2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo how many Hillary haters do you figure we need to convince
to vote for her to win the GE?
I don't think we need to convince one of them. But many have a much different opinion than I.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)If Trump wins, there will be Cruz haters who won't vote for Trump. The fringes always nullify each other. Not a particular concern to me.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Further, that energy invested in them is almost always entirely wasted and could be so much better, and more pleasantly, invested elsewhere. Best to respect that they mean it when they say they will not be changing their minds.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)What cancer is to longevity
boston bean
(36,221 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The answer is: Hillary supporters are to GOTV what Kryptonite is to Superman.
Is that more clear?
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Good job!
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)to vote for him to win the GE?
I don't think we need to convince one of them. But many have a much different opinion than I.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)FIFY
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Do you think it's OK to shut up Bernie supporters before he concedes?
What if it was Hillary supporters being asked to shut up...call it for Bernie?
Squinch
(50,950 posts)but we will win with or without you.
And yes, I know you think you are legion, but you aren't.
So make up your mind, but spare us the threats and histrionics. No one of us, nor any few of us, decides this. It is the ones who are willing to stick together. Many Sanders supporters have already told us they will not do that. So they have made themselves irrelevant.
So whatever you decide, quit with the drama and get on with it.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You see, I have always said I'd hold my nose and vote for Clinton, but when you cast me out like garbage, mabye that will make me think twice.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Good job.
Aside from her being a corporate shill....of course.
msongs
(67,412 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Of what I'm talking about
boston bean
(36,221 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So yes you are correct. Calling for purges does not GOTV.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Vote for her or don't.
There isn't one thing anyone can do to convince you otherwise. Just admit that. And we can move on.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Right wing does that to people... .
boston bean
(36,221 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They must thing GOTV means purge voters OUT of the party...
It's all they know...
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)The post that implied we'd be going elsewhere to post if we are shut out here.
That's not a purge? Not forced purges but forced silence.
How about we wait till a winner is declared before we start kicking each other off the forum.
I know some of you guys would love to see Bernie supporters leave, I just don't know if you'd be happy with the results. A one-sided conversations, and a dead forum isn't much fun to participate in.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)party member? Maybe Sanders will start a new party and you can join up. I hear a Unicorn for a mascot is available.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)101
Squinch
(50,950 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Right wing and civility do not go hand in hand
Squinch
(50,950 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Until that happens there will be a stead stream of disgruntled leftists exiting the Democratic party
Squinch
(50,950 posts)There is no upside to appeasing them. They have already made it clear that they could never vote for her. So they are now irrelevant.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Deluded right wing Hill-think
Squinch
(50,950 posts)We know you will think that is stupid. But the fact that you think that doesn't matter.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Hill-think
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)the OP is clearly stating that the Bernie or Bust crowd deserve to have their wishes acknowledged. They are a difficult crowd to convince to vote for Hillary, and are very unlikely to turn their vote. So leave them to their own devices. I agree. How is that purging?
Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)considering he was known by 3% of Americans to losing many states? Think Hillary is electrifying the youth vote? Doesn't appear so. Sanders brought youth to the party and it's up to the democrats to keep them interested. With Hillary they won't. They aren't lining up behind sanders because they want more of the same.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)a known entity for thirty years compared to a person known by 3% and she can't close this out. Kind of speaks volumes if you ask me.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)After all in Hillary's words " Bobby Kennedy got shot in June" with this FBI thing he needs to stay in.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)but you should've had a ton of free time ignoring the issues if you are voting for Hillary.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)We understand that you hate Hillary. We know you are pledged to never vote for her. But it just doesn't matter.
Do what you have to do, give your last breath for Sanders. But - and this is not snark it's just reality - no one is going to care. The rest of the world has moved on to the General Election.
Your war is over. Your enemy has gone home.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)He has already won many things, the message being one of them. we realize he won the message the moment Hillary had amazing evolutions she never held before. They somehow were almost identical to the Sanders campaign platform. You know this, but like research, avoided making the connection.
He also has started a new found activism that Hillary would've never inspired. She and her kind do not want activism, they want subjects. You will find this out with the hard lurch to the right coming soon. Will I be able to tell you I told you so? Possibly, if not though, the continuation of the bubble some reside will then begin making excuses for the flip flop of her newest found platform.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)when one refuses to examine things. But you know that. Have a good evening.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Haters are just that, they hate.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)GET.OUT THAT VOTE!
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I'm pretty sure that is the only party purging gong on here. in fact, I've seen several other posts stating that is exactly what they intend to do.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Just let them stay home. We'll vote.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)that's a 53% to 47% result. Note, this is without ANY votes from Bernie fans! Of course, this is without the NY primary results.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)You can tell why that would make a huge difference.
artislife
(9,497 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)That should be interesting.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... and crunching the figures, I came up with the appropriate number: zero.
Either you want to see a Democrat elected POTUS, or you don't. It's as simple as that. And those who don't are not worth a minute of anyone's time or effort.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Why waste time on that nonsense.
PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)Am I right in thinking that? I'll be generous and double that for the remaining states. So she has, what, 15 % of votes? You tthink tthat's sufficient?
Squinch
(50,950 posts)PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)Is my math wrong? It is late at night. What exactly are you objecting to?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)It's a waste to try and convince you any differently.
This is something you will have to come to terms with yourself.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)It would be a waste of our time and resources to try and bring you into the fold. So we move on.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)My vote isn't for sale. Threats won't work. Cries, of "not as bad" are past their shelf date.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)I mean no offense when I say that at this point, none of us really cares why you won't vote for her. We don't have any interest in threatening you, and no one seems anxious to expend the effort to try and change your mind, because we believe you. You won't vote for her. You are irrelevant to us. I know that will sound like snark, but it is not. It is simply a statement of how things are now.
You think one thing, we think the other. We have come to a parting of the ways. There is no need for further discussion of it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Although, your use of "we" a bit grandiose.
Response to boston bean (Reply #18)
Ed Suspicious This message was self-deleted by its author.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)But, I'd still vote for him because Trump is a racist bigot.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)never going to vote for her anyway.
They'll start to spend more time on other websites trashing her once they can't rat fuck here anymore.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Why other websites? Why not here? Will only praise be allowed? Is this a political discussion site or a cheerleader tryout?
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Perhaps, with some examples of "trashing" Hillary.
"Poor Hillary, for a supposedly strong candidate, she seems particularly thin skinned when criticized." Criticism? Commentary? Observation? Trash?
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)It was you who used the word "trashing".
Squinch
(50,950 posts)looking for fodder for argument?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)This is a political discussion board. You may notice that arguments often occur between opponents. What do you expect? Only polite applause? No questions? No challenges? Agreement?
Good luck.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Read the TOS and you will see that, yes, agreement is expected with respect to the Democratic candidate.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Is there an Oath involved in this requirement? Contract to be signed? Punishment to be meted out?
Why not just talk about biscuit recipes or the color of tulips? Perhaps...the weather in Sierra Leone? No...too political and it may have something to do with fracking.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)are you trying to fight with me about it?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I'm responding to you and your posts.
I've read the TOS and find nothing in it that dictates that we can't criticize Democrats. Even Hillary.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Okay then.
You really seem to want a fight. I don't. You go ahead and rake Hillary over the coals. Or don't. I really don't care.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And, you use circular arguments to defend your threats.
i.e.:
"Don't say that!"
"Say what?"
"Say that!"
"What's 'that""?
"Ask somebody else what "that" is".
Squinch
(50,950 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And you don't even have a transparency page to look at. Are they winning you over?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And from my perspective, that sets up an interesting observational experiment.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)The right wing is gonna vote right wing.
Here on this site, SOME (not all) keep asking 'What does she stand for?' 'I don't know her policy positions?+1???'
So I tried referring people to her web site, which spells out her policy positions very clearly.
Then they ask 'oh no I want to hear it in your own words.' Then I tell them why.
Then they reply with 'I don't believe her or you!!!+++111'
They've been mainlining haterade for so long that they don't believe anything or anyone who doesn't buy all the right wing lies about the Clintons.
It's like talking with a fundamentalist, or a brick wall. Or a troll.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)We don't believe her policy positions, since most of them have been formed in response to the enormous attention Bernie has gotten on his policy positions...which he's been for all along.
Hillary, not so much. She has definitely swung far left because of Bernie, but I don't believe she will follow through if she wins. She will revert back to her admitted moderate self if she wins.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)it with you? Why would we care about that opinion you just gave? And for that matter, why would you feel the need to give it?
This may sound like snark, but seriously, it isn't. It's just that we should all acknowledge that we have come to a parting of the ways, and for those of us who want to support the candidate, we should acknowledge this quickly and move on.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Because I never said I wouldn't vote for her.
But I'm not ready to concede before Bernie does.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I wish I could say the same, but I can't. I don't talk to people the way you do. I don't assume things they've never said, and tried to throw them out with the trash.
I've never asked or partied at the thought of Hillary supporters leaving this forum because they don't support my candidate.
I've seen an awful lot of that from Hill camp.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)take it back to the Hillary group here where Bernie supporters and Bernie are continuously trashed. Take it to the off-sight Hillary forum that is locked so we can't read the ugly things you all say about us behind our backs...or take it to the absolutely hateful Jackass radicals forum where you mock everyone who finally found a safe and open forum for Bernie supporters. A forum where we can talk about Bernie and Hillary, but topics related to Hillary supporters here are discouraged, strongly, and nothing is locked. It's wide open for all to see. Because our aim was to support Bernie, not tear this forum apart.
You tell me which side is the open and welcoming party. And keep your olive branch. You will need it if Hillary wins.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You have a nice night too.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Because you won't get any votes from us.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)We'll handle it.
You can move on.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)No deals with or attempt to Pander to the Paul contingent in any way.
But I want as many from the left as possible.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Kicking and screaming, but we will vote for her if we have to.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Good grief...get a handle on it.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)super delegates?
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Consider Wisconsin. Bernie took 500,000 votes - in the primary. In 2012 Obama only won Wisconsin by 233,000 votes.
Of course, not all Bernie supporters are Clinton haters, but not all Clinton haters voted in the primary either.
I think she is tough to beat, but nothing is guaranteed either. Here's one prediction showing 257 for a Dem, 191 for Republicans and 90 toss ups. Get nasty enough and a few more states could be toss ups, or losses. Republicans need four of the five toss ups to win, but less if other states come into play. http://uselectionatlas.org/PRED/PRESIDENT/2016/pred.php
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)They're nicer and infinitely more reasonable.
ismnotwasm
(41,986 posts)I don't do futility. I also don't care--If someone hates her they hate her. Not wasting my time.
However, I do try, with conversation and truth telling, to convince non-Hillary haters who may prefer another candidate. I did that just today. I started with a question "What would it take to overturn Citizen United?".
She didn't know, which was not at all surprising, and the conversation just got better from there.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)the independents. They just won't vote for her.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I long for the 5 ban hide for toxic disruptors
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)There's nothing you could add that isn't already viewed as bs. You seem confident we're a tiny minority, so don't sweat it.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Except I do think you are in a small minority.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Good luck.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)But DU is just a microcom...and it's actually one where Clinton critics are still more likely to support her out of dread of the GOP than in the general pubic.
The real issue is how many Bernie supporters in the larger population....along with overall less fire up Dems and independents.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)NOTHING AT ALL like the ones I encounter here. I like them, they like me, we get along fine. They happen to prefer Bernie (at last check) and they've said they'd vote for Hillary.
This place is just weird. Nothing at all like real life.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)You may be too.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Many of the independents, especially those who aren't especially political but don't like the idea of being "punished" for having abortions and all the other idiotic things Trump represents, they'll come around too.
The extreme left independents who seem to be dominating this website and social media (and particularly, the abuse being heaped onto the social media pages of super delegates), were never ours to begin with. They were always going to be for Jill Stein if there hadn't been a Bernie the same way they've been for Nader and every other super-duper-leftist all along. We can't complain about losing what we never had to begin with.
I wouldn't worry about the general. Trump has a small chance and Cruz even less of one.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Good luck in the general with that POV. Perhaps it's spending too much time in the secret Hillary Group that gives such illusions of grandeur.
Now, I'm not saying you will lose all Bernie supporters or Independents, or young people, but I am saying that it's altogether possible. Particularly with the lack of value being placed on their feelings and POV.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)if Bernie is the not the nominee? None of them will vote for Hillary? Are you sure about that?
See, that's exactly the misconstrued and misinterpreted polling misinformation that is so annoying.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Kindly go back and read over what I said, all of it, consider whether I actually claimed ALL Sander's supporters would defect. Thank you.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)who gives a shit. If looking at what the republicans have to offer as a presidential candidate doesn't give someone pause then they aren't worth convincing.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Most of the people supporting Bernie
will vote for Hillary in Novemebr.
By September Bernies revolution will be a footnote.
The youth vote isn't known for their extra long attention spans.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)There is nothing anyone else can say.
nini
(16,672 posts)They understand no vote is a vote for Trump and they won't do that.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Either they give a shit about their own family enough to stop him or they throw their loved ones to the wolves, what the **** ever!
Its an easy choice for me.
I'm not holding any crybabies hands!
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)and definitely seem to be unique to this election. Everyone should vote for whomever they want. Each of us has to live with the consequences of our own choices.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,009 posts)He, Weaver and Devine trashed the Democratic Party, the Democratic Primary elections, and they trashed Hillary.
Bernie's campaign was not based on uplifting Democrats. It was based on impugning Democrats. He will have ended his campaign without once having helped the state party organizations or candidates. It is on him to unpoison the well.
Response to boston bean (Original post)
Post removed
MFM008
(19,814 posts)so I dont.
artislife
(9,497 posts)that's for sure.
Response to boston bean (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Response to Sheepshank (Reply #113)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)give a shit. They will vote for Hillary.
The most vocal here are made up of some true believers, who sadly we will lose. But they are a small percentage. Then there are the trolls. They were never going to vote for Hillary anyway.
So the number we lose is small. They have chosen to make themselves irrelevant. We do not have the time to waste on them, and we certainly should not waste any resources on them. We should wish them well and hand them their hats.
They will be easily replaced by those Republicans who were never comfortable with the tea party, who may hate Democratic values but who recognize that a Trump presidency will probably be the cause for World War 3, just because he is so stupid.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)up a record cross-over vote if Cruz or Trump is the GOP nominee.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)about a riot, but falling in behind is their more usual mode and there's a lot of time to calm down between the convention and November.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)I'm sure you've seen that copy of the 1957 Republican Platform. They were a good party at one time. I liked everything on that platform. It's really tragic what they have descended into.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The GOP had a lot of us, and we had the Southern Democrats who eventually defined the GOP base. I was glad to see them leave the Democratic Party, but we can't control them now, or protect them from the manipulations of the locusts.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I wish it covered 2015-16. What was happening in 1951, I wonder? I looked at a simple timeline, and the Korean War was going badly, China acting scary, red scare, McCarthy era. The UN opened, but that probably only shook the John Birchers.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)say that the Jefferson v Adams campaign was filthy and there was no middle ground with the factions.
I have to look to see what made that polarization go away.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...Oh well their loss. Idiots.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)won't be with us there, there is no reason to discuss it further.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)And I don't think there are a lot of haters in the real world
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)of Sanders supporters seem to be just fine with Hillary being the nominee. The GOP'ers running from Trump will be a bonus.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)convince to vote for her. True haters won't, although what people like you simply don't understand is that a person doesn't have to hate Hillary to understand that she is a truly terrible choice for President, that she'll cheerfully make cuts in Social Security and Medicare, "compromise" on abortion rights, happily roll back minimum wage and outsource as many jobs as possible.
Personally, I'm done with voting for anyone who doesn't represent me in some substantial way. The lesser of two evils is still evil.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)It's the critical thinking Sanders supporters who have had enough of the rigged game that should worry you.
And guess what, bean, posts like this just increase the number of people who will never vote for Hillary. With supporters like you, the GOP is going save all kinds of money fighting her in the general election if she wins the nomination.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I trust my family members. After what my SIL said happened at polls when he voted, and his comment to me,"It's rigged", I will have to think very hard if this will be the first Presidential Election that I will not vote in in over 30 years.
I accepted the fact that Sanders can lose to Hillary. I was willing to cast my vote for Hillary, who I voted for as my NY Senator, as a vote against Republican Donald Trump. It would not be the first time in all those years that I voted against a candidate more than for one. Before the NY Primary, I thought my fellow Sanders supporters were crazy for saying they would not vote in the General if Hillary was the nominee.
After all the voting irregularities, hundreds of thousands of registered Democrats (a friend being one) being denied the vote, poll workers telling voters to VOTE FOR HILLARY (SIL heard that himself), I am sick to my stomach over this. These are tactics REPUBLICANS use against DEMOCRATS, not Democrats against Democrats. I have seen all this living in Florida with a Republican Governor and Republican controlled legislature. The Party will not be united if this is what it is coming to. Perhaps, the Party needs to learn a lesson from this; President Trump, who I personally despise, far, far more than Hillary Clinton who I merely dislike and disagree with.
I have until November to decide whether to follow the Party line or go with my conscience and stay home.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)dr60omg
(283 posts)just because he brought people into the party does not mean they will be sheepdogged and vote for her.
The largest group of voters in the US are neither Democrats or Republicans but independents and if Clinton wants to win she has to attract independents
She also has to attract progressives, leftists, socialists, democratic socialists, etc etc and that will never happen
Mostly people will just stay home if she is the nominee
rickford66
(5,523 posts)We just prefer a candidate with Democratic values, not Republican Lite. Hillary may win the nomination and may win the GE, but she'd be no different than Bob Dole.
Gothmog
(145,291 posts)Sarah Palin changed that just as either Trump or Carnival Cruz will change the minds of the Clinton haters in November
basselope
(2,565 posts)Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)We don't need to worry about them. Also, I would not waste my time with this sort. Let them sit in their Mom's basement and pout.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)In this case, I think you'd be happy either way because a loss would reinforce your "america hates women" narrative.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)when Independents and Millennials stay home, Issues oriented Bernie supporters vote 3rd Party,
and Republicans turn out on hordes, swarms, and zombie invasions to vote AGAINST Hillary,
and THEN you will be crying to a different tune and trying to blame everybody but yourself.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)...have a negative opinion of Hillary Clinton.
See all the polls that show dislike of Clinton, in a table:
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating
----
And the same % range don't trust her. (This one is 56% for both dislike and distrust):
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/08/hillary-clintons-honest-and-trustworthy-numbers-are-lower-than-ever-it-might-not-matter/
----
Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is viewed as the least honest and trustworthy of all Democratic and Republican candidates, according to the latest YouGov poll.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/17/poll-hillary-clinton-least-honest-and-trustworthy-of-all-presidential-candidates/
-----
Of those who dislike and distrust her but don't hate her (no one's done a poll on actual hate that I know of), who can you convince to stop disliking and distrusting her and vote for her in the GE, and how can you do it?
Well, throw out those who hate her if you can identify them. They won't be convincible. But you do have to factor them in, as to what % of people you need to "turn" in order to win the election, cuz hatred is going to bring people out of the woodwork to vote against her.
There also may be degrees of hate--loathing, disgust, nausea, and people who pay attention to issues and hate war, corporatism, corruption, "regime change," slush funds, etc. They won't be convincible either but they will be strongly motivated to vote. But, comfort yourself, they won't have a feasible alternative and will probably 'throw away' their vote on a write-in of Sanders or vote for Jill Stein.
Obviously, you need to go for the soft dislikes and distrusts. How to identify them? (And also how to determine if they are likely voters.) Start with the women. But first you have to firm up Clinton's position on abortion, and maybe get her to express sorrow over the murder of Berta Caceras and other women in Honduras. Show she really cares about the fascist thugs she put in power raping and murdering peaceful women democracy and environmental activists. (It's mostly women who are leading that movement in Honduras.) Or maybe go for 'christian' right women who may approve any kind of limit on abortions that they can get (Clinton willing to compromise on 3rd trimester) and who like war and want more a-rabs kilt. Could maybe "turn" some of them. Give one of their more innocuous sounding non-profits a Clinton Foundation grant or two, and who knows?
Let's see, who else? Soft dislike and distrust. Hm-m.
You know, you've set yourself a really difficult task, and I'm getting tired trying to figure it out for you. Why don't you consider an alliance with ES&S instead? That would easier and, while it would probably cost more, you won't have to bother with talking to riff-raff.