2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI wish I could have some compassion for
Bernie supporters, but so many of them have said so many vile untrue things about democrats, that I just can't gather up an ounce of empathy or pity.
They have also treated Hillary supporters like Jim Clyburn, Jane Goodall, Delores Huerta, John Lewis, and so many more, with threatening and stalking behavior over social media. It makes me sick.
This has been one of the most disgusting, mean, rude campaigns ever run, imho.
I'm glad to see the end of it.
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but this kind of post makes me have zero compassion for you. Like I do not care about you.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)But you have to admit, he overall did way better than you thought he would when you jumped on board!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)do a bit of self-examination about the campaign and ask why, despite coming into this thing with a nearly cleared deck and every party-enabled advantage in the book, along with a heavy air of "inevitability", she still performed as poorly as she did.
The easy answers will be "misogyny", "they just don't like her/everyone is out to get her", that sort of thing. And yeah, it's there, and some people don't/are.
But the things she COULD have fixed, she clearly wasn't intending to, like coming into the campaign ready to run on empty gibberish like "the middle class needs a champion" (changed from "everyday Americans" which was a little too close to "everyday low prices"
and who can forget such gems like the "planned spontaneity" and "improved authenticity rollout"?
Does anyone honestly believe that, without Sanders in the race (forcing her to be a better candidate, I truly believe) the past 6 months wouldn't have been a steady stream of painfully poll-tested pablum sprinkled with (god, no) the occasional country music video?
Looking forward.. CAN she do better? Is she capable of it? I hope so.
(And of course, the nature of modern politics begs the question as to whether or not competent governance really even has a whole lot to do with being able to run a competent or inspiring campaign, but that's a question for another day. In the meantime, we still want and need to win.)
as we transition- and I suspect we are likely to- towards a GE footing, it would be nice if Hillary's campaign and supporters did some real self-examination about how to appeal to and inspire the folks who have felt less than inspired, by her campaign, particularly younger voters. And it would be great it we all could find other ways to handle it besides "screw those people, they're all a bunch of %))%s because they did this and said that and blah, blah, blah NEVER FORGIVE NEVER FORGET"
And I would apply that to BOTH sides.
But, I know better than to hold my breath on that.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)My hope is that he has inspired many to take this further.
We laugh at the Teabaggers but they were smart enough to win seats locally for years, which led to Teabagger/creepy asshole Cruz actually having a chance to be POTUS!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Too many beltway types have been listening to the sound of their own wheels spinning for too long, while imagining it is the divinely ordained music of the spheres.
Or somethin'.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I think Bernie knows that he owns the West, and that is why he is staying in the campaign until the very end.
littlebit
(1,728 posts)that TX, AZ, NM, LA, MO, AR, and OH are all west of the Mississippi right?
Number23
(24,544 posts)Thanks so much for that.
littlebit
(1,728 posts)GoldenThunder
(300 posts)???
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)We'll chalk it up to being very late at night and you being obviously disappointed.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)+ a few more.
GoldenThunder
(300 posts)...and I'm still never voting for her.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And it's fine, it's your vote.
littlebit
(1,728 posts)Think I celebrated my bday a little to much. I meant Iowa.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,636 posts)Not one.
We all know what a disaster that would be.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I take it to mean they are willing to bust the nation to teach everyone a lesson for not voting for Bernie. It means, letting a Republican win the GE will be a "serves you right" lesson and therefore a preferred President to a Democrat
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,636 posts)I've always understood "or Bust" means we'll do anything to get where we want to be.
Didn't the pioneers say "California or Bust"? Something like that.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)It means you've failed, you're broken (physically, financially, emotionally), you're unable to move any further, you're finished, done, wasted, kaput.
It does ***NOT*** mean that you've seen a little difficulty, and will have a better chance to succeed next time around. With "or bust", there is no next time!
So in this context, "Bernie or bust" is blackmail meaning either we nominate Bernie, or we see the utter destruction of the progressive movement and the Democratic Party.
Sorry, but I *like* the Democratic Party and the progressive movement too much to see it high-jacked by people who relish in attacking them and wish to see them fail.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:25 AM - Edit history (1)
Hillary has to earn our vote. I am not voting for a Hawk who considers Kissinger a wonderful advisor...sorry.
If the Democratic Party would like us to vote for the candidate they need to run one we can stomach without having to vote for the lessor of two evils.
So for me, and I only speak for me, I will not vote for "the lessor of two evils". My vote is earned NOT given.
Been a Dem for 40 years and have voted for the lessor for too long now. NO MORE.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)If a republican wins that is the DNC's fault - not mine. If Hillary can not earn the voters that is her fault.
Simply because you blame me does not make it truel
JCanete
(5,272 posts)Plenty of posters have tried in vein to explain this. It doesn't mean our rationale is right, but it must be willful ignorance on your part if you don't at least address the reasons we put forward, and instead go with this bullshit straw-man.
Here's a very simplistic version for you. Bear in mind, this is based on my version of the state of things, not necessarily the state of things.
I want what's best for this nation. Damn straight that's not Trump. He's a fucking embarrassment. But I am tired of being tacked over to the slow lane and lulled to sleep by democrats, who from my perspective, are working for the same interests the republicans are working for, and driving us down the same road. Its just a lot more elegant when they do it. They're taking money from the same people the Republicans do, so that they can be viable candidates in our ridiculously expensive election process. By necessity, their interests are the interests of the corporate elite, or else they wouldn't have gotten so far(unless they are off in some corner like Vermont) and even if they would like to do some good, the price for it is always too damn high.
This election cycle in particular, has been very enlightening to me as to what "insider" really means. It means to me, good intentions or not, that no good will ever be done under these conditions. What will be done is we will continue to fight over solutions for the symptoms while the real illnesses go unchecked, and sadly, I've come to the conclusion that that's the way both parties like it.
I think a Trump presidency would be humiliating, and his candidacy alone is making the looneys come out of the woodwork. But in my opinoion, he's only in a position to become president because Republican's and Democrats alike have continued to foster a war around wedge issues and not the bigger picture items that make people more susceptible to fear and tribalism. That means he's not going to be the last.
I don't want to "serve anybody right" by not voting for his opponent. The funny thing is though, I'd be more likely to vote for Hillary over Ted Cruz or Kasitch, because in the case of insider vs insider, I'll go with the lesser of two evils, even if it continues to validate the DNC system of disenfranchising liberal voters. Trump though, is such a bumbling fool, with likeables in the toilet. He's no Hitler or Stalin. He's a lightening rod for righteous fury and action because he isn't tactful, and he isn't smart. The backlash to a Trump Presidency is likely to be monumental, and nobody, republican and democrat alike are going to work with him. Am I willing to bet the next 4 years on that(assuming he wouldn't get impeached first), I ... doubt it. It scares the hell out of me. But so does our current and continued trajectory as a nation, irrespective of the party at the wheel.
So please, by all means, talk about how we're conspiracy theorists, or naive to the complicated issues that make tweaks to the status quo the far better option to political revolution, but the next time you characterize our reasons for considering passing on the GE Presidential ticket as vindictiveness and nothing more, well know that you would be lying.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)You are the one who lacks the historical knowledge of statements made here.
Your noble cause and verbose writings mean little when compared to the reality of statements made here for all to read.
Fwiw at DU we attempt to stick with the terms of service and avoid personal attacks, like calling a fellow board member a liar.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)I didn't call you a liar. I said under certain hypothetical future circumstances you would be lying, but I could have made my point entirely differently, so apologies. As to statements made on DU, I've seen plenty of thoughtful posts on the subject, and apparently you've read far more posts than I have, so I'll just assume you've had the fortune of not seeing any of those.
angrychair
(8,700 posts)Before you engage in more conversations with this person, please read his transparency tab first. in my opinion, as someone that has been here 10 years, I would not waste my time.
GoldenThunder
(300 posts)That's one sick puppy.
renate
(13,776 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)1. He's not that into foreign military involvement
2. He doesn't take corporate cash
3. He's been consistent on his issues for years
These three things are the exact opposite of what I see in Hillary Clinton. In order for me to vote for her, I need to set aside three things that are very important to me. That's what the Bernie or Bust struggle is to me.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)seaglass
(8,173 posts)anyone else if Trump did win. It's grotesque.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)I thought Hillary's peeps said politics is a contact sport?
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Hillary buried him.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)have been a liitle bit unruly the last week.
Since the debate when she really put it away.
You have to expect a little bit of push back now that he's done.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Have fun in the GE.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)The un-Democratic lot of them are going to continue their insulting and bellyaching for the foreseeable future. Every single thing from here on out will be "rigged," "stolen," or some other complaint.
They were never Democrats to start with, and they are intent on taking the party down with their golden boy.
artislife
(9,497 posts)I am kind of curious to see Jill Stein's numbers in November. She will probably get some good money from the Feds to the Greens...
Interesting times, interesting times.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)...what the Hillary OP above says we do and yet YOU are doing just that. Saying we are not dems...what an Ass.
I have been a Dem voter for 40 years...never once deviating...never once. And often sending money to those I support - like Franken, Warren and others.
Bernie was close and will get a good number of delegates - a very good number....so he is still in the game and that is chapping your rump because you all want him out...well we are not getting out!
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)Bernie and his supporters are running a good campaign that are exposing aspects of our candidate we would rather not have exposed
morningfog
(18,115 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)It's over and believe me the treatment many received from BSers wasn't nice.
This was a nastily run campaign, with untrue innuendo of corruption.
I'm glad it's over, FINALLY. Everyone should be.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Hillary's campaign manager John Podesta (Group) handles PR (public relations) for billions of dollars in arms sales to the Saudis from such big players like Lockheed Martin.
You know Saudi Arabia?... the country responsible for 9/11?
Well the John Podesta Group is essentially a go-between that helps Saudi Arabia with their image to further sales growth in weaponry, etc.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/01/07/washingtons-multi-million-dollar-saudi-pr-machine
In Latin America her support for coup regimes, militarization, and privatization; trade deals that wreak economic havoc, all of which have resulted in death.
http://www.thenation.com/article/a-voters-guide-to-hillary-clintons-policies-in-latin-america/
"Hillary has nothing to brag about: Her foreign policy record is a disaster"
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/23/there_is_no_foreign_policy_d_league_hillarys_foreign_policy_disastrous_experience_partner/
She has waffled mightily regarding the potentially disastrous Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal (TPP).
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/08/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-now-opposes-trans-pacific-partners/
She was for fracking and the Keystone XL pipeline before she told us she isn't.
"Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World"
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
She is a recent convert to supporting same sex marriage after a decade of opposing it.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jun/17/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-change-position-same-sex-marriage/
boston bean
(36,221 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)...supporter to supporter from both sides.
I'm more issue oriented although I'm not squeaky clean I'll admit.
But going after each other I find pointless.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I just don't get the visceral hatred towards a man who has lived his entire life according to the principles of civil rights and economic and social justice. I'm just so heartbroken about the way our party has been divided because I thought we were better than that... but I also hope that the party as a whole isn't represented by what I see on DU, so maybe in real life it's not so bad. Gosh, I hope not.
Broward
(1,976 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)and the bern baggers are upset that all those stupid Democratic voters made their preference known.
Well, there's always a home for them over at Jackassradicals.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)They're back in they're "You have to be nice to us if you want our vote" bullshit.
Maybe later. For now, you reap what you sowed for the past month.
artislife
(9,497 posts)They will just take their game to another party, a progressive one.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)but the missing Bernie supporters will be replaced by 2 kitchen table issue Democrats.
The ones who don't think Pragmatism and compromise are dirty words.
Who understand that steady progress will always get you there faster in the long run.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)You've got nowhere to pull any 2 for 1 voters out of anywhere. There is but one untapped source of voters and that is the folks on the couch and the folks running the Turd Way show are all about doing nothing to mobilize and invigorate those people, might as well work with the stinking leftist if that was the direction they were willing to go that would be easier.
So, that leaves the move right to fail to pick up Independents hokey pokey or the unicorn crapping 4 leaf clover rare "moderate" Republicans shuffle both of which are not only nonsense but actually preposterous.
There is nothing particularly left to hook and reel in conservatives and be able to hold what is the firewall of votes. Gonna give them a half loaf on abortion? Gonna build "The Wall"? Gonna let cops murder more black kids or deny the vote to them? Gonna roll back gay rights? Gonna repeal Obamacare? Gonna get those deportations up? Gonna finish off the unions?
Nutty as the clowns have been, I don't think you have enough cover to give right about anything else. I honestly do not believe you have enough chips to cover that bet.
You can't replace much beyond typical bleed rates and even that is only because of truly ridiculous options from the opposition, I say.
There are no 2 for 1 votes hiding in the bushes over yonder. That is bluster. Whistling past the graveyard.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)The already red states will stay red. The already blue states will stay blue.
It will come down to swing states just like it always does.
OH FL and this year VA and probly NC will be in play.
Bernie wouldn't have come anywhere close to winning those states.
Those are kitchen table working family states with large diverse populations.
When Bernie started talking about Democratic Socialism and free college the voters in those states
saw it as naive idealism. President Obama couldn't get a public option on the ACA because the congressional
support wasnt there but somehow Bernie will deliver universal healthcare for all. And when ask how he'd do it
he deflects with talk about a revolution and marching on Washington.
That's a naive pipe dream.
Kitchen table issue voters don't have time for Bernies we want it all right now, no compromise revolution.
They see that as unrealistic.
Their importanat right now issues are the same as they've always been.
Working their jobs, raising their families, getting their kids to school and soccer practice and
making their payments and stretching their money.
The vast majority of those voters are ok with incrementalism. Things have gotten steadily if slowly better since 2008.
They're not going to put that progress at risk for Bernies ideas when he can't even explain how he intends to get them passed or pay for them.
All or nothing doesn't appeal to most families who tend to be more than 1 issue voters.
They're sure as hell not going to trust anybody the Republicans are offering.
I understand that Bernies supporters are very disappointed but saying over and over only Bernie can win
isn't supported by the facts.
He couldn't even get Democrats who describe themselves as very liberal to vote for him.
Except for MI Bernies successes came in small not very diverse states. I don't mean racially diverse altho that too.
I liked a lot of Bernies ideas and in 20 more years we may be ready as a country to give those ideas a try but right now we're not.
We 're not going to get there with some over night revolution.
Sorry that your candidate lost.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Sounds like shrinking the political map back to the Kerry math and trying to eek out a narrow win against a ridiculous opponent.
Fucking brilliant!
griffi94
(3,733 posts)He wasn't ever going to win those states
keep on letting your anger drive you if that's what it takes.
She will be president Bernie supporters can't wish that away anymore than they could wish Bernie
to the nominatation.
Hillary will take all of those swing states and that will easily offset the Bernie supporters in the already rock solid blue states who won't vote for her.
How is putting states like NC in play shrinking the map.
You seem to suffer from tunnel vision.
You don't like her so nobody will vote for her.
If that were true then Bernie would be our nominee.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)just as we would be though we at least could make a play for the couches, you will not because you are unwilling to attract them because they doesn't work for the real people you serve.
You claimed the magical 2 for 1 but it is a crock, if you could have got those 2 for 1 votes you would have already and had 3 losing none.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)I never said anything about a secret cache of voters.
Hillary will carry Democrats and liberals and moderates. She'll even carry right of center
Indies and Republicans.
Those voters aren't secret. The tent will get bigger.
Most of Bernie supporters will vote for her. Exit polls yesterday showed only 13%
of Bernie voters wouldn't support Hillary.
Not 13% of all voters. 13% of the small minority that voted for Bernie.
Hillary got more total votes yesterday than all the Republican combined.
Of course there will be some perpetually disgruntled Bernie or Bust people.
They won't be missed.
Average Americans rejected Bernie decisively.
Bernie lost.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)The Bernie or bust bravado is annoying as hell and it will be great day when that level of mentality is gone from DU
Response to Sheepshank (Reply #16)
Post removed
frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)but I cannot understand supposed democrats voting for a neocon in sheep's clothing.
Actually, I don't wish I had more tolerance. You guys are screwing the world.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)No one ever made the mistake of thinking you were that type.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)He worries me.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Desperate and unwilling to understand how odds work as the remaining delegates become unavailable.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Rachel and Brian were so stunned when he finished talking that they were verklempt and had to go to commercial so they could get him out of the studio before they could respond to what he had said.
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)Bernie will not concede. I'd say there is an 80% chance he will not stay a Democrat, and he will not campaign for Hillary.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Sanders has spent twice as much as Hillary for around half the votes. Those who are funding him as an investment--Rove, for example--are going to cut off the funding stream as it becomes clear he can't produce.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Hillary spent comfortably more this campaign than Bernie, I posted a link proving it just a day or two ago.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Where Bernie spend 5.4 million and Hillary 2.8 million, partially just because she had so much infrastructure there already.
okasha
(11,573 posts)and other states. It keeps cropping up precisely because it's true.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)TSIAS
(14,689 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)FourScore
(9,704 posts)You're right. You have no compassion.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)FourScore
(9,704 posts)Just because of a few unpleasant people (which you have on your side too - trust me on that), you have lost your compassion? Really?
Have you contemplated what it would feel like to read an OP like yours after such a bitter loss if the tables were turned? Especially if so many people who wanted to vote for Hillary were purged and switched, and exit polls, once again, were waaay off, the discrepancy, once again, in Bernie's favor? How would you feel?
Just read your OP and imagine it the other way around.
And no, I'm not saying "Hillary" stole the election, but somebody is doing a masterful job of disenfranchising Bernie voters.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)or vote for Trump or someone else, that is their issue, NOT mine.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)turn around and say, you should really treat us nice for our votes and bring us back into the fold. After treating others like pieces of crap?
Sorry, doesn't work that way, at this very minute anyways.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)At a Democratic forum. Think about that really hard.
Response to Kentonio (Reply #110)
Amimnoch This message was self-deleted by its author.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)than actually having more votes in an election.
Or something.
Think about that really hard.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)People here (mostly) have no political capital at risk by their support, so its a good way of seeing who genuinely liberal and progressive people gravitate towards.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)etc., pretending to be liberals and progressives. Judging by the sheer volume of right wing propaganda papering the walls of this particular forum, they have been very successful in using DU to spread their special brand of criticism.
Pretty sure the admins are changing the way things work around here for a reason.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Some trolls on the Bernie side definitely got away with murder because of over-weighed juries, but after the rules were changed a lot of Hillary trolls were allowed back to continue trolling. The system was broken on both sides.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Makes a note: 'BB doesn't give a crap if someone doesn't vote for Hillary in the GE' if she makes it.
William769
(55,147 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)this nonsense up to the bitter end.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)...because you think it's about Bernie and that's it.
oasis
(49,389 posts)for weakness. Even Bernie got as nasty as Weaver and Devine. I'm not cutting any more slack.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)It's over, he can't win. They need to face reality, no matter how strongly we have to keep saying it.
Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)And there's a place where the sun doesn't shine. Put your compassion there.
Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)That's DESPICABLE.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)OP is misleading.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)That was enough to rile up the mob.
betsuni
(25,537 posts)such as being photographed speaking to her as Goodall was, makes them a target of the small but extremely obnoxious minority of Bernie supporters.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Vicious, vicious, vicious...
Nothing more to add beyond what you've already said here, just AMEN.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)You don't wish that at all. Who do you think you are fooling?
ladyfinger
(8 posts)The Bernstorm will win all 5 states next week with conviction that NY election results has to be completely considered fraud.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)The superiority complexes, the name calling. The character attacks from Bernie and his followers. Sickening
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)And I won't shed a tear for you.
.99center
(1,237 posts)Trump Supporters, un-Democratic , golden boy, bern baggers.
"This has been one of the most disgusting, mean, rude campaigns ever run, imho.
I agree with ya there
PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)If we followed up investing in our young people instead of putting them into wage slavery, curing people instead of forcing them to pay for profit Healthcare for the rest of their life taking meds. Getting off the Fossil Fuel addiction, having a choice where we can be self-sustainable and not a slave to Big Energy. Making sure everyone can afford and eat Organic food, including the homeless and incarcerated.
Breaking up the Big Banks so we don't have to worry about a crash that makes us all look like Detroit or seeing a trade bill passed that will essentially dissolve everything the labor movement worked for over 100 years, see: TPP. Lets not forget all the people that will die because their medical treatments will become too expensive. It will firmly establish a "Digital Feudalism" Max Keiser) in many areas of the arts(Max Keiser). What will it take for us to grow up?! When they print a barcode around our necks?!
I say, Viva Meshnet!!!!!!
Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)how that sounds. You cannot blame a whole category of people for what a few of them do. Believe me, there are plenty of Hillary supporters who do the same things. In fact, Hillary has a large team of paid "digital responders" working for David Brock, the guy who ginned up the stories about Anita Hill, who churn up and throw dirt at all of her opponents 24/7. But I don't blame all Hillary supporters for this, just the one's doing it.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)We've ripped up a bunch of sexism and anti-Semitism in our party, not to mention just a bunch of people on both sides who have no idea how to talk to or about black people, LGBTQ people, or poor people.
I hope Hillary supporters accept they embarrassed themselves too. I'm ashamed of my side enough, but you guys need to own it.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)I suppose you're just blind to it coming from your own camp, which is human. From this side of things, it looks very different, and there's no point in anybody going back and forth about who's the worst, or joining in a circle jerk about it. For my part, I can acknowledge that some posts from Bernie supporters are inflammatory, and not at all sensitive to Hillary supporters or their candidate.
As to Delores Huerta and John Lewis in particular, I must have missed the really fucked up shit that you saw, but taking them to task for untrue things they said or strongly implied, was not throwing them under the bus. I saw plenty of posts baffled by their decisions to say what they said, but still respecting their long and storied contribution to a better world.
As to those isolated incidents of online thuggery or bullying, well you're welcome to paint us all with that brush. It has nothing to do with Bernie's national campaign that you just maligned, or the man himself, who has a really good track record being on the right side of history, and has been one of the only voices in congress even to verbally acknowledge many of these urgent issues that we face. I would hope that you wouldn't throw a voice like that under the bus.
Good luck to your candidate. I promise you that if I choose not to vote the top of the ticket come November, it will have nothing to do with the nasty posts I've seen by Hillary supporters, nor the loyalty tests, nor the posts about how fracking and money in politics and free trade agreements are either not really that bad, or are actually pretty good for us. It will be either because those are the things Hillary herself actually believes or is willing to say to keep the money flowing, and which of those two is true doesn't make that much difference to me at the end of the day.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)On Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:36 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
I wish I could have some compassion for
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511785471
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Hateful and divisive, exactly the kind of thing that will make unity for the fall impossible. This is purely disruptive metadiscussion.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:48 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing hideable about this post.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Pretty much true, unfortunately.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Despicable, but have to leave the whole thread alone. Down thread calling psycho is OTT.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Someone else's opinion about an unacceptable condition is not worthy of a hide because your candidate wasn't the victor in this election. Take a deep breath. I have seen far more objectionable comments made about tonight's victor and supporters for some time, this is nothing like that.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)And the vindictivness towars Bernie, the cleanest candidate is clearly shown in the Hillary group.
They want to marginalize him and totally disenfranchise him for the audacity of exposing the ugly side of Hillary.
In other words, they are not as forgiving as Obama who gave Hiullary the SoS post despite months of smear campaigns that gave GOP food for years to chew on.
None of those you have mentioned have been demonized by Bernie supporters.
They smeared Bernie and his supporters and claims victimhood when called out on it.
And now, with more people like you in the Hillary camp and DNC, your corporate hustler will never see then inside of the WH again as a tenant. Why?
Hillary and her campaign with David Brock and Henry Kissinger can thank themselves! None of these are remotely progressive.
While Bernie supporters have tried to debate issues with Hillary supporters, Hillary supporters reply with smear tactics and personal attacks on Bernie Sanders while trying to elevate Hillary to sainthood, making her the victim as if she as a woman is so frail that she can't take whatever she is throwing and must be treated like china. What amazes me, is that the same people who uses the sexist meme have the same contempt for Elisabeth Warren as they have for Bernie. In other words, their poutrage is as hollow as giant balloon.
If anything, it's the Hilary supporters, her surrogates and herself who needs to come crawling with the hat in the hand, begging for forgiveness, and hope that Bernie and his supprters are not as vindictive as Hillary is.
From the footage I have seen, Bernie supporters seem to be quite a liberqal bunch with plenty of love and forgiveness to go around. But voting for a candidate who seem to be hellbent on doing without them, and have minioins of loyal followers who blindly repeats the daile smear of Bernie in MSM and claims victimhood when called out on it.
Wonder what John Lewis' price was to sell out a fellow civil rights activist for a candidate who's intents have been crystal clear ever since the Super-predator remark where she looked to blame the AA kids for the drug war that Clinton continued rather than actually solving any problems.
Bernie didn't throw John Lewis under the bus. John Lewis threw Bernie under the bus. Someone whose parents survuved Holocaust during a time when Hillary's father was in the south, teaching his daughter some "southern values" like racial prejudice.
If you cannot convince Bernie supporters to forgive the sleaziest campaign I have ever witnessed on the democratic side, then don't expect to win in November either.
Karma has a bad tendency to come back and bite...
So good luck in getting back all the millions of voters yoiu have alienated. You will make it easier for so many to vote 3rd party. But don't worry. You might get some establihment repubicsns on your side. Just to consolidate the close ideologicl ties between corporate "democrats" and GOP...
Response to boston bean (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Your post seems familiar
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Response to rbrnmw (Reply #86)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Months of post after post using RW talking points and even links to RW media and sites. The derision for Hillary on DUP is frankly disturbing and depressing. Tonight, I've read several posts by people who claim that they refuse to vote for her in the GE. That's nothing to be proud of, quite the contrary. Hillary is not Trump, no matter how many here try to portray her that way.
I can understand the disappointment of his supporters, I was heartbroken in 2008 when Obama won the nomination. But, I think most of us realized that Obama would be a far better choice than McCain. Elections do matter and pulling a Nader is disgusting, selfish and shortsighted. Trump or Cruz would be an absolute disaster. I cringe to think what either of them would do to the country if they were in charge.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)betsuni
(25,537 posts)So much hate, and for what.
Response to boston bean (Original post)
Post removed
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...schadenfreude tastes SO good. But be careful, sometimes you serve it, sometimes it's force fed. Congrats on the win! Hope these results can be repeated in November.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Believe me they are just as vile and mean. And say horrible things about us not being true Democrats or being traitors or being responsible for every bad thing in the country.
There are also lots of Hillary Supporters going around Alerting Bernie supporters as well.
Pot meet Kettle.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Just know, you're on your own now. Hopefully for your sake, you've got enough support to go the distance.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)What gets me so, is how some here pretend this is all one sided - as in their side is all morally superior. UM NO...we can read.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)I don't take to kindly to it.
It may not be all one sided, but there was a hell of a lot more ugliness emanating from one side. And that is the truth.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Agree 100% on that one bb. I don't mind healthy challenge, but this primary season is so vile and toxic. She has every right to run and win just like Bernie does...I am somewhat disappointed in a few friends here taking it to a level that it should never go to.
We're all progressives here, trying to get a progressive into office. In 2010 I agreed with a lot of people here about HRC...then I did my own research and stopped following the crowd. There is NOTHING there when it comes to the Clintons. They make their money off of public speeches...am I supposed to get mad at them for that? NEVER...that is success in my book.
Hang in there bb...after California, this will be over.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Is this your personal GOTV campaign for the general election?
villager
(26,001 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)it's over and probably beyond.
This is a movement, and we're fighting for things we think are important and fair and just.
I know, perhaps you think Hillary does too. I know that for myself, I just don't agree. I know she's willing to sell me out any other day of the week.
senz
(11,945 posts)I must have missed them. Hopefully, I'll see some later.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)this primary has been baby frolics.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)I have zero compassion. I was dreading an inevitable vote for Sanders in November if he was the candidate since we must stop Trump. Now, it doesn't sound so inevitable anymore. He doesn't have a chance. No chance. I've seen the abuse his so-called supporters have heaped on so many super delegates on Facebook. I wil be shocked if more than ten of them switch. No chance. None. The party's over.
Number23
(24,544 posts)sexism, or the patronizing, paternalistic garbage towards every single person or group that didn't support Sanders. These folks slimed Black Lives Matter, Dolores Huerta AND fucking Planned Parenthood and I'm sure are still absolutely MYSTIFIED why they lost the black, Hispanic and woman votes. I've never seen such full throated insanity and stupidity.
I'm not only glad that their candidate lost but can only hope that they have finally come to understand not only how politics works but how this country has changed. Screaming about "social justice warriors" and how "Southern" ((cough BLACK)) voters shouldn't count will definitely rile up certain folks but they are not nearly as powerful and definitely not as numerous as they used to be.
betsuni
(25,537 posts)and anyway Hillary supporters are much worse!"
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)I want to add it to the OP!
PBass
(1,537 posts)but I think the worst was posting the phone numbers and addresses of superdelegates online a few weeks ago, with the instructions to call them with threats that they not vote for Hillary Clinton. Not only are tactics like this utterly frightening, but they are also pretty stupid... the superdelegates don't matter until the convention, and the convention doesn't matter until the primaries are over. It would be extremely unusual for superdelegates not to nominate the candidate who had the most pledged delegates.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Response to boston bean (Original post)
My Good Babushka This message was self-deleted by its author.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)election, it would be nice if the Hillary supporters stopped being so nasty . . . hard as it is . . . so some of us might somehow convince ourselves the Supreme Court is worth voting for a candidate we can't stand.
brooklynite
(94,597 posts)Vinca
(50,278 posts)One thing I've noticed about Hillary people is how you hold grudges. And you keep bringing up old news over and over and over and over again. Kind of like your candidate, in a way. Old news.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)We have our nominee as of this date, way before it you ask me, but I feel like being generous.
Answer, please, who is it going to be?
Vinca
(50,278 posts)It doesn't mean I won't have to be dragged kicking and screaming to the voting booth to do it. For me, voting for Hillary would be like getting in the time machine and casting a vote for Richard Nixon or Ronald Reagan. She's so far from the Democrats I always admired it makes me rethink the whole party.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)She has won the nomination. Maybe just accept that fact.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)My beliefs mean more to me than that. I fully expect the time will come when Hillary will veer back right and I'll be writing the words "we told you so." Wait until that abortion compromise comes along and she signs it.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Them's the breaks.
AirmensMom
(14,643 posts)Save it for all those who will suffer under a Hillary presidency. BTW, I hope you don't have any military kids who will be sent to another war.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... she was so charming and appealing ... so ladylike and gracious ... so politically sophisticated and diplomatic ... so mature and warm with her defiant message of "fuck them!"
Remember that?
Good times, eh?
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I think we are seeing that right now, and not just on DU.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,181 posts)"Excellent. Soon each side will absolutely refuse to vote for the other side's candidate. Then, at the convention, we'll release our Supreme Delegates*, take the nomination, win the election, and everyone will have a free pony whether they want one or not!"
* Everyone thought it was "Super Delegates", but it was a misprint, and nobody noticed!
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)There was just a small screechy, fanatical faction in that crowd that poisoned the well for everybody else...
The good news is those clowns are defecting to Trump, so they were never real Dems in the first place...
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)But people like you are really testing my commitment to that.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)(Just sayin'.)
And even if they're not your literal "friends" ... I think you know who I'm talking about.
PS: You'll survive. The shit that the Bernie fans will have to endure will not last nearly as long as the shit and tormenting that Hillary fans have had to put up with. Keep in mind that the ratio at this particular web site has remained fairly constant at 6:1 in favor of Bernie ... and the jury results reflect that too. So, buck up. It will all be over soon and then we can all go back to being amicable friends again.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Keep up the good work!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Or else perhaps over-identifying personal, individual matters or unresolved issues with larger impersonal political events and forces.
I'd suggest taking a walk outside, enjoying some music, smoking a big fat joint if you're so inclined (it's the right day for it, after all) ... taking internet sturm und drang too seriously isn't good for your quality of life.
Just my humble opinion, of course.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Here is dr bostons DX for your condition:
Projection and presumption.
Rx is spend less time thinking about boston bean.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and I'm presumptuous?
Sure, okay. If you don't want people to talk about what you think, you shouldn't start OPs about what you think.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Despite the admittedly outsized ego. I'm an excellent judge of character.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Minus the ego.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm gonna be on the front lines trying to rally support for the ticket.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)I might not care, but I never accused you personally of any such thing.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)about it.
As witnessed by the OP, hence my initial response up there.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)thought to form it. It was blatant and overwhelming action that quickly solidified that opinion.