2016 Postmortem

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts) Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:13 AM Apr 2016

Sanders Outspends Clinton 2-to-1 in New York Ads

Bernie Sanders' campaign has outspent Hillary Clinton over New York's airwaves by a 2-to-1 margin, according to ad-spending data from SMG Delta.

The Sanders campaign has spent $5.6 million on ads in the Empire State, versus $2.8 million for the Clinton campaign.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/sanders-outspends-clinton-2-1-new-york-ads-n558361

Keep sending those $27 donations!

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders Outspends Clinton 2-to-1 in New York Ads (Original Post) Freddie Stubbs Apr 2016 OP

Campaigns cost money, national campaigns cost more, Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #1

The Force was with Hillary in the Hillary Blue Empire state... riversedge Apr 2016 #2

Probably should have used his Rome vacation money for more ads. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #3

Hillary's running out of money. Sanders was down 75% and got to 43%. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #4

were the costs for the charter to Rome to garner Pope support included in the above? DrDan Apr 2016 #5

Not that notable since Hillary had a huge advantage to start with and Bernie had to counter it... Human101948 Apr 2016 #6

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

1. Campaigns cost money, national campaigns cost more,

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:23 AM

Apr 2016

It isn't always the candidates being "influenced", not all candidates are, they know campaigns cost money, judgement.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)

2. The Force was with Hillary in the Hillary Blue Empire state...

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:24 AM

Apr 2016

The Empire Strikes back--and its all Hillary Blue....The Force is with HER>..

NBC News ?@NBCNews 7h7 hours ago

The Empire State strikes back, giving Clinton a crucial win http://nbcnews.to/23J8vCR #Decision2016 @aseitzwald

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

3. Probably should have used his Rome vacation money for more ads.

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:24 AM

Apr 2016

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)

4. Hillary's running out of money. Sanders was down 75% and got to 43%.

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:26 AM

Apr 2016

Hillary will lose a general election. There is finally, much more serious talk about that now......

so be it.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)

5. were the costs for the charter to Rome to garner Pope support included in the above?

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:29 AM

Apr 2016

Human101948

(3,457 posts)

6. Not that notable since Hillary had a huge advantage to start with and Bernie had to counter it...

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:31 AM

Apr 2016

She was up by 50 points when the campaign started and it was cut to 15 points.

As the New York Times notes, Bernie has proven that you do not have to be a corporate whore to fund a campaign--

What’s more, Mr. Sanders’s commitment to small individual contributions has put the lie to Democrats’ excuses that they, too, must play the big money game to win. This is a message too seldom heard in the party
that first championed campaign finance reform. That it’s back is long overdue, good for Democrats and good for campaigning.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/20/opinion/sanders-and-kasich-should-ignore-any-pressure-to-quit.html?emc=edit_th_20160420&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=70251688

Reply to this discussion