2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’ Superdelegate Plan Puts His Progressive Base In A Bind
By Amanda Terkel, Sam Stein
WASHINGTON A day after Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) lost the New York primary election that he desperately needed to win, there were no signs that he would dial back his campaign against Hillary Clinton before the Democratic convention in July.
Mark Longabaugh, a top aide to the senator, told The Huffington Post that Sanders is prepared to stay in the race even if it becomes clear that Clinton has a majority of the pledged delegates and an insurmountable lead after the final primary on June 7.
The strategy outlined by Longabaugh echoed the case made the night before by Sanders campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, who told MSNBC that the campaign will try to flip superdelegates away from Clinton before the convention. Neither candidate, Longabaugh argued, will have enough pledged delegates to secure the presidential nomination without the help of superdelegates. The latter officials will then have to decide which candidate gives the party the best shot to win in November. Sanders and his aides believe they have the better case.
We intend to go to the convention and make the superdelegates vote, Longabaugh said.
Whether overconfidence or merely a bluff, the posture of the Sanders campaign creates a delicate dynamic for Democrats hoping for a relatively quiet end to the primary season. It also puts many of Sanders supporters in a difficult position, since they have been the ones demanding that superdelegates stick by the candidate who heads into the convention with the most votes.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-superdelegates_us_5717eb61e4b024dae4f0ec60
Squinch
(50,950 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)elect, and have been calling corrupt is looney tunes time. And they wonder why many people aren't taking them seriously anymore.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)despite losing both the popular vote and pledged delegate count is not a progressive, but rather an unprincipled cultist and/or nihilist.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,009 posts)the most absurd shit to their supporters and get away with it. They are really doing a disservice to their supporters.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)the states were silly. That is as silly a standard as any other with the supers and wouldn't get Bernie very far.
Of course, this plan won't work either.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)" Sanders supporters .... have been the ones demanding that superdelegates stick by the candidate who heads into the convention with the most votes." Do the writers mean the national popular vote total or the most votes in a caucus or popular vote in each state? The writers don't say. They are not clear on this. Is that because they are novice writers? I don't think so.
amborin
(16,631 posts)this, for example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511628221
second, she got all the supers from the very start, BEFORE the primary process even started! how is that OK???? it's not OK!
The express purpose of the supers is for the establishment to be able to weigh in on the process---not democratic, granted
But part of the establishment weighing in is to select a candidate with the greatest chance of defeating the GOP candidate
and so far, polls show that is NOT HRC
so it's totally fair to wait until the convention and see the picture then; and supers are supposed to move to the candidate withthe best chance of winning; usually, that's the candidate with the most pledged delegates, but not necessarily