Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 07:12 PM Apr 2016

One thing laid bare this primary: super delegates are superfluous. NIX THEM

Both sides have used arguments that boil down to the very simple fact that super delegates are either undemocratic or superfluous.

They serve no real value. The recent mantra is that they will honor the vote of the people, following the pledged delegate winner. Okay. In that case, there is no need to have 15% of the delegates allocated to them. In fact, there is no point in having them at all if they are nothing more than a pro forma rubber stamp.

Alternatively, they vote without regard to the pledged delegate winner, but on any other standard they choose. For example, following the popular vote of the entire primary, the popular vote of whatever state they are associated with, personal connection to the candidate, the candidate who helped raise campaign funds, the candidate with the highest favorability. Or they are there to thwart the voice of the people if the party leaders feel the people are out of line. Okay. In any of those cases, the super delegates are undemocratic.

Their impotence in most races and potential anti-democratic role in others boils down to a simple and concise point. Get the fuck rid of them.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One thing laid bare this primary: super delegates are superfluous. NIX THEM (Original Post) morningfog Apr 2016 OP
Absolutely. jwirr Apr 2016 #1
http://www.snopes.com/2016/02/17/party-people-superdelegates/ AuntPatsy Apr 2016 #2
The Super Delegates are, and are intended to be, a check on the primary voters kennetha Apr 2016 #3
Kick! (Them out!) morningfog Apr 2016 #4
I agree, No more super delegates. bigwillq Apr 2016 #5
I disagree Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #6

AuntPatsy

(9,904 posts)
2. http://www.snopes.com/2016/02/17/party-people-superdelegates/
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 07:21 PM
Apr 2016

A little history of how super delegates came to be courtesy of Snopes....very interesting..

http://www.snopes.com/2016/02/17/party-people-superdelegates/

kennetha

(3,666 posts)
3. The Super Delegates are, and are intended to be, a check on the primary voters
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 07:23 PM
Apr 2016

Primary voters tend to be aroused activists, sometimes with no sense of political reality. Especially where primaries are open, and allow people with marginal loyalty to the party, or marginal sense of political reality, they give the party check against the tides of aroused activists sweeping up the party apparatus and taking it down to defeat.

They have a real value unless you believe that the voters can never be fools.

The Republicans sure wish they had super delegates now as a way of stemming the Trump tide.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
5. I agree, No more super delegates.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 08:41 PM
Apr 2016

Should be pop vote, and pop vote only, even if the candidates I support never win an election again.

In addition, get rid of caucuses and closed primaries.

I want to have a say in every race that affects me, D AND R.

Demsrule86

(68,582 posts)
6. I disagree
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:08 PM
Apr 2016

We don't have the contested primaries...like the GOP and that is a good thing unless you are a Bernie supporter...he lost by every measure...and how amusing that super delegates are Bernies' only hope. He won't get their votes...as he lost by all measures.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»One thing laid bare this ...