You left out a couple of words or so.

the check cashering buisnesses the new democrats, only support the rich

Look this idea is partially in place now with postal money orders, I use them because people will accept them over checks. expanding the services a little would make the world of difference to someone without a stable address, but if you are happy with people in poverty sinking lower, well that seems to be the new democratic party under D W-S, good luck.

lots of countries do this, but not us. lets not rebuild the democratic party to make it represent the people, we know D W-S said that it wants to support the elites. Progressives, who needs them, kick them out of the party.

I couldn't find anything on it from his time in the Senate.

But - then again he 'knows' this Congress and what piece of shit used car salesmen they are. Fucking assholes who hate America.

So I'm not going to knock him down. I'm not an Indie or Republican and I voted for him twice. I'm thrilled that my dad got to see a black man as President before he died and he's a symbol of pride to me.

You want to knock down Clinton, Trump, Sanders, Cruz, or Kasich - go right ahead. They aren't my President - He is.

American people are making progress due in part to Obama's leadership on the issue.

America needs and deserves strong bold leadership.

Obama is the reason I support single payer. I never even thought about single payer until I heard about it in a speech from Obama.

It was Obama's effort to communicate a better idea that made me a strong supporter of that issue. An issue I never even considered until he mentioned it.

Because there are a lot of untapped opportunities here.

Food deserts already exist throughout our poorest neighborhoods, while Whole Foods only go into affluent neighborhoods.

While we drive up obesity and diabetes numbers to the delight of private health industry investors, why not integrate growth in the debt services?

That's how a Clinton thinks, and that's what will happen.

can save us money.

Anyone who's ever been to the Post Office and spent a long time in line waiting for stamps or to mail a package knows what I'm talking about. You have 6 windows and 2 of them open, and everyone complaining. Now throw into that mix, you now have to provide banking duties on top of that. Talk about a recipe for disaster.

Let me just say that I have worked as cashier at military bases overseas when I was in the military. I also worked for DoD as an Auditor once I left the military. Working around cash is a whole nother animal. Believe me. Back in the day, we only cashed checks, (Paychecks and Personal checks) and sold foreign currency. First of all, anyone handling cash has to be bonded. Then you have to have secure facility, meaning now every Post Office would essentially become a Vault. Then you have to arrange for cash to be picked up and delivered regularly, because your stock constantly needs to be replenished. You then also have to have security for the facility. My daughter also worked in a bank and was an Asst. Branch Manager, and banks even in this day and age get robbed often. When you're only worry about selling stamps and filling out paperwork for packages people want to send across the nation, no problem. As soon as you throw in the mix, opening accounts, cashing checks, verifying that checks are good through the Treasury clearing houses, selling Money Orders, and the mix, by people who are generally low skilled employees (nothing personal, just being realistic) you can expect to run into lots of new problems I'm sure Bernie hasn't though through and it will be more costly, and less productive.

Neoliberals gotta neoliberal.

It worked VERY well. They were forced to stop because of actions by people who are hostile to the United States Post Office and would like to see it fail. The same sort of people have forced the Post Office to assume an outlandish burden in their pension fund. And there are rumors that these groups had other hidden motives for this little maneuver.

#toobigtomail