Greatness!

The answer to the second depends on...

So she says dumb shit like this, attempting to hit a home run, but you know, who does this criticism connect with? She's so "square".

None.
Yes Trump should be attacked on this but coming from her it's a fucking joke.

and now she's beginning to think she really is Bernie.

She's also greedy and corrupt, so I'm not at all a supporter. But I can see that she's bright.

She just seems dull. So perhaps that has nothing to do with innate intelligence, but she doesn't have the polish that Bill always did (as much as I disliked him, I have to give him credit for that).

the bar exam there, presumably because it was easier to do so. Clever and cunning is my opinion. Not highly intelligent.

If they do, then there is the distinction.

Drumpf never does anything that doesnt help him and only him.

... from organizations that rate charities.

citation needed

12% administrative costs.

https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478

One of four top rated in the Peace and International Relations category
https://www.charitywatch.org/top-rated-charities

Trump would wipe the floor with her.

If she is our nominee (dog forbid) and Trump is the GOP candidate, I'm going into hiding until the election is over. He will kick her ass on a daily basis. She is such a freakin' hypocrite. She can't possibly win this argument against Trump.

And Hillary is stupid enough criticize somebody else's lavish lifestyle?

(I doubt the Clintons actually pay for their summer house in the Hamptons. They probably barter political favors for it.)

Don't we want them to use their money and energies for good?

1 - Given their resumes, books, etc., they would have had to work at it to not have multiple millions. Do you want to legislate a top income?

2 - Most people with their assets and income have multiple houses. It says something about their values that they don't.

3 - I bet they'd like a less expensive venue, but they have to have a "yuge" place to get any privacy and they have to allow for secret service contingents for both of them.

How can you possibly use a vacation home as a reason to write off someone. Do you know of no wealthy people whose activities you approve of????

It's astonishment at the absurdity of someone of her wealth trying to attack someone else for being wealthy and out of touch with average Americans.
It's ridiculous and foolish.

She was mocking him for flying into venues, insulting other candidates, and flying out without talking to people.

Smh.

Why do you think I posted it? And it was most certainly NOT just your spin on it. Anyone can read it for themselves.
Please report back to your superiors that she better get some better material because this is ridiculous.

Reading into shelters, dark money and all that

They are counting on voters being idiots and not realizing she flies in (not that I blame her) in private jets. Ok. So it is not Trump 1

Sheesh.

as soon as someone explains to them what a "country club lifestyle" is.

Net worth $110 cool millions vs what claimed $7 billion. Both live that lifestyle.

There's just no credibility to be hitting someone else on it. People are smart enough to know that...or at least some are.

I certainly don't feel sorry for him.

From a completely non-credible source. You think I'm defending him?
Jesus wept...

She could take her fee from just one speech, pay cash for a new Bentley, and not even notice the change in her checkbook or offshore accounts.

as middle class? Or maybe part of the working poor? She is delusional.

But she can probably buy one for half a speech.

A multi-MILLIONAIRE criticizing a multi-BILLIONAIRE. Sort of like Godzilla vs. Rodan (while the population of Tokyo just tries not to get stepped on by either of them).

Next time I talk to Robby, I'll mention to him that this might not be a productive avenue of attack.

Faint praise though

he lives like Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

But he's a big hit with Reagan Democrats.

just as easily as he shot down her calling him sexist.

I think that would be "yes".

The line about Donald Tump's kids benefitting from free college was a clue of exactly how little she thinks of people who are poor. The implication is that people just want their anger reinforced and validated RATHER than to be treated more fairly.
She doesn't seem to even try to show any kind of respect to people who are poor. I guess it's more difficult to exploit and devalue people as a means to callous self absorbed end that way.

is simply absurd and I wish to hell Bernie would loudly call her out on it. Who the hell cares if a millionaire's kids attend a tuition free public school? That's no reason at all to deny a tuition free education to non wealthy kids. And of course it's even more ridiculous because the possibility of a guy like Trump sending his kid to a public college is just about nil. Hillary sent her daughter to Stanford, one of the most exclusive and expensive private school in the country. Fresno State was never in the running.

HRC is optics blind, due to her monumental belief that the 'regular folks' are wandering idiots that can be herded towards perceptions that she shapes and then states

My take is that the primary is showing the split within DEM party as to the mindless masses that follow HRC and the mindful masses that follow Bernie...

Last primary cycle you had two corporatist nominees to choose from... this primary cycle is completely different

WaPo writes some terrible headlines.

for speaking to crooks behind closed doors. She has a hell of nerve criticizing Trump's lifestyle. They're pals. They run in the same hallowed circles. Who the hell dies she think she's kidding? Trump will have a field day with this.