Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:15 PM Apr 2016

My one factor primary predictor is 6 for 6. What does it say is in store for 4/26?

Last edited Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:36 PM - Edit history (5)

States already predicted will be folded into the model itself after next Tuesday for May contests, so some of the later states may change after next week.


Hypothesis: Simply by analyzing the percentage of a state's population that is black, I believe you can fairly accurately predict the "winner" of a state in upcoming primaries and caucuses. There will be misses, I am sure, but I'm bored, so let's see how this works out. I'll bump the thread and fill in actual results (With insightful commentary like, "Boy, that one was wrong!&quot as primaries go on...assuming people are interested in my validation or humiliation, as the case may be.

So let's begin with states that have already voted

Your key for numbers below:
State Rank for Black Pop. State % of Pop. that is Black

All numbers from 2010 Census

Bernie Wins
44 NH 1.22%
33 CO 4.28%
31 MN 4.57%
26 OK 7.96%
49 VT 0.87%
29 KS 6.15%
32 NE 4.50%
47 ME 1.03%
16 MI 14.24%
48 ID 0.95%
43 UT 1.27%

Avg Black Pop 4.28%
At +1 Standard Deviation 8.38%

Hillary Wins
40 IA 2.68%
23 NV 9.00%
5 SC 28.48%
6 AL 26.38%
12 AR 15.76%
3 GA 31.4%
25 MA 8.1%
10 TN 16.78%
18 TX 11.91%
9 VA 19.91%
2 LA 32.4%
1 MS 37.30%
11 FL 15.91%
14 IL 14.88%
19 MO 11.49%
7 NC 21.60%
17 OH 12.04%
35 AZ 4.16%

Avg Black Pop 17.79%
At -1 Standard Deviation 7.80%


Prediction Methodology: If a state's black population is less than Bernie's 1 St Dev number, I predict he wins. If it is more than Hillary's 1 St Dev number, I predict she wins.

So my straight up, no commentary predictions (Note: this isn't a prediction of margin of victory, just who comes out on top as the state's winner. I also do not include territories):

34 AK 4.27% Bernie Correct
38 HI 3.08% Bernie Correct
36 WA 3.74% Bernie Correct
30 WI 6.07% Bernie Correct
42 WY 1.29% Bernie Correct
13 NY 15.18% Hillary Correct
21 CT 10.34% Hillary Correct
8 DE 20.95% Hillary Correct
4 MD 30.1% Hillary Correct
20 PA 10.79% Hillary Correct
27 RI 7.5% Bernie Correct
22 IN 9.07% Hillary
37 WV 3.58% Bernie
24 KY 8.2% Hillary
41 OR 2.01% Bernie
28 CA 6.67% Bernie
50 MT 0.67% Bernie
15 NJ 14.46% Hillary
39 NM 2.97% Bernie
46 ND 1.08% Bernie
45 SD 1.14% Bernie
** DC 50.7% Hillary

Now there will be some misses here, because the two data sets overlap in the 2nd Standard Deviation (Mean+2*StDev vs Mean -2*StDev), so the question will become which states and in which direction. That said, misses should favor Hillary as her Standard Deviation is over twice as wide as Bernie's (Wider standard deviation means more variation in the numbers. In this case, wider Deviation means Clinton has been more successful among a wider variation in black population than Bernie).

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My one factor primary predictor is 6 for 6. What does it say is in store for 4/26? (Original Post) Godhumor Apr 2016 OP
Did you factor in Hispanics itsrobert Apr 2016 #1
The black demographic is a consistent factor--favors Clinton overwhelmingly Godhumor Apr 2016 #2
Your model is great but itsrobert makes a great point. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #3
This model was something of a self-bet. Can I use one 1 factor only to predict races Godhumor Apr 2016 #5
How strange considering the disastrous crime bill of 1994 lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #4
African Americans are informed enough to know that Bernie voted for the disastrous bill. pnwmom Apr 2016 #6
Bernie has ownership stake in that one. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #7
But in Bernie's mind it's all the evil oligarchs' fault! MoonRiver Apr 2016 #11
The only candidate running who voted for that bill is Bernie Sanders oberliner Apr 2016 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author MoonRiver Apr 2016 #10
Hey, didja know that Bernie marched with Martin?...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #22
K&R just for the work you obviously put into it. nt Buns_of_Fire Apr 2016 #9
Thanks. I do this kind of stuff when I get bored Godhumor Apr 2016 #12
7 for 7 n/t Godhumor Apr 2016 #13
8 for 8 n/t Godhumor Apr 2016 #14
Amazing! You're on fire. grossproffit Apr 2016 #15
9 for 9 n/t Godhumor Apr 2016 #16
10 for 10 n/t Godhumor Apr 2016 #17
And 11 for 11 Godhumor Apr 2016 #18
That is actually amazing. auntpurl Apr 2016 #20
To be honest, I'm surprised it has worked so well Godhumor Apr 2016 #21
WVA might break your streak. auntpurl Apr 2016 #23
Nicely done! Lucinda Apr 2016 #19
Remarkable. I love this kind of thing. yardwork Apr 2016 #24

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
1. Did you factor in Hispanics
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:19 PM
Apr 2016

I predict Hillary to win NM and California based on her huge Hispanic population support. See AZ, Texas, Florida, etc.

thanks

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
2. The black demographic is a consistent factor--favors Clinton overwhelmingly
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:22 PM
Apr 2016

So, I'm keeping this simply to black population for the model. However, there is a very good chance CA flips to Clinton when I recalibrate next week--especially if Sanders can't pull off Rhode Island.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
5. This model was something of a self-bet. Can I use one 1 factor only to predict races
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:45 PM
Apr 2016

To date, black population has a 72% correlation with Clinton's margin.

So, for my little bet, it is the best factor available.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
6. African Americans are informed enough to know that Bernie voted for the disastrous bill.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:52 PM
Apr 2016

So why should they hold it against Hillary and not him?

Bernie was more of a law and order guy back then. When the bill was going through Congress, he added a statement to the Congressional Record advocating for eliminating the disparity between sentencing for crack and cocaine -- by raising the penalties on cocaine.

Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #4)

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
12. Thanks. I do this kind of stuff when I get bored
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:00 PM
Apr 2016

I even modeled out the entire NFL season by team the last two years. That was a fun exercise and surpassingly accurate (Hit poll about 70% of outright winners by week).

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
18. And 11 for 11
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:37 PM
Apr 2016

So ends April. The model will be recalibrated for May to include results from the 11 predicted races so far.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
21. To be honest, I'm surprised it has worked so well
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:08 AM
Apr 2016

I thought the model was overestimating Bernie's chances in Rhode Island, but I was wrong. Sometimes the numbers are the numbers, no matter how much we would rather believe something different.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»My one factor primary pre...