Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:10 PM Apr 2016

Politico: How Bernie lost New York

NEW YORK — Bernie Sanders had just arrived at the rally, and missed the incendiary remark entirely. Many on the senator’s campaign had never even heard of Dr. Paul Song, the speaker who had just commandeered news coverage of a massive Washington Square rally in New York by referring to “corporate Democratic whores.”

Nevertheless, by the next morning, the campaign was forced into full scramble mode. Cable coverage of the 27,000-person rally was eclipsed by reporting on the furor surrounding the comment, requiring a Sanders response. After first resisting an apology, the campaign settled on disavowing the remark with a tweet.

Another day, another lost news cycle.

In New York, Sanders finally hit the wall, his winning streak ended by a daily pummeling that forced him on the defensive and erased the developing Comeback Kid narrative. The tabloids dealt him punishing hit after punishing hit. The Democratic establishment, most of it in Clinton’s camp, piled on harder than the Sanders campaign expected. Caught up in one distraction after another – the quarrel over debate details, the back and forth with Clinton over her qualifications, a trip to the Vatican in the run-up to the election – Sanders never gained his footing, or even came close to pulling off the upset victory he once predicted with frequency.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/how-bernie-lost-new-york-222173

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politico: How Bernie lost New York (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2016 OP
That's odd, I thought it was something else. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #1
How many closed Caucuses did you complain about Sanders winning? brooklynite Apr 2016 #3
Really, well you can check my history... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #6
Check your history? You've been here 3 weeks. George II Apr 2016 #9
Wow sick burn! northernsouthern Apr 2016 #12
They don't know any life outside this website. GoldenThunder Apr 2016 #23
Welcome to DU. Apologies for the Clinton supporters that are unwelcoming to new Democrats, here. nt w4rma Apr 2016 #27
Thank you. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #30
Washington is a caucus state that had 5% of the electorate voting. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #13
Yeah, we have a double system. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #14
Caucuses inherently limit turnout as compared to a primary mythology Apr 2016 #25
please read my posts, WA does not limit. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #32
WA has surrogate ballots for those who have to work, JimDandy Apr 2016 #51
Standing Ovation Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #26
Yes, he was finally vetted. Tonight was the result. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #2
Yep... blue neen Apr 2016 #50
His huge rallies don't translate into votes? book_worm Apr 2016 #4
They mention the Vatican trip as a distraction (above) and in the article -- Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #5
She also outdebated him. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #7
She won the debate. grossproffit Apr 2016 #8
But he won the Rome (New York) vote. George II Apr 2016 #11
That 27000 person rally was reported by the NYPD, who know these things was only 11000. George II Apr 2016 #10
Yes, the top 1% funded corporate media noise machine turned up the noise full blast. mhatrw Apr 2016 #15
So do Republicans nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #18
Indeed he did - he cleaned up! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #28
Cheating by the DNC AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #16
What cheating? fun n serious Apr 2016 #36
Strange how Paul Song profusely praised Clinton right before that comment and that all of his family Skwmom Apr 2016 #17
You think Paul Song was a plant? nt Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #31
If you can make it here ... nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #19
He lost because he promoted anti-capitalism and anti-Zionism, ericson00 Apr 2016 #20
NOT anti-capitalism Armstead Apr 2016 #24
The lies and distortion by Clintons buddy who owns the daily news and was continuously repeated by Skwmom Apr 2016 #21
Amazing how fraud/voter disenfranchisement does not make the list. Skwmom Apr 2016 #22
he lost because new yorkers like HRC more. winning NY was always a pipe dream La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #29
Yes. The same way Wall Street likes to hear Hillary speak more than Bernie. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #42
yes, not her fault. she is the senator from NY, of course she has ties La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #43
Or more to the point, blacks and latinos voted for Clinton...as they planned to all along... Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #33
didn't see you guys have meltdowns over closed caucuses though. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #35
Frankly caucuses are stupid. But the whole system is stupid. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #37
i actually think the superdelegates are fine, in case of a trump like scenario La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #38
Revamp the whole system and get dirty money out of it. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #39
i think NY state will take a second look about it's voting issues La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #40
I highly doubt it.. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #56
Sanders was never going to win NY, just like Hillary was not going to win VT. Beacool Apr 2016 #34
Dr. Paul Song...“corporate Democratic whores.” workinclasszero Apr 2016 #41
And they keep on killing him day by day. Changed many voters minds about Bernie. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #44
He barely had a chance to start with, and that AWFUL editorial interview Lucinda Apr 2016 #45
Sanders flamed out in NY bigtime! workinclasszero Apr 2016 #46
It truly was a mess of epic proportions. Lucinda Apr 2016 #47
Yes....Bernie's New York Götterdämmerung workinclasszero Apr 2016 #48
he was never going to win New York, the best would have been to try to make it as close as possible JI7 Apr 2016 #49
Sanders negative attacks on Clinton backfired Gothmog Apr 2016 #52
Bernie lost because it was a closed primary. It's not rocket science. Vinca Apr 2016 #53
And those closed caucuses? brooklynite Apr 2016 #55
Not ready for prime time nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #54
 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
1. That's odd, I thought it was something else.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:12 PM
Apr 2016

Closed primary, no one could switch since last year. But hey great victory in the boy's club you got there.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
6. Really, well you can check my history...
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:21 PM
Apr 2016

...but if you want me to go over it again Washington is not closed, we are the most open and possibly one of the easiest to vote on, he won big here, way more than she won in NY. People can vote here on election day, does not matter what party you are in. We can vote by mail in. She lost here because we are open. I HATE all closed versions, I have complained about them all! How are you not able to grasp that in a proportional election with a candidate that crushes her in the independent votes I would not want every election open? Think about it! He wins in high turn out and open...she wins in closed and lower. When they said turn out was not up to par on 2008 and that this was closed I knew he lost.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
12. Wow sick burn!
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:25 PM
Apr 2016

I take it that means like in the NY primary I should have been registered here 6 months ago for my opinion to count?

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
27. Welcome to DU. Apologies for the Clinton supporters that are unwelcoming to new Democrats, here. nt
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:36 AM
Apr 2016

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
13. Washington is a caucus state that had 5% of the electorate voting.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:29 PM
Apr 2016

A total of 230,000 participants. I don't see the comparison.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
14. Yeah, we have a double system.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:40 PM
Apr 2016

Many people are lazy and they just vote in the primary coming up because they mail out the ballots for those. He had a turn out close to when we supported Obama last election, it was 93.8%. That is a whole nother thing. No clue why the hell many more do not show up or mail in in one of the easiest places to vote. The caucus can be way more fun, but they are also more cheap from the sounds of it. I have voted in Arizona and in Arkansas and this one is the easiest for me. If they did not have the mail in, then I would be less of a fan.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
25. Caucuses inherently limit turnout as compared to a primary
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:33 AM
Apr 2016

It's hard to claim that you're for more people voting if you aren't adamantly against caucuses.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
32. please read my posts, WA does not limit.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:45 AM
Apr 2016

But open mail in primaries are the best, postage paid would be ultimate, that is WA in generals, just not paid.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
51. WA has surrogate ballots for those who have to work,
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 04:39 AM
Apr 2016

have military service, religious observances, are sick or are disabled on Caucus day. In fact, Clinton's campaign mailed an immense number of surrogate ballots to elderly voters all over the state.

The WA Dem Party received 30,000 surrogate ballots in all...and still Clinton lost in a huge Bernie landslide.

It turns out that it's the people who make the rules that actually limit turnout in both primaries and caucuses. And I am adamantly against caucuses...and closed primaries. At least caucuses do not use taxpayer money to run them. Closed primaries like the one in NY do, while disenfranchising a majority of the very taxpayers who pay for them.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
5. They mention the Vatican trip as a distraction (above) and in the article --
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:20 PM
Apr 2016

symptomatic of the "scattershot" approach to the NY campaign; also, the decision to go was Sanders's alone.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
15. Yes, the top 1% funded corporate media noise machine turned up the noise full blast.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:05 AM
Apr 2016

And Sanders still won the state outside of NYC.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
17. Strange how Paul Song profusely praised Clinton right before that comment and that all of his family
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:09 AM
Apr 2016

supports Clinton. As one young voter told me the other day, "I really wondered about that. It didn't seem right."

And the oh so quick response. Hmmm...more like it was ready and waiting...
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
20. He lost because he promoted anti-capitalism and anti-Zionism,
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:10 AM
Apr 2016

two things which really have not only no place in New York Dem politics, but no place in Democratic politics or American politics anywhere. Capitalism isn't perfect, and needs reform, but owns socialism anyday. Zionism will continue for ever, and may it do so. Hillary is on the correct side, Bernie is not.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
24. NOT anti-capitalism
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:30 AM
Apr 2016

Opposed to Profits Ubher Alles pirate Monopoly Capitalism and Wall St. Piggishness that fucks workers and consumers so they can add a few percentage points, conquer all markets, kill all competition....and so the Biggest Swine at the top can buy their 5th million dollar home.

Healthy, ethical and competitive capitalism with social responsibility is not the same as the new Gilded Age that the Clintions and their cronies espouse and practice.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
21. The lies and distortion by Clintons buddy who owns the daily news and was continuously repeated by
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:12 AM
Apr 2016

the corporate whores.
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
29. he lost because new yorkers like HRC more. winning NY was always a pipe dream
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:40 AM
Apr 2016

he never polled ahead of her here. he didn't lose because of one remark, he lost because people like and trust her more in NY

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
42. Yes. The same way Wall Street likes to hear Hillary speak more than Bernie.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:31 AM
Apr 2016

Not Hillary's fault she is more in demand.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
43. yes, not her fault. she is the senator from NY, of course she has ties
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:32 AM
Apr 2016

to actual employers/industries in ny.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
33. Or more to the point, blacks and latinos voted for Clinton...as they planned to all along...
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:51 AM
Apr 2016

It's not rocket science. Oh and a Closed Primary didn't hurt.

And for the record, It's cool that Clinton has the Black and Latino vote, nothing wrong with it. She's a known commodity among those folks and for whatever reason, they seem to support her.

But let's not pretend all this parsing and gnashing of teeth is going to divine some higher truth in this. Simply stated, Demographics and a Closed Primary Matter.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
35. didn't see you guys have meltdowns over closed caucuses though.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

and yeah demographics matter. Clinton win states that look like the democratic party.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
37. Frankly caucuses are stupid. But the whole system is stupid.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:10 AM
Apr 2016

How in the fuck can you call yourself the Democratic Party with the superdelegate thing being such a huge factor?? That's not democratic, that is the definition of anti-democratic. Then there's Iowa and New Hampshire always going first...idiocy. Then there's all the Southern Conservative Bible Thumpin' states going next... usually after that it's considered the "people have spoken"and it's a done deal by then.

So the stupid ass caucus system is just the tip of the stupid fucking iceberg.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
38. i actually think the superdelegates are fine, in case of a trump like scenario
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:13 AM
Apr 2016

but i think it should all be closed primaries (with registration deadlines within a month of the primary, not this October shit with NY), and states that look like the democratic party.

I could be argued out of the super delegates thing, but the caucuses are dumb and no one has that kind of free time. Plus asking people to register months ahead is dumb. Choice of states are dumb.

so we agree on more things than we disagree on

i would also like this to be a faster process. months of a primary create unnecessary hostility among people who agree on most issues.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
40. i think NY state will take a second look about it's voting issues
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:18 AM
Apr 2016

it has been shamed more than in previous years.

the money thing will require a lot of movement in the courts and with congress.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
34. Sanders was never going to win NY, just like Hillary was not going to win VT.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:51 AM
Apr 2016

Sanders left NY in 1968. In 2000 New Yorkers sent Hillary to the Senate, the first woman they voted to that post. She won her reelection in 2006 by an even wider margin. She was a popular senator and SOS. She and Bill are local fixtures and are seen going out to eat, the theater, walking around the city, visiting Chelsea and Charlotte, etc. Why would they abandon her now?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
41. Dr. Paul Song...“corporate Democratic whores.”
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:23 AM
Apr 2016

The "gift" that keeps on giving.

Bernie's surrogates really killed him, they could not hide their contempt and hate for the party and its members.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
44. And they keep on killing him day by day. Changed many voters minds about Bernie.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:33 AM
Apr 2016

He refused to call his nasty supporters out.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
45. He barely had a chance to start with, and that AWFUL editorial interview
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:34 AM
Apr 2016

was the beginning of the NY end. Dr Song, The Vatican nonsense, lying, etc, just all piled on top of a very, very telling interview.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
46. Sanders flamed out in NY bigtime!
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:37 AM
Apr 2016

The whole edifice came crashing down and great was the wreckage of it!

JI7

(89,252 posts)
49. he was never going to win New York, the best would have been to try to make it as close as possible
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:48 AM
Apr 2016

and win as many delegates as he could .

even without this thing in the OP there would not have been much difference in the outcome.

Gothmog

(145,321 posts)
52. Sanders negative attacks on Clinton backfired
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:26 AM
Apr 2016

The combination of the NYDN interview and the negative attacks on Clinton really killed Sanders

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politico: How Bernie lost...