2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA New Policy Disagreement Between Clinton and Sanders: Soda Taxes
This week, Mrs. Clinton became the first presidential candidate to explicitly endorse a tax on sugary drinks. At a Philadelphia event Wednesday, she said a proposal there to use a soda tax to fund universal prekindergarten was a good idea.
It starts early with working with families, working with kids, building up community resources, Mrs. Clinton said, according to a CNN report. Im very supportive of the mayors proposal to tax soda to get universal preschool for kids. I mean, we need universal preschool. And if thats a way to do it, thats how we should do it.
More at http://nyti.ms/214wg3c
What's next? Senator Sanders coming out against taxes on cigarettes?
merrily
(45,251 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)what are you going to do when soda tax revenue goes down? Shut down the schools? Send half the kids home? It needs to be something more lasting and substantial than that. Soda consumption is already going way down.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)We have no money for these programs... unless we can get it from the poorest people.
think
(11,641 posts)demigoddess
(6,641 posts)I can't believe people give such young children sodas filled with caffeine. It is like have 2 or 3 cups of coffee. I gave up soda because the caffeine was so strong. Taxing it might be a good idea.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)It certainly seems like ana idea worth trying.
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)we never gave a kid in the 'olden' days. Maybe that is why so many kids are labeled hyperactive these days.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Disagrrements on a soda tax are not the fire breathing rhetoric
of "She's not qualified" "They're all corrupt"
This is a nice safe disagreement.
Way to go Bernie.
Time to start nudging your reasonable supporters toward Hillary.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Here's what sin taxes have done to the tax burden in the states. Let's pick mine;
See that tiny little bump on the far right? Clinton and her donors occupy that realm - the 5.4% tax bracket. The takers.
Fuck sales taxes. Fuck sin taxes. Fuck regressive taxes. Go Bernie.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)helped decrease cigarette consumption, particularly among the very young and the poor. I think the savings would be more in reduced healthcare costs and less in the actual money collected. Why is this a bad thing?
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)in solving problems. This could work on a local level really well.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)On the preschool issue. How about we do it the old fashioned way and tax the millionaires and billionaires who can afford it? Why tax soda when there are so many other logical ways of achieving universal pre-k.