Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

apnu

(8,758 posts)
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 03:35 PM Apr 2016

Why Voters Could Be Removed From The Rolls

Why Voters Could Be Removed From The Rolls

April 20, 20162:21 PM ET

It certainly looks suspicious that more than 125,000 Democrats were dropped from Brooklyn's voter rolls between last November and Tuesday's primary. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer said that the Board of Elections confirmed the voters were removed and that his office would conduct an audit to see if anything improper was done.

In a statement, Mayor Bill de Blasio called on the New York City Board of Elections to "reverse that purge," adding that "the perception that numerous voters may have been disenfranchised undermines the integrity of the entire electoral process and must be fixed."

And it was an unusually high number of names to be dropped all at once. But Michael Ryan, executive director of the city's elections board, denied anyone was disenfranchised. While more than 100,000 voters were taken off the rolls, he told the New York Times that 63,000 were added and that the decline did not "shock his conscience." He told WNYC that "people die every day and they come off the list," and that New Yorkers move a lot, another reason they might be taken off the rolls.

Indeed, there might very well be a good — and legitimate — explanation for why all those names were removed.

A 2010 study by the Pew Center on the States found that one in eight voter registrations in the U.S. — about 24 million records — were invalid or significantly inaccurate. It found that more than 1.8 million dead people were on the rolls and almost 3 million people were registered in more than one state.

Since then, elections offices around the country have stepped up efforts to clean up their lists. In fact, it's required by federal law that they do so. But there are certain rules they're supposed to follow.


More at link above.

What do you think DU? Could the Brooklyn purge be legit or is it election shenanigans.

I'd like to know more about the people who showed up and could not vote. How many instances of that? I think knowing that will help us find out if this is legitimate election fraud or not. Does anybody know?
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
2. I do not believe in huge conspiracies that require dozens or hundreds of people to stay silent
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 03:38 PM
Apr 2016

for the rest of their natural lives.
I do believe that bureaucracies of all kinds are inefficient and often ham-handed.
New York should investigate, find what happened, and fix it.
That is how things are made better.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
3. There are multiple vaild reasons to be removed from voting rolls, several mentioned in the article
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 03:52 PM
Apr 2016

• Death (pretty obvious)
• Moving and not updating your voter registration
• Not voting in a couple of consecutive elections

Where I live now, the registrar of voters sends a card with my voter information to my address a couple of months before every primary or general election. If that card gets returned, I believe my record would get marked bad address.

In a state I used to live, if I didn't vote in a couple of general or primary elections in a row I would get marked inactive (I think the count was 3).

Whenever they finally get around to purging the rolls, anyone that is marked dead, bad address or inactive would get purged and for a valid reason. I don't know how often they purge, but when they do, I would have to suspect a good percentage does get dropped.

apnu

(8,758 posts)
4. Good points.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 04:04 PM
Apr 2016

In Chicago, where I vote, I don't have any problems. However I make a point of voting in every possible election that goes by. Which probably keeps me fresh and up to date on the rolls. Cook County BoE sends me a little card every election year telling me my polling place and other information so I know I'm good.

I think Bernie has energized a lot of first timers or others who've sat on the sidelines for a while and now are rushing to take part, which is exposing all kinds of problems with the rolls and our patchwork primary process. I also think that with emotions running so high, Bernie is so much closer than anybody ever dreamed, that makes people reactionary and likely to believe whatever idea feeds their emotional state. Hence so many people accusing Hillary of our right election theft when there's no proof, nor even a good rumor of it at all.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Voters Could Be Remov...