?
Will she put her reputation on the line to defend the Clinton Foundation, and Speaking Fees and Consulting Fees made from parties with business before the State Dept?
Do you think she will do that?
I think it would damage Warren's reputation a hell of a lot more than it will help the Clintons.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 461 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hardball: Matthews wants Warren to put her reputation on the line vouching for Clinton? (Original Post)
Skwmom
Apr 2016
OP
IMHO, if Warren was going to endorse Hillary, she would have done so long ago.
southerncrone
Apr 2016
#3
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)1. It would be nice, but Warren will not declare support until it is over.
onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)2. Fuck Matthews, he's a dumb ass
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)3. IMHO, if Warren was going to endorse Hillary, she would have done so long ago.
Think about Warren's stances & who else more closely agrees w/those.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)4. Warren will be campaigning for Hillary in the general. nt
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)5. Of course, she didn't endorse Sanders when it would have mattered. She's a politician.
She supported removing ACA funding tax on medical device manufacturers, because many are in her state.
benny05
(5,322 posts)6. There's No Point Getting Upset with Sen Warren
She's fighting the good fights for all of us!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)7. Her stance on device tax would be called corporatist by say Clinton.