Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 2000, they "neo-conned" Gore into conceding for unity's sake. Trust me it ain't happening again. (Original Post) dinkytron Apr 2016 OP
Your statement is historically inaccurate. In Gore's own words: Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1
Fair enough. I stand corrected But under pressure he did screw up the recount strategy dinkytron Apr 2016 #2
Gore was wrong. grasswire Apr 2016 #3
I haven't seen any indication Gore ever intended to run again. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #5
He was wrong. grasswire Apr 2016 #7
For Gore, the Rule of Law was important. He did the right thing. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #8
Don't be so hard on yourself, Agnosticsherbet Aerows Apr 2016 #18
That is a typo to remember. LOL Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #23
He may have followed the rule of law Depaysement Apr 2016 #28
See post 31 as to why Gore would not have been elected had the Election Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #33
Absolutely right. bjo59 Apr 2016 #6
NO Later Date For Bernie... Stay In And Expose Hillary For WHO SHE REALLY IS... To The Bitter END! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #41
He bowed before the Powers That Be when they told him to sit down and shut up. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #10
He chose non violence, because violent revolution leads to tyranny and a lot of dead bodies. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #12
And letting the Powers That Be choose the President only leads to slavery. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #14
yup, because no one died due to bushco lakeguy Apr 2016 #27
He said there is nothing that could have been done short of a violent revolution. That's the rhett o rick Apr 2016 #29
See Post 31 where I explain why Gore would never have been elected Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #32
Gore betrayed the nation with those words. pat_k Apr 2016 #25
The 12th amendment proves Gore would have lost. Your theory is historically false. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #31
Not my "theory" -- Justice Breyer's. And not wrong. pat_k Apr 2016 #36
Thank you. You and Gandhi said it better than I am able. I think some use pragmatism or the rhett o rick Apr 2016 #37
Funny thing, I just posted something in... pat_k Apr 2016 #39
And it would have made no difference. Check who had control of the House and the Senate. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #42
See Post 31 as to why Gore would never have been President. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #34
Gore won. Sanders is losing, and it will only get worse. nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #4
Yes, it will get worse. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #9
Buckle up. grasswire Apr 2016 #11
There goes the coveted The Intercept endorsement nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #15
Some of us Democrats still care about the bill of rights, indeed. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #16
Yes, only you pious few care about the constitution nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #17
No, not a pious few. Many of us. Just not you. As you have made abundantly clear. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #19
oh great and wise dudebro, thank you for putting me geek tragedy Apr 2016 #21
Please do not assume my gender. Thanks. n/t JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #22
Progressives care about the Constitution while conservatives care about greed. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #43
It's not over. We will fight against the Big Money domination of our government that the rhett o rick Apr 2016 #13
All the way to the convention! And then the courts. Oooh, the "discovery" is dinkytron Apr 2016 #20
I agree it will get worse as the Ruling Class loots more and more of our resources. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #30
Especially if you are seeking an abortion on demand. closeupready Apr 2016 #40
This is a primary Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #24
THANK YOU. auntpurl Apr 2016 #35
And Al Gore isn't running, we know. Apparently you missed the point of the OP. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #38
No, it's not happening again. This time we won't allow the winner to get robbed... lunamagica Apr 2016 #26
Point to Bernie Sanders' challenge of the New York results...or any other State... brooklynite Apr 2016 #44

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
1. Your statement is historically inaccurate. In Gore's own words:
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:25 AM
Apr 2016

"There is no intermediate step between a final Supreme Court decision and a violent revolution. what was best for the country, the answer was very simple, to respect the rule of law and avoid undermining it and dragging the court into a partisan squabble where the outcome would not change in any case. So I am going to stand by my decision to respect the judiciary,"

Al Gore respected the rule of law and did not choose not to move to violent revolution.

He did not concede for unity. He conceded because there was no other recourse after the Supreme Court made its terrible decision.

dinkytron

(568 posts)
2. Fair enough. I stand corrected But under pressure he did screw up the recount strategy
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:29 AM
Apr 2016

by not requesting a total recount which would have changed e everything. Thanks for the fact check.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
3. Gore was wrong.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:31 AM
Apr 2016

He betrayed future generations, in order to preserve his own "electability" at some later date (which did not come).

He should have forced them to take from him by running all the options. He asked the Congressional Black Caucus to step back.

He was wrong.

Never again.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
5. I haven't seen any indication Gore ever intended to run again.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:35 AM
Apr 2016

In Gore's own words, there simply was not recourse once the Supreme Court ruled.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
7. He was wrong.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:39 AM
Apr 2016

He may not have PLANNED to run again, but part of the Bushie taunts to him were that he needed to concede to "be a statesman" and protect his legacy. That struck him deeply.

Do you remember "Sore Loserman"?? Wingnuts gathered outside the VP residence for days and hollered that at him, and "Get out of Cheney's house!!!" And beat drums and pots and pans.

He should not have capitulated.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
8. For Gore, the Rule of Law was important. He did the right thing.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:42 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:02 AM - Edit history (1)

As he said, there was no other recourse.

Yes, I do remember.

It was one of the more unpleasant moments in our history.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
18. Don't be so hard on yourself, Agnosticsherbet
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:58 AM
Apr 2016

You really aren't one of the more unpleasant moments in our history. I think for the most part you are pretty pleasant.

(sorry, that typo struck me as hilarious)

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
28. He may have followed the rule of law
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 04:09 AM
Apr 2016

Pity the Supreme Court didn't.

Gore, coaxed by Warren Christopher and others, wound up legitimizing one of the worst Presidents in U.S. history.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
10. He bowed before the Powers That Be when they told him to sit down and shut up.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:45 AM
Apr 2016

He was a coward and let the country down. He respected those in power and not the system that was being destroyed.

The longer you hold us down the more violent the revolution.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
12. He chose non violence, because violent revolution leads to tyranny and a lot of dead bodies.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:47 AM
Apr 2016

have a good night.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
14. And letting the Powers That Be choose the President only leads to slavery.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:49 AM
Apr 2016

He was part of the corrupt culture that we must overthrow. I hope violence isn't needed but that hope is fading. You can't beat us down forever.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
29. He said there is nothing that could have been done short of a violent revolution. That's the
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:55 AM
Apr 2016

coward's way of rationalizing the 8 fucking years we had under Bush. And even now, some Democrats choose to live under the thumb of the Ruling Class because they are afraid to fight for their freedoms. Gore knew that if we didn't do something then to address the stealing of the presidency, it would only get worse and worse. But he is one of the Ruling Class and the consequences didn't hurt him one bit. His wealth probably like the Clintons. Profiting on the suffering of others.

We have 16 million children living in poverty and another 16 million living in low income homes. We have 2.5 million homeless American children. We have more infants die before the age of 1 year than any other modern country. We have over 1.5 million people incarcerated and millions more felons out of prison that cant find employment.

How bad must it get before you are willing to stand up and fight?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
32. See Post 31 where I explain why Gore would never have been elected
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:20 AM
Apr 2016

had the election been thrown to the US Congress.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
25. Gore betrayed the nation with those words.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:34 AM
Apr 2016

In Bush v. Gore, Justice Breyer told the nation -- and Gore -- exactly what needed to happen. As he noted in his dissent, the Electoral Count Act makes it the duty of Congress to ultimately resolve such a situation. In quoting the legislative history, he cites that:

They can only count legal votes, and in doing so must determine, from the best evidence to be had, what are legal votes…


And further that:

The power to judge of the legality of the votes is a necessary consequent of the power to count. The existence of this power is of absolute necessity to the preservation of the Government."


Bush v. Gore, J.Breyer dissent (11) December 12, 2000


Justice Breyer was explicitly instructing Congress as to what their duty was -- to object to, and reject, the unlawfully appointed Florida electors on January 6th, 2001.

If he respected the rule of law, Gore would have called on Congress to do it's duty.

He failed to stand up to preserve the integrity of our government. Had he not betrayed us with his concession, we would be living in a very different world. I believe a better one.

And January 6th, 2001 would have looked much different than this:



Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
31. The 12th amendment proves Gore would have lost. Your theory is historically false.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:18 AM
Apr 2016

If no candidate for President has enough electoral votes to reach the magic number, the election of the President goes to the House of Representatives, but not before March 1st. Republicans controlled the House on March 1st 2001. Bush would have been elected by Republicans in the House.

Of course, all that hinged on the notion that no candidate had won the requisite numbers in the electoral college. Bush V. Gore handed the Presidency to George W. Bush that majority. Had it actually gone to a vote in the House, Bush would have been elected by Republicans in the House.

The whole notion that Gore could have somehow fought and been elected is absolutely false. It has no Constitutional or historical basis. It is a fantasy.

Gore, of course, knew that. His only recourse to lead a violent revolution, which would have failed and led to the needless death, and would still have failed.

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate.

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted.

The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.[Note 1]

The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.[1]

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
36. Not my "theory" -- Justice Breyer's. And not wrong.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:29 PM
Apr 2016

Nothing to do with "magic number." When the appointment of a slate of electors is rejected as unlawful, they are no longer counted among the "appointed."

Talk to Barbara Boxer about it. She stood with Stephanie Tubbs Jones to object to the Ohio electors in 2004.

The final outcome is irrelevant. In the face of such colossal evil, we must stand and do what conscience demands, as Gore should have.

"It's the action, not the fruit of the action, that's important. You have to do the right thing. It may not be in your power, may not be in your time, that there'll be any fruit. But that doesn't mean you stop doing the right thing. You may never know what results come from your action. But if you do nothing, there will be no result."
-- Mahatma Gandhi


 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
37. Thank you. You and Gandhi said it better than I am able. I think some use pragmatism or the
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:31 PM
Apr 2016

bastardization of such to justify inaction.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
42. And it would have made no difference. Check who had control of the House and the Senate.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:06 PM
Apr 2016

Bush would have been elected anyway.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
9. Yes, it will get worse.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:43 AM
Apr 2016

After Hillary Clinton disrespects the 1st and 4th amendments with respect to encryption and digital privacy via domestic surveillance, things will most definitely be worse.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
11. Buckle up.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

This is going to be a summer like no other in recent history. The Benghazi committee is releasing its report on July 18.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
16. Some of us Democrats still care about the bill of rights, indeed.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:51 AM
Apr 2016

You're on record as not caring though, so I understand there's not much progress to be made here. Indeed, you're for the regressive candidate in this regard.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
19. No, not a pious few. Many of us. Just not you. As you have made abundantly clear.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:01 AM
Apr 2016

But it's ok, my knowledge of what you believe in and don't believe in tells me everything I need to know about how to value your opinions in the future.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
21. oh great and wise dudebro, thank you for putting me
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:06 AM
Apr 2016

in my place by splaining to me what I value. Bye

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
43. Progressives care about the Constitution while conservatives care about greed.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:07 PM
Apr 2016

The Clinton Family has put a lot of emphasis on amassing wealth.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
13. It's not over. We will fight against the Big Money domination of our government that the
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:47 AM
Apr 2016

Clinton supporters embrace. Your Rich Fat Cats may push Clinton into the nomination but we will fight on against the corrupt culture.

dinkytron

(568 posts)
20. All the way to the convention! And then the courts. Oooh, the "discovery" is
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

going to be eye opening, I'm sure. We will fund Bernie's lawsuit(s). Calling it now.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
30. I agree it will get worse as the Ruling Class loots more and more of our resources.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:00 AM
Apr 2016

50,000,000 Americans living in poverty.

16,000,000 children living in poverty

16,000,000 children living in low income homes

over 2.5 million children homeless

1.5 million Americans incarcerated with millions more felons on the street unable to get work.

But to some none of that matters as long as we have a Clinton Aristocracy where their wealth grows and grows. $150,000,000 and climbing.

Mammon: The greedy pursuit of wealth. And at the expense of those struggling among us.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
26. No, it's not happening again. This time we won't allow the winner to get robbed...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:46 AM
Apr 2016

The one who is ahead in delegates and votes, that the one who will win.

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
44. Point to Bernie Sanders' challenge of the New York results...or any other State...
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:08 PM
Apr 2016

...otherwise, this is just more bluster.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»In 2000, they "neo-conned...