They are actually doing more harm to her overall than they can possibly imagine...We have the means to verify or debunk every single claim they throw out there. The gain for them is the actual low information voter who will not take time to verify stuff...the loss for them is that they will never again have a unified base for any candidate the PTB choose to attempt to pawn off on us..The chances for hill to win the GE are almost non existent, they seem to believe that the R's are really going to allow any of the active candidates really be the nominee, you can bet that there are already several viable candidates waiting in the wings to ride in and "save" their sorry asses...Even if they did actually allow one of those asinine idiots to run the odds are still against hill, she has alienated the indies by way too much to have any hope that they may vote for her, they are essential really to any candidate winning so she will lose a large percentage there, next are the R voters who would cross over and vote for Bernie, they will either stay at home or come out in droves to vote against her, she has way to much baggage and she has pissed way to many people off to have any real hope of winning a national election...the only reason she has as many delegates as she does is through manipulation by the DNC disenfranchising voters ...

"They" are never an excuse for being a "they" oneself.

As for not getting it, isn't it time you started focusing on the right? There are real evil forces massed over there to smash us and finish their takeover of our nation. Just the presidency alone would enable them to turn SCOTUS right-wing for another 30 years.

Problems I see coming from the so called dems the third way is a joke as far as real dems go, the DNC is a travesty foisting a losing candidate off on the rest of us that really care about the country and it's people so focusing on the right is a long way off for me too much already from my "friends" on the left.... if it wasn't so serious it would be funny.

And I sure as hell don't need advice from a hill fan...Instead of giving me some sort of direction maybe you need to look at your own candidates backyard.

with the Corporate lawyer and you just want to be snarky and not comment on the merits of the article

OK. Now back to Alperstein. Who is she, you ask? Well, she’s a partner at Becker Glynn. And, according to the website, she specializes in

Defending witnesses before the SEC in connection with various investigations involving credit default swaps, CDOs and CLOs.
Defending several hedge funds and a health care company in the Tribune fraudulent conveyance actions.
Defending a holding company and individual against claims for conspiracy to commit fraud in connection with an alleged “pump and dump” market manipulation scheme on London and German stock exchanges.
Defending publicly traded domestic company against wage and hour class action in New York state court.
Advised hedge fund in connection with investigation of Ponzi scheme and corporate governance issues.
Defeated securities fraud class action brought against foreign holding company and individual in District of Massachusetts.

and this lawyers credibility

But the piece is generally chock full of distortions and myths that persist despite lack of evidence: Sanders hasn’t accomplished anything (which is weird because he has and his nickname is the Amendment King); he never compromises (which is even weirder since Alperstein points to examples of compromise in the same piece); has no foreign policy experience (he has more foreign policy experience than Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama did when they ran for first election, was right on Iraq. And Clinton was wrong on Iraq, but to be fair, her being wrong shouldn’t be limited to that one incident. She’s also been wrong on Libya, Haiti and Honduras, where she legitimized a coup that has rendered the country the “murder capital of the world.”)

a damn one of them.

As for Robin's clients, she, like every civil attorney, need only act honorably within the confines of our profession. I don't give a shit who she defends, as long as she plays by the rules. It's lawyers like Greenwald, who commit ethical breaches on behalf of disgusting clients that I worry about.

the people or clients that have hurt these the people, and you haven't refuted anything in the article I posted, so deflect move the goal poat whatever you do and by the way what I posted refutes the credibilty, she lied and was caught but no matter what I post you will deny

Bernie, who is happy to vote with gun manufacturers over Sandy Hook victims. People in glass houses should not throw stones.....

Care to address the FEC letters?

since that is what this post is about, that she lied

Like I give a shit who Robin defends, as long as she plays by the rules? I've defended pedophiles. Does it mean I don't get a say in the political process?

Again......care to address the 3 FEC letters? 'Cause that's shitloads more important than who some attorney represents.

thanks for being honest

person who brought them up represented people you don't like?

3 FEC letters. Crickets.

since i brought it up, your trying to hijack the thread, not letting you off easy

letters. Because it matters not at all who this lawyer represents. The FEC letters are hard cold facts.. .. . That you cannot explain away.

you didn't read the article
very vapid response

care to address the FEC violations?

article about the dishonesty of your favorite corporate lawyer, besides Hillary,
You know Obama criticized Hillary in 2008 for being a corporate lawyer

but among journalists, it's pretty well-known and is called the "Clinton Rules." The Clinton Rules informally state that journalists can say anything they want as long as they say it about the Clintons. This has been going on for over two decades, and it's not going away anytime soon. In fact, it's gotten far worse with Hillary running because women are always held to a higher standard than men in this country.

because any criticism of the Hillary is because she is a woman, what a disrespectful response to the the woman who really are marginalized in our country, the countless women whose lives were devastated by the Welfare reform act, I was raised by a single mother who was and is my strength I am proud to be raising a daughter who calls herself a feminist

so just because we have issues with Hillary it is because of issues not her Gender

in the original source article.

Still can't?

I posted we can play this game all day, but I will be gone for a couple hours,

anything else.....

Still can't address the FEC issue?

sounds like we have a talker who can't back it up

a hijacker with no victim

was about.

Still can't answer on the FEC letters.....maybe Bernie can hire Robin's firm to defend him.

Again.....still can't address the FEC issue......and who would want to?

Reminds me of the Sharpton campaign, and his FEC settlement. Let's hope Bernie has good lawyers.

because that I have been seeing a lot of alerting at DU going on lately

and you're flailing

So short yet so important.

it means that other people probably are feeling the same way, or in some ways identify with the message.

and not all these other people are corporate lawyers.

what a lot of women are feeling.