Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolitiFact rates Bernie's voter turnout claims 'Mostly False'
PolitiFact rates Bernie's voter turnout claims 'Mostly False'
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-voter-turnout-politifact-222138
By Nick Gass
04/19/16 11:08 AM EDT
It is one of Bernie Sanders' most repeated lines on the trail: "We win when voter turnout is high, we lose when it is low," he often says, particularly in the run-up to caucuses and primaries, such as the one in delegate-rich New York on Tuesday.
But that claim is "Mostly False," according to a fact check and analysis by PolitiFact published Tuesday, finding that while the Vermont senator has won several states thanks to large turnout, his overall argument is "pretty thin."
..........
Sanders also won the contests with the 10 lowest turnouts, all caucuses: Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, Washington state and Wyoming.
"Ignoring the large number of low-turnout caucuses Sanders won would be cherry-picking," the article continues, noting that the average turnout rate for a state Clinton carried is 44 percent, while the average turnout for a Sanders victory is just 31 percent.
.....................
"The statement contains some element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False," the analysis concludes.
Authors:
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-voter-turnout-politifact-222138#ixzz46Po4tope
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 857 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PolitiFact rates Bernie's voter turnout claims 'Mostly False' (Original Post)
riversedge
Apr 2016
OP
Yup. This is what really reminds me of the Bushco years and their supporters. Nt.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#8
The turnout at the Washington Caucus was essentially the same as 2008... a record turnout.
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2016
#6
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)1. kick and rec... for truth. nt
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)2. Oh, Another lie from the campaign of integrity? So many.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)5. non-stop coast to coast
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)8. Yup. This is what really reminds me of the Bushco years and their supporters. Nt.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)3. Did you have to dig this one up?
Already disproved the source yesterday. They even had our statess voter turn out wrong.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)4. Hillary supporters are to GOTV
What cancer is to longevity
msongs
(67,413 posts)10. hillary is winning and bernie is losing. GOTV problems in the bernie camp? nt
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)6. The turnout at the Washington Caucus was essentially the same as 2008... a record turnout.
Caucuses don't experience the same turnout for a simple reason: caucuses take time.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)7. uh-oh, UH-OH. You've done it now. Here they come with your stake and the torches. Would you prefer
an accellerant with your fire? You die quicker. Bernie fans have a special fury for heretics!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)9. Yup. We knew that...nice to see it getting coverage. He does well in small
caucus states when all Dems can't participate.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)11. I can't criticize him about this
It's always good to promote as much voting as possible, even if it doesn't always indicate whether he'll win or not.
RandySF
(58,884 posts)12. K&R