They either agree with her or don't care.

If you believe all people are equal under the law, that makes it hard to justify bombing them for their oil, banana plantations, mineral reserves, water, natural gas, etc.

Oil, well! Money trumps peace is Buy Partisan.

When they are informed about Hillary the majority of them switch to Bernie. Most are very surprised to hear Hillary's views on foreign affairs.

hand-picked advisers, while she was Secretary of State--and that Hillary supporter has no idea who Robert Kagan is.

Their eyes glaze over.

"Robert Kagan. You know, the guy who founded the neocon movement. He's the architect of the Iraq war and all of the war that we see now in the Middle East."

"Um, well. I just think it's time for a woman President and I like that she's tough. She seems really tough. Who is that Robert guy again?"

It's a wonder these types can even find their way back to the sorority house without assistance.

Love your post except for that bit.

Most of her supporters, male and female, young and old (mostly old though dur), are shamelessly (and seemingly even proudly) ignorant about these important details about her.

and they like it. They are aware and they agree with the neocon plan--or due to their blind cult-of-personality support of Hillary they dismiss it. These types would watch her declare war on Iran (or Michigan, for that matter!) and defend it all the way.

However, there is another breed of Hillary supporter that is blissfully unaware. They don't get it. They are vacuous (and like soooo in the dark, OMG) like sneering sorority girls--mean girls. I suppose I could have included "fraternity"as well; the male flip side of that same coin.

those Hillary supporters who agree with her hawkish foreign policy, though I personally disagree with their position. At least they are making an informed choice. I have no respect for those who support her simply because it is time for a woman president, who insist she is a progressive yet can't explain why, who say she "gets things done" but can't point to anything specific, who think she was a great SoS but can't cite what she did, or who think she will be able to work with the Republicans without explaining how she can do that without being one.

But, apathy is the other half. Just plain don't give a shit, i.e. don't give a shit about global justice and decency, even when they KNOW about the abuses and outrages.

...and during her rise to power, neocons were still framing the debate.

She has not led, but rather followed.

decisions wrt war and regime change. NO feminist pushes to cause that kind of suffering and tries to peddle it as 'strong foreign affairs experience". Those that say she is one obviously haven't read of her history causing victims around the world.

I don't want to ever hear how the democrat party is the "anti war" party now that a majority of my fellow dems have supported a known hawk.