The end is nigh.

What right-wing memes will be promoted when parity comes to DU?

...to such an obvious attack.

This is why you don't nominate a candidate who is under FBI investigation.

If she's ultimately indicted...you lose.

If she's not indicted...you still lose.

I'm just curious.

Wonder how Billy is taking this coming from one of his Cocktail Circuit.

I just wish that this clock didn't have its arms and numbers removed.

Here we go!

Bit surprised they're doing this so early. Many of those targeted Dems are superdelegates. Could this give them pause to reconsider who they support?

Yeah, probably not. Dems haven't been that strategically savvy since, well, DWS took over.

And he just has to use the video of the POTUS
saying that "she was careless". And he will ask:
Who wants a careless POTUs?

And Trump will not be alone in these attacks, others
will join in.

This is going to be a disastrous campaign imo.

because she is truly open for that attack.

And I doubt the party is ignorant of this.

Back to timeline, speaking off.. though this does not go into it.

I definitely think this is one of them. Both parties don't
care as long as the status quo is kept.

I believe also that the repug party will make other
choices than Trump or Cruz, because as long as they
have HRC to fight the party will be united.

but Trump will likely be the candidate, He will get within 100 PDs, and the Rs are not stupid... After WI it looked like more than that. So they could do that, blow the convention open, Now I am not so sure.

she took from the now very questionable NY primary, which itself may change when all the hundreds of thousands of voters purged from the rolls are allowed to vote. I'm certain that will happen, no? There's no doubt this happened, the just suspended the woman they claim was responsible for the 'mistake'. But the NY Post is reporting she is just a 'scapegoat'.

Why is it that every time she 'wins' see Mass, Az, Iowa, now NY there is so much election fraud?

It dosent matter if she is innocent or not. It will still be used to attack her relentlessly.

and you know it

likes to go around and leave stinky eggs.

So your statement is patently false.

You know, lying about another candidate isn't going to do that candidate any good. Bernie Sanders has defended Hillary time and time again when he COULD have taken the bait from the Corporate shills on the media, but I watched him get angry at them and tell them he was not going to attack her.

When I see comments like that from Hillary supporters, I know I cannot trust a word that comes from campaign because I can play the videos for you and prove your comment to be FALSE with no problem at all.

It's a good thing Bernie is a far better person than I am, because after doing everything he could NOT to atack her, David Brock is spreading his filty lies, yes, he admits it proudly, and I would be be doing exactly what YOU are falsely accusing him of.

But he's a far better person than I am, thankfully. And he has so much to work with too, she is so lucky Bernie is such a decent human being.

She otoh, has done nothing but attack him and his supporters. Brock today boasting about the 'fake trolls' he has had all over Social Media attacking Bernie supporters. Do you REALLY want to keep this up, because like I said, I am more than willing to post the FACTS that Bernie himself has not done. '

I defended the Clintons for years against Bush supporters, only to find out that the Bushes and Clintons are like 'family'. What a slap in the face that was.

She needs to worry about her legal issues, because Bernie may be 'sick and tired of hearing about it' but the Republicans are SALIVATING over them.

Every point spot on.

I didn't even have to go to reddit or FR to get it!!

This site wasn't founded for cheerleading.

then act like they're doing the forum a favor by "showing them what the opposition is doing"




it's the oldest fallacy on the internets.

...in case the point of my OP was a bit too complex.

I've got a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in.

You are aware this is an either-or situation now, no?

presuming to know more than members who've been here since the forum was founded

doubtful at this point? How is it 'wingnut' to post the words of the Republican Front Runner? I would say it is necessary to know what they will do, but then I'm a Bernie supporter BECAUSE I care about facts.

or not.

....call it Skinner, enough divisive talk and RW ammo.

would have far-reaching negative ramifications for the entire Democratic ticket.

many of us are concerned about down-ticket candidates;

Trump said what he said and it was commented on here, not the other way around.

If you are so clueless to believe that the republicans don't have far more ammunition against Hillary than what is posted here, you are beyond hope.

They don't need any help finding things with which to attack Her Majesty, Ms. Golden Sacks. Her actions and the content of her emails has given them a gold mine that has barely been tapped.

Unfortunately, Sen. Sanders was too nice a guy to get into that. The republicans will have no such generosity.

Oh and calling out when people make up shit while trying to read minds and motivations.

So with that in mind, you're just making up shit and you have no clue what I think. Hope it's not you day job.

Your post reflected that.

Derp

his talking points are just laying all over the landscape. He picks up the ones that seem useful to him currently. If you think we get through the fall without Monica, Whitewater, Benghazi, Goldman Sachs, Vince Foster, Libya, Syria, E-mails and so much more, you have a rude awakening in store. There are political cudgels laying all over this battlefield, Trump will pick various ones up and swing them over and over, just to remind folks that they exist.

Oh wait. No, I did see that coming.

But Bernie's not a democrat, so he can't be accused of being part of the party protecting H. Damn. What else?

How about because Bernie said ""We are sick of hearing about your emails"". Aha! Got him there!! Bernie is coddling H!! If Bernie set off on H one-tenth as much as Trump has, we could all say he's attacking her and not protecting her.

Or, how about we start a rumor that Bernie is paying Trump to attack H because Bernie is afraid of making H mad? Would that work? ???... Nah, Bernie is not afraid of H, everyone knows that. Forget that one too. Damn!!

I got nothing else. Looks like Trump is on his own here. He's so mean, telling the truths. Wait!!!!! .... I got it!!!

Trump's a troofer!!

Discussion of our opponents' strategies against us has always been permitted during the GE on DU. Hell, coming up with ways to counter those strategies is why DU was founded...not for the 'Rah Rah' utopia you seem to think it will become.

Wow, he's got all the language down.