That never gets old.

Clinton argued that there were superpredators who terrorized inner-city economically-depressed minority communities and who needed to be removed for those communities to flourish. There is an implication of race and economic status contained within that argument.

Sanders merely argued that there are people who need to be kept behind bars to protect society because they were not redeemable. There is no implication of race or economic status contained within.

The problem with Clinton's statement and the difference from Sanders statement is between being a classist racist and recognizing bad people exist. It's the difference between incarcerating the guy selling rocks on the corner for life on his third conviction and incarcerating John Wayne Gacy for life after his first.

And how do you know that?

and Clinton by her own words clearly was.

That's the difference. Their respective statements out Clinton as a racist classist and don't out Sanders as such.

several times. Until it passed.

someone else. Bernie was using his own words.

2) Racism. We were instructed to hammer home how Bernie supporters were all privileged white students that had no idea how the world worked. We had to tout Hillary's great record with "the blacks" (yes, that's the actual way it was phrased), and generally use racial identity politics to attack Sanders and bolster Hillary as the only unifying figure.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3rncq9/confession_of_hillary_shill_from/

with AND without assault weapon provisions….

And NOT voting for the crime bill at all?

"They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called ‘superpredators.’ No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

See they used to be just gangs of kids, but not anymore now they the kinds of kids called superpredators....kids.

was about incarcerating fewer people, noting that there are some exceptions for psychologically sick and violent people who can't be reclaimed. He wasn't calling groups of kids, superpredators, with the kind of coded panache that only a conservative could love.

However, we know, only Bernie gets the benefit of rationalizing his actions. If one reads Hillary's statement about the Iraq war, the same kind of leeway could be applied to it. It wasn't something she did without reservations and she said so.

but not a lot of room at the top.

But I guess that would be too much to ask of a Clinton supporter.

The same paragraph

he is still referring to the same class of people, in pretty much the same terms, and accepting the same prescription for them.

I guess I have nothing more to say other than you're amazingly tone deaf.

Hilary's comments on the bill completely lacked any sense of charity, while Sander's comments were full of charity.

One of them says 'jail the bastards and throw away the key', the other says 'if we lock them up and throw away the keys we are not only giving up on the people we lock up, but also on their families" ... which one sounds more 'charitable' to you?

You had entire neighborhoods practically held hostage by gang turf wars where shootings were common place. Gang leaders are predators, because they often issue death threats against young kids who won't join the gang. There are a lot of things that people do not know about gangs. These are not social clubs that Hillary Clinton was preying on because she's a racist, these are very dangerous groups of people.

so keep it to yourself.

I think I'm a better judge of what I need than you are.

And the other is talking about criminals in general

That's the difference