2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf ny Independants voted Bernie would have won in a landslide
Did Hillary lose every single County out of New York City?
riversedge
(70,242 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)Isn't democracy about VOTES won? Not "counties won."
"The goalposts have been moved so many times, they've got wheels and a jet engine."
~unknown DUer whose name I forgot to remember along with this great quote.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)Sanders supporters since last evening. Reminds me of the GE--when you see all the RED though out the Mid states---the sparsely populated areas--lots of land mass but relatively few voters-population.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Gore like most Democrats did better in densely populated areas. Republicans don't like to live near other people.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The further away from the cities the better Republicans do.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)I was just pointing out, more often than not, it's "other people" who don't want to live near Republicans.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)Bernie did extremely well with Democrats, long-standing Democrats. he wins independant voters by massive margins.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)than Bernie so far, in 17 out of 22 states, I think it is. Most independents, in fact, lean right or left and vote more reliably for the party they lean toward than some of those who belong to parties. (!) And let's face it, among those independents who voted for Bernie are an unidentified number who are trying to take HRC out. We don't know just how many are voting "strategically," but we know it's happening. In any case, perhaps more would have gone for him in NY, but not enough to make a difference.
Please note that modern data collection is compiling lists of who votes for whom, and those lists are purchased by political groups for future campaigns, as well as everyone else (can we FIX this??!!!).
I suspect that is a reason Sanders might regret states with closed primaries -- inability to identify sympathizers among independents for future efforts.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)She won 21 of 27 congressional districts. She won everywhere there are more people than deer.
Response to Codeine (Reply #4)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Response to Codeine (Reply #31)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)And you call yourself a progressive. Lol
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)But, somehow, she will easily win the GE without us.
I guess we'll see.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Democratic party nomination.
Independents can go start their own party if they want.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)And maybe they can form their own message board too.
Sanders is only running as a democrat because it has the structure in place. You either get to take advantage of the structure and accept that it comes with disadvantages (like independents can't vote in the primaries in some states) or you develop your own structure.
He chose option 1, or as I like to call it 'the whining falls on deaf ears' option.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)n/t
RandySF
(58,896 posts)And if you can't win a Democratic primary with Democrars, then you are not going to be the Democratic nominee.
casperthegm
(643 posts)The closed NY primary is a perfect example. In general, HRC supporters see no issue with it being closed, and generally favor that concept. That's fine, but the Democratic party is at a crossroads. 40% of voters are independent. That's larger than both the Democratic party and the GOP. That's an opportunity. But the Democratic party chooses to be exclusive rather than inclusive. That will get you your establishment candidate but will cost you membership in the future as you disenfranchise a large block of voters, particularly young ones. That is how a party continues to slowly die...
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)Allowing independents to vote is simply a courtesy given by some state parties. If people in New York want to have a say in who is nominated from a certain party, then it makes sense that they need to be somehow affiliated.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Also, if you're interested in the Democratic Party then join the Democratic Party. Why should people that have worked and toiled to build the party over the years be sidelines by Johnny-come-Lately fad candidacies?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)[img][/img]
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Your point makes no sense.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)but he did it by margins smaller than Hillary won NYC, and often in counties that had fewer than 5,000 total votes. Look at the map, and wherever there are significant numbers of people, Bernie didn't fare well.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)LexVegas
(6,067 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)She won Nassau and Suffolk County, she won Westchester County, she won Rockland and Orange County.
And she beat the brakes off Bernie in every borough.
So, you know, with the exception of Albany and Binghamton, she won every major population center in New York State (sorry Plattsburgh!).
question everything
(47,486 posts)Once he bows out, he will not call for his supporters to untie behind the nominee. Why should he?
randome
(34,845 posts)And since when did you start reading Sanders' mind?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
DrDan
(20,411 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)than voted for Hillary he would have won.
That didn't happen. But if it had he would have won.
He could still win if he were allowed to use his own math too.
He's not tho. So he's not going to win.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Bernie should have won!
Zynx
(21,328 posts)Of major counties, Bernie only won Albany.