Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York v. The Will of the People. (Original Post) TalkingDog Apr 2016 OP
Aww Michael haz a sad workinclasszero Apr 2016 #1
Well... it was the Democratic primary. DURHAM D Apr 2016 #2
What is stupid is that you don't want Independents for the Primary you just want to USE them bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #3
No, it isn't. Beacool Apr 2016 #9
NO! The rules must be changed. That analogy is so ridiculous: "Independents can vote in the GE." bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #12
Poor l'il poppet Tarc Apr 2016 #17
What in the hell is a "poppet" you people keep making up this weird name calling shit. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #27
Sorry, but Independents should not have a right to decide a party's nominee. Beacool Apr 2016 #18
You know how to change the rules? Win an election. Actually, win *several* elections. baldguy Apr 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Armstead Apr 2016 #26
So it's a private club? Is there a secret initiation ceremony? Armstead Apr 2016 #25
Yes, it is. Beacool Apr 2016 #31
People should be able to make that choice whenever they want Armstead Apr 2016 #35
then the dems won't need indys in the ge either restorefreedom Apr 2016 #30
No one is saying that Independents won't be needed in the GE. Beacool Apr 2016 #33
when it comes to indys, they usually "caucus" with one side or the other restorefreedom Apr 2016 #34
An independent votes for Bernie in the primary equals a vote for him in the GE Armstead Apr 2016 #24
No big deal, not like General Election need Independants or anything. Joob Apr 2016 #4
Now, Joob,. gotta remember to go to the "smilies" and put that sarcasm smilie in there . . . pdsimdars Apr 2016 #19
Ohh haha, well what can I say, I like to live.. dangerously. Joob Apr 2016 #20
Unfortunately, the largest proportion of American voters (i.e. independents) Maedhros Apr 2016 #5
And it's time they were. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #13
We get to vote for the Good Cop, who is still working to put us away...[n/t] Maedhros Apr 2016 #16
Yeah, Michael, that's why it's called a closed primary. Beacool Apr 2016 #6
I was an Independent apcalc Apr 2016 #7
It's not like they spring it on us without warning. "SURPRISE! IT'S AN ELECTION!" auntpurl Apr 2016 #15
That's why it's called a 'Party Nomination'...run a candidate next time. jmg257 Apr 2016 #8
But one would hope they'd make that selection withtheir eyes wide open pdsimdars Apr 2016 #21
Yes...good points. That's what the superdelegates are SUPPOSED TO BE all about I guess. jmg257 Apr 2016 #28
See, Bernie really won NY! Come on people accept defeat with some gace. boston bean Apr 2016 #10
All primaries should be closed, limited to those who registered before the primary season began. Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2016 #11
the level of denial is just pathetic at this point nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #14
For some of us, knixphan Apr 2016 #22
An Independent. What is an Independent. Really it's the same as a Republican or a Democrat. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #29
If they want a say in the party nominee, join the fucking party. Adrahil Apr 2016 #32

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
3. What is stupid is that you don't want Independents for the Primary you just want to USE them
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:21 PM
Apr 2016

for the GE...disgusting. If one person one vote...he would have took the state completely and your group knows that. But here ya go ....and when it's time (and Hillary is already begging) you will say unite throw out hugs and it will be so sickening.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
9. No, it isn't.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:28 PM
Apr 2016

Would you be allowed to vote in a club or church if you're not a member of that club or church? Of course not. This is the primary season. All primaries should be closed. Independents can vote in the GE. Outsiders should not have a say in choosing a party's nominee. Want to vote in a primary? Then have some skin in the game, choose a party and register as a member.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
12. NO! The rules must be changed. That analogy is so ridiculous: "Independents can vote in the GE."
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:40 PM
Apr 2016

But can't vote in a primary. Best person no matter what party is the best person and everyone should have a choice as to who to vote for. Not wait until others pick for them. The system is not what it should be.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
18. Sorry, but Independents should not have a right to decide a party's nominee.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:50 PM
Apr 2016

If they want to vote in a closed primary, then they just need to join a party. That's as it should be.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
23. You know how to change the rules? Win an election. Actually, win *several* elections.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:22 PM
Apr 2016

Why do Berniestas have so much trouble with that initial, essential Step #1?

Response to baldguy (Reply #23)

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
25. So it's a private club? Is there a secret initiation ceremony?
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

It boils down to the selection someone makes at the time they walk into the voting booth. That's all.

Yes, I know, party organization, etc. But even the vast majority of loyal Democrats don't get involved in that.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
31. Yes, it is.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 05:06 PM
Apr 2016

It's not complicated. Want to vote in a primary? Then join the party. Don't want to join any party? Then vote in the GE.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
35. People should be able to make that choice whenever they want
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 06:16 PM
Apr 2016

If someone wants to support a particular candidate and register at the voting booth by voting for the Dem they should have that option.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
30. then the dems won't need indys in the ge either
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

good luck winning against trump without indys. either the dems welcome the support of independents or they don't. independents are not tools in the box only to be taken out and used when necessary. either they are dem allies or they are not.

and hillary has made it clear she does not want us as her allies.

i am more than happy to oblige.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
33. No one is saying that Independents won't be needed in the GE.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 05:08 PM
Apr 2016

That scenario also applies to Republicans. Why should someone be entitled to vote in a party's primary when they are not a member of said party?

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
34. when it comes to indys, they usually "caucus" with one side or the other
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 05:18 PM
Apr 2016

and that support is often critical to success for dems. they should be able to participate and will give them more investment in the alliance as well. as to republicans crossing over, that is more contentious. personally, i believe in completely open primaries, but i understand the concern of those who would not republicans jumping in and playing games.

i think indys are a separate case, though.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
24. An independent votes for Bernie in the primary equals a vote for him in the GE
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:22 PM
Apr 2016

Not a stupid argument if enough independents were allowed to have a choice and if there were enough of them to push Sanders enough to win the nomination.

Joob

(1,065 posts)
4. No big deal, not like General Election need Independants or anything.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:21 PM
Apr 2016

And they certainly won't feel* disfranchised with the Democratic Party after that.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
19. Now, Joob,. gotta remember to go to the "smilies" and put that sarcasm smilie in there . . .
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:15 PM
Apr 2016

it adds a little something . . . . .




it's in the "..." section

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
5. Unfortunately, the largest proportion of American voters (i.e. independents)
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:21 PM
Apr 2016

are unrepresented in our system.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
13. And it's time they were.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:41 PM
Apr 2016

It's always your side or mine. In war their side or ours. This constant it's our side our choice not yours is so old change needs to happen.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
6. Yeah, Michael, that's why it's called a closed primary.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:23 PM
Apr 2016

Want to vote in a closed primary? Then register as a Democrat or Republican and vote for the candidate of your preference. It's not that complicated.

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
7. I was an Independent
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:25 PM
Apr 2016

LAST SUMMER I changed my registration to Democrat.

There was plenty of time to PICK A PARTY and go with it.
I KNEW there was a presidential election coming up....and the others Indies didn't?


auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
15. It's not like they spring it on us without warning. "SURPRISE! IT'S AN ELECTION!"
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016

I feel like this campaign season has been going on for about 5 years.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
8. That's why it's called a 'Party Nomination'...run a candidate next time.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:26 PM
Apr 2016

"a candidate who has been selected by a political party is said to be the party's nominee."

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
21. But one would hope they'd make that selection withtheir eyes wide open
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:20 PM
Apr 2016

giving a thought to the GE. When you have one candidate who has the worst negatives in history and one with the highest. And one who does poorly with the largest voting block in the GE, namely the Independents, and one who regularly gets 70+% of the independent vote. . .

One would think the intelligent party members would take that into consideration, but apparently not so much.

New Democratic party slogan . . . .choose to lose. Kinda rhymes though.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
28. Yes...good points. That's what the superdelegates are SUPPOSED TO BE all about I guess.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:51 PM
Apr 2016

The party's best interests. But with so much...let's say...favoritism...in place, so much 'the establishment', it is no surprise how they turn out.

How about "Keeping Our Fingers Crossed" - bumper sticker worthy!

knixphan

(4,442 posts)
22. For some of us,
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:21 PM
Apr 2016

...this rigged system is more than a football game, or a spat in 'Mean Girls'. For some of us, it actually matters what policies are in place and whether or not a leader will actually fight for what helps us in real life. Independent voters are actual human beings, mostly poor and working class folks.

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
29. An Independent. What is an Independent. Really it's the same as a Republican or a Democrat.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:54 PM
Apr 2016

They want to vote for the person that they feel is the right person to be President. Why should it have to be SCREENED through a party affiliation before they get to choose. I suspect that is why the majority of people prefer to be an Independent. The Party's are trying to disallow that choice if only for themselves. Doesn't seem fair to me. A system where every one has a chance to vote for who they feel is the right person is the real and only fair way to go. I think there will be changes to our system coming.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New York v. The Will of t...