2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolitico: How Bernie lost New York
NEW YORK Bernie Sanders had just arrived at the rally, and missed the incendiary remark entirely. Many on the senators campaign had never even heard of Dr. Paul Song, the speaker who had just commandeered news coverage of a massive Washington Square rally in New York by referring to corporate Democratic whores.
Nevertheless, by the next morning, the campaign was forced into full scramble mode. Cable coverage of the 27,000-person rally was eclipsed by reporting on the furor surrounding the comment, requiring a Sanders response. After first resisting an apology, the campaign settled on disavowing the remark with a tweet.
Another day, another lost news cycle.
In New York, Sanders finally hit the wall, his winning streak ended by a daily pummeling that forced him on the defensive and erased the developing Comeback Kid narrative. The tabloids dealt him punishing hit after punishing hit. The Democratic establishment, most of it in Clintons camp, piled on harder than the Sanders campaign expected. Caught up in one distraction after another the quarrel over debate details, the back and forth with Clinton over her qualifications, a trip to the Vatican in the run-up to the election Sanders never gained his footing, or even came close to pulling off the upset victory he once predicted with frequency.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/how-bernie-lost-new-york-222173
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Closed primary, no one could switch since last year. But hey great victory in the boy's club you got there.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)...but if you want me to go over it again Washington is not closed, we are the most open and possibly one of the easiest to vote on, he won big here, way more than she won in NY. People can vote here on election day, does not matter what party you are in. We can vote by mail in. She lost here because we are open. I HATE all closed versions, I have complained about them all! How are you not able to grasp that in a proportional election with a candidate that crushes her in the independent votes I would not want every election open? Think about it! He wins in high turn out and open...she wins in closed and lower. When they said turn out was not up to par on 2008 and that this was closed I knew he lost.
George II
(67,782 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)I take it that means like in the NY primary I should have been registered here 6 months ago for my opinion to count?
GoldenThunder
(300 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)To both of you, nice to open replies no kindness!
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)A total of 230,000 participants. I don't see the comparison.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Many people are lazy and they just vote in the primary coming up because they mail out the ballots for those. He had a turn out close to when we supported Obama last election, it was 93.8%. That is a whole nother thing. No clue why the hell many more do not show up or mail in in one of the easiest places to vote. The caucus can be way more fun, but they are also more cheap from the sounds of it. I have voted in Arizona and in Arkansas and this one is the easiest for me. If they did not have the mail in, then I would be less of a fan.
mythology
(9,527 posts)It's hard to claim that you're for more people voting if you aren't adamantly against caucuses.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)But open mail in primaries are the best, postage paid would be ultimate, that is WA in generals, just not paid.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)have military service, religious observances, are sick or are disabled on Caucus day. In fact, Clinton's campaign mailed an immense number of surrogate ballots to elderly voters all over the state.
The WA Dem Party received 30,000 surrogate ballots in all...and still Clinton lost in a huge Bernie landslide.
It turns out that it's the people who make the rules that actually limit turnout in both primaries and caucuses. And I am adamantly against caucuses...and closed primaries. At least caucuses do not use taxpayer money to run them. Closed primaries like the one in NY do, while disenfranchising a majority of the very taxpayers who pay for them.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)blue neen
(12,322 posts)and this vetting was nothing compared to what would have happened in the General election.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)symptomatic of the "scattershot" approach to the NY campaign; also, the decision to go was Sanders's alone.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)And Sanders still won the state outside of NYC.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's what right wingers do
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Proof please.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)supports Clinton. As one young voter told me the other day, "I really wondered about that. It didn't seem right."
And the oh so quick response. Hmmm...more like it was ready and waiting...
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)two things which really have not only no place in New York Dem politics, but no place in Democratic politics or American politics anywhere. Capitalism isn't perfect, and needs reform, but owns socialism anyday. Zionism will continue for ever, and may it do so. Hillary is on the correct side, Bernie is not.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Opposed to Profits Ubher Alles pirate Monopoly Capitalism and Wall St. Piggishness that fucks workers and consumers so they can add a few percentage points, conquer all markets, kill all competition....and so the Biggest Swine at the top can buy their 5th million dollar home.
Healthy, ethical and competitive capitalism with social responsibility is not the same as the new Gilded Age that the Clintions and their cronies espouse and practice.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)the corporate whores.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)he never polled ahead of her here. he didn't lose because of one remark, he lost because people like and trust her more in NY
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Not Hillary's fault she is more in demand.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)to actual employers/industries in ny.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)It's not rocket science. Oh and a Closed Primary didn't hurt.
And for the record, It's cool that Clinton has the Black and Latino vote, nothing wrong with it. She's a known commodity among those folks and for whatever reason, they seem to support her.
But let's not pretend all this parsing and gnashing of teeth is going to divine some higher truth in this. Simply stated, Demographics and a Closed Primary Matter.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)and yeah demographics matter. Clinton win states that look like the democratic party.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)How in the fuck can you call yourself the Democratic Party with the superdelegate thing being such a huge factor?? That's not democratic, that is the definition of anti-democratic. Then there's Iowa and New Hampshire always going first...idiocy. Then there's all the Southern Conservative Bible Thumpin' states going next... usually after that it's considered the "people have spoken"and it's a done deal by then.
So the stupid ass caucus system is just the tip of the stupid fucking iceberg.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)but i think it should all be closed primaries (with registration deadlines within a month of the primary, not this October shit with NY), and states that look like the democratic party.
I could be argued out of the super delegates thing, but the caucuses are dumb and no one has that kind of free time. Plus asking people to register months ahead is dumb. Choice of states are dumb.
so we agree on more things than we disagree on
i would also like this to be a faster process. months of a primary create unnecessary hostility among people who agree on most issues.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)That would be a good step.
Chances of that happening: 0
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)it has been shamed more than in previous years.
the money thing will require a lot of movement in the courts and with congress.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Sanders left NY in 1968. In 2000 New Yorkers sent Hillary to the Senate, the first woman they voted to that post. She won her reelection in 2006 by an even wider margin. She was a popular senator and SOS. She and Bill are local fixtures and are seen going out to eat, the theater, walking around the city, visiting Chelsea and Charlotte, etc. Why would they abandon her now?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)The "gift" that keeps on giving.
Bernie's surrogates really killed him, they could not hide their contempt and hate for the party and its members.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)He refused to call his nasty supporters out.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)was the beginning of the NY end. Dr Song, The Vatican nonsense, lying, etc, just all piled on top of a very, very telling interview.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)The whole edifice came crashing down and great was the wreckage of it!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Almost everthing they did, was wrong.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)The Twilight of the Gods, Sanders fans.
JI7
(89,252 posts)and win as many delegates as he could .
even without this thing in the OP there would not have been much difference in the outcome.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)The combination of the NYDN interview and the negative attacks on Clinton really killed Sanders