Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1485 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's a head slapper... (Original Post)
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
OP
but not surprising, corporations are just going to get stronger without some push back
hollysmom
Apr 2016
#2
You assume the majority of people know her stance on the issue.. and the your assertion is baseless
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#5
peace13
(11,076 posts)1. That's disappointing.
And disturbing all in the same moment.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)2. but not surprising, corporations are just going to get stronger without some push back
third way is the wrong way.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)3. Part of the larger TPP issue. nt
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)4. The problem with this method of attacking Clinton is that
there are too few people who think GMOs are a primary issue. Virtually every one of those who do are already sure they're not voting for Clinton.
It's not going to work.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)5. You assume the majority of people know her stance on the issue.. and the your assertion is baseless
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)6. Is it an attack to say she is in favor of GMO's?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)7. Celiac Disease is not linked to Roundup Ready GMOs...
What a pile of horseshit.
Frankly, I'm glad Hillary is in agreement with science, and not with the anti-GMO woo woos.
Sid
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)8. oh sid.. my O's beat your Jays yesterday.. woot woot...
Is that the same science that you use to look the other way on fracking and it's affect on climate change.
While the science is not definitive on the direct cause and affect.. there are a mountain of personal accounts..
?cb=1394472119
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)9. You're sticking with Celiac Disease is linked to Roundup ready GMOs?...nt
Sid
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)10. yes, there are mountains of anecdotal evidence my dear negative Sid
not cause and effect settle science...
From last nights win against the jays