Hinted it might be a woman. Maybe Chelsea.

I hope for her own sake, she stays away from the queen of Wall Street.

Healthcare....nope

War in Iraq....well, she helped get that done.

Talked Obama into an agressive stance in Libya....how nice.

Working to get the things done that Republicans already want is nothing to brag about.

Anyone can work with the Republicans by lying down.

If Warren were to join the ticket, I would just lose respect for her. It would not encourage me to forget about how nasty I think Clinton is.

Hillary has a great resume, but poor job performance.

Oh, and she's "fighting for us".....whatever the hell that means.

Negotiated cease fire in middle-east. Immigration reform. And more.

What's Sander's accomplished?

Don't get me wrong, Obama has done quite a lot considering the obstruction he's against.

But when not giving him a handicap for the obstruction, he hasn't done much. So it seems his method to get around the GOP is lacking.

good enough.

All this would do is get Warren out of the Senate and into a basically nothing job, which is, of course, a Third Way wet dream.

To name Warren as VP is kind of the pinnacle of cynical pandering. Disgusting.

So Dick Cheney bears little or no responsibility for Iraq?

Hillary would do.

NEVER have we had a president as lazy as W.

Cheney named himself VP and basically told Bush what to do. To compare Warren with Cheney is ridiculous.

If Warren was VP, you really thing she would influence Hillary? What a fucking joke. Warren would do funerals and state dinners and be out of Hillary's Third Way hair; Warren would be more effective as a Senator. Hillary and the Third Way people know that. They even went to the trouble of saying Warren is getting out of hand, in a WSJ opinion piece.

FFS.

Do you think Hillary will give up that control? I don't.

It would do nothing to get my vote. That they think it could, if that's what they're trying to do, only confirms my reasons for rejecting her. It actually kinda pisses me off. She has to actually change, not simply appear to, and it's too late to convince me she means her recent move to the left. Seven months isn't nearly enough time to do it. So... the pooch has already been screwed.

And using the Senator like that disgusts me too.

Possible no?

I could see Warren as Bernie's VP (although still bad to lose her as a Senator) - because I think they would really work together as a team. And I could see Warren as president. But as Hillary's little errand runner? Nope.

Besides, who knows what fixes are in, anyway.

And if this is a trial balloon, someone pop it real quick. Hillary is not moving left, and Hillary would only be using Warren to try and snag Bernie's supporters, with the huge plus of getting Warren out of Congress. Pandering, with a side of the usual self-interest.

But I can't see Hillary not being impeached. Convicted is another matter.

She would never choose Warren. Never.

I didn't think Warren was a good choice as VP for either Clinton or Sanders.

into a virtually powerless powerless position.

Attract Bernie's supporters to the fold and then put her in a cubbie hole where she can no longer be difficult.

A two for one deal.

You know, someone who can appeal to "soccer moms" and "values voters" by promising to get tough on drugs, like take the problem of rampant medical marijuana use seriously.

Or maybe she's angling for the AG slot, be relatively easier to work on her priority of putting sick people in prison for smoking weed that way.

The VP candidate will have to be acceptable to the Military Industrial Complex and Wall Street. Wesley Clark was groomed for this role as he was from the military industrial complex, but it is no longer 2008 and so it is hard to say if he is still part of the plan.

This is just the distraction du jour.

a two woman ticket would be awesome. Ted Cruz would pee in his pants and Trump would probably sputter something stupid...the GOP would lose its collective mind...

Plus, it's insurance. She'd be a very acceptable president

Then Code Brown came along.

Beat Martha Chokely Coakley, who ran a campaign that made Jeb!'s look like genius.

Is that MA voters and people across the country who are real Liberals are energized by her. No offense to Ted Kennedy but he was damaged goods and everyone here knows why. Elizabeth doesn't have that.

We really need Warren in the Senate .. more than ever if Clinton is elected.

Yeah, but only at the top

allow herself to be used.

Everyone should read 'A Fighting Chance'. She spells it out clearly that she is NOBODY'S PAWN.

Nice try, Podesta. No sale.

here's one way to find out, huh.

Third Way attacks on Social Security and a willingness to put more restrictions on abortion - just because Warren is a woman? And we all know that Hillary would just be using Warren to snag votes, and then park her in a little office somewhere, happy to have her out of the Senate.

Try thinking of this without gender involved. ISSUES. Words. Deeds. Gender is meaningless.

I'm not going to tell you what you should do in that eventuality, but I know what I'm going to do, and it's exactly the same thing I do every 4 years.

And who she has at #2 on the ticket probably won't influence it all that much (unless it's someone like DWS, but I don't see that happening) but certainly a pick like Liz Warren would make me happy.

if offered.

And if you don't think Bill Clinton is going to have his big red nose right in the middle of everything she does, I want some of what you're smoking.

Besides, I don't think either Clinton wants Warren anywhere near the Oval Office. She would totally overshadow Hillary, in terms of brains, personal magnetism, speaking skills that the contrast would be ugly for the plodding and uninspiring president. I think Bill would put the kibosh on Warren as VP, but I don't think Hillary would even consider her.

And Warren is way too smart to attract herself to what would almost surely be a train wreck like a Hillary Clinton presidency.

The only positive would be if Hillary gets elected and is subsequently impeached and removed from office, we'd get President Warren. Which of course is just another reason why the Clintons puppet masters would never approve of Warren.

Elizabeth Warren will be on the list, but Hillary Clinton will probably choose someone else since her Wall St donors would oppose Warren.

If she left her senate seat she could become a toothless and hamstrung VP that's not really supported by the President.

I think we need Warren to stay in the senate so she can keep fighting for us.

Warren would not be on the Clinton short list.

One that has real potential to hold Hillary accountable. Sen. Warren has much more power and influence as a high profile assertive senator.

If Senator Warren is as smart as I think she is- she'll turn it down.

Good God, now you're going to through her under the bus?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]

I think Hillary would only offer the spot to Senator Warren as way to keep her from being productive- in that position or in the Senate. The Vice President really only has two primary duties: to cast a vote in the event of a Senate deadlock and to preside over and certify the official vote count of the U.S. Electoral College.

I think as VP she would not be given opportunity to get things done as the Senator views many issues, among them Wall Street and Citizens United pretty much the same way as Senator Sanders does. And even if she were given opportunity or authority as VP to get something done- I think Hillary Clinton would resent Senator Warren for it. Hillary is a narcissist and will not tolerate someone going against her and I don't believe that Senator Warren is one to unquestioningly follow.

No, I stand by what I said. If Senator Warren is as smart as we think she is, she'll stay in the Senate where she can actually get something done.


on edit: the word is throw as in- throw under the bus, not through. And MY GAWD, no, I did not throw Elizabeth Warren under the bus.

VP's have never influenced my vote.

Sorry but their goals and ideas about pretty much everything (particularly the economy) are anti-thetical to one another ... Warren has not even endorsed Clinton

I don't think so

what she stands for.

Not in a million years

and then if Hillary is indicted, Warren becomes President.

It would be extremely stupid to pick someone as VP that people would rather have at the top of the ticket. All that would do for Hillary is show everyone where she is weak on policy.

by accepting second banana and selling out.

Even if it did, I still would not vote Hillary.

go after Wall Street the way she can as a Senator.

Great choice Hillary!

But the Clinton part, not so much.

I may actually vote for her in the general if picks a progressive running mate. If she picks some 3rd way asshole I won't.

if she ran with Clinton

can things be so bad that they need to light off the finale now?
what do they expect to gain?
wow.

I find it offensive.