Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:29 PM Apr 2016

huge facebook groups for Bernie are being banned via bogus alerts

Four communities with more than 120,000 members total have been banned in quick succession today. Groups for Bernie. Here's the message on facebook, from the Bernie Sanders Social Network group:


Please share this to any Bernie groups you're in. The "online activist" group Hillary's super PAC hired(basically paid trolls) are striking tonight. By spamming the "report post to Facebook" feature on posts in Bernie groups, they've successfully shut down 3 of the largest Bernie groups within the past 20 minutes. Bernie Believers, Bernie Activists, and Bernie Sanders is my Hero had over 120,000 group members.
Don't panic! This should only be temporary until Facebook reviews the situation. Forgetting for a moment that this is easily one of the slimiest tactics I've ever seen in politics, you can still go to reddit to keep current on what's going on in the campaign. They hit us the night before tomorrow's primaries for a reason. Stay organized and stay informed.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/

135 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
huge facebook groups for Bernie are being banned via bogus alerts (Original Post) grasswire Apr 2016 OP
. libodem Apr 2016 #1
Proof at this Facebook page post: CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #25
Wow...just....wow JackInGreen Apr 2016 #29
They're Here! Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #2
We know they are here. Not many, it doesn't take many. morningfog Apr 2016 #13
hahahahahah! nolawarlock Apr 2016 #35
Let's hope you are right. KPN Apr 2016 #56
that's fucked up gopiscrap Apr 2016 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #4
Make no mistake, paid by the Clinton Campaign. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #21
interesting. one_voice Apr 2016 #26
There are probably enough individual comments to get the group flagged. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #5
Enjoy the $.05 for this post. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #12
interesting. one_voice Apr 2016 #27
If it's anything like I've seen from Facebook Bernie supporters on super delegate pages ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #36
OMG. Down the rabbit hole. You are delirious with your no-wage internship. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #39
Wow! nolawarlock Apr 2016 #44
I don't really care whether you are or not. There are so many that's the story in and of itself. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #46
Whether it's blind greed or blind devotion ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #49
WOW! You guys got BERNED by his Vatican invitation. LOL! Keep trying to spin that. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #61
That has nothing to do with my upset over the Vatican visit. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #66
If you're not a troll you're delusional. "Sleazy way?" He was INVITED. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #69
My paycheck? LOL nolawarlock Apr 2016 #74
Noting your little "rape gif." Kurovski Apr 2016 #124
Except I don't see that in anyone's sig file. nt nolawarlock Apr 2016 #128
how can they verify that? grasswire Apr 2016 #59
Quite easily actually. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #77
Are you Sean Hannity or Rush greiner3 Apr 2016 #132
Not quite. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #133
LOL, it was some kind of server glitch. ucrdem Apr 2016 #40
It was not a server glitch! CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #73
Nope. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #82
So Hillary cast a spell on FB and then uncast it? ucrdem Apr 2016 #88
The Hillary supporters responsible admitted it and posted the alerts they made Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #89
Yes I saw the #BernieProof. ucrdem Apr 2016 #95
The actual post from the actual guy who did it? Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #96
Saw it but unless he controls FB it's bogus. Sometimes a glitch is just a glitch. ucrdem Apr 2016 #106
He posted the alert response he received and admitted it Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #119
Hillary's private server? DebDoo Apr 2016 #92
All the world's a Hillary server ucrdem Apr 2016 #97
Faith-based politics are kind of funny. ucrdem Apr 2016 #6
That was so on point. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #75
Kick Luminous Animal Apr 2016 #7
We are being "corrected" bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #8
Now, I wonder who would do something like that nichomachus Apr 2016 #9
I Highly Doubt This Is Team Clinton. Too Easy, People. And She's Leading. writes3000 Apr 2016 #10
It doesn't matter that she's leading. morningfog Apr 2016 #17
Have you noticed the super low post count "I'll never vote for Clinton" posts in here? writes3000 Apr 2016 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #24
Yep, exactly. It's shocking how easy it is to ratfuck the bernie folks and pin it on Clinton. ContinentalOp Apr 2016 #32
Then why put $1M toward trolls in the first place? snowy owl Apr 2016 #31
well done reddread Apr 2016 #34
There is no low too low for Clinton. Ugly stuff. Can't wait to vote for Bernie! Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #11
Shame you won't get the chance. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #45
I have June in CA then write-in in November if she steals the primary. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #47
Thank you for not being a Hillary supporter. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #50
Glad to be your Ambien. Sunrise is scheduled for November 9. :D Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #58
Looking forward to that day. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #60
I can't stand your dribbles - so 840high Apr 2016 #62
Fun, thanks! JaneyVee Apr 2016 #70
I have never seen the kind of political abuse that I've seen from Sanders supporters this year... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #51
5 weeks, 6 hides here. Gosh such an expert riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #80
LOL! nolawarlock Apr 2016 #85
As far as never voting for Clinton ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #53
Welcome to DU. Pleasure 840high Apr 2016 #54
Or bogus propaganda. They probably just banned them period after the first alert silvershadow Apr 2016 #14
Perhaps Facebook finally wised up is starting to clean the misogyny off of its site Tarc Apr 2016 #15
Disliking Hillary isn't misogyny. hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #20
It's just a Hello from Team Brock Hydra Apr 2016 #22
Facebook is a publicly held company. Oligarchy. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #48
You're a donkey. 840high Apr 2016 #55
You sir, are an idiot JesterCS Apr 2016 #127
Poor l'il poppet Tarc Apr 2016 #131
#MillionDollarTrolls make it trend! jillan Apr 2016 #16
I'll join those groups when they are up and lend support. Unicorn Apr 2016 #18
The Election Justice group--the one speaking about the clusterfuck that was winter is coming Apr 2016 #23
Night of the long knives. Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #28
Surely not, Grasswire! Hillary never slimes. Right loyalists? snowy owl Apr 2016 #30
Acturally HRC Folks are culprits Here's the proof jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #37
Facebook barely ever removes anything. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #42
Gaslighting Bernie on an essay written 49 yrs ago jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #78
Lawyers are paid to win. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #79
She chose to defend a rapist of a 12yr old girl jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #86
Do we know she didn't think he was innocent? nt nolawarlock Apr 2016 #87
Listen to the tape and decide for yourself jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #93
I will try to listen tomorrow. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #94
Every defendant is entitled to a defense attorney in a criminal case. lovemydog Apr 2016 #99
bill clinton has been accused of rape by one of the several women he had sex with questionseverything Apr 2016 #120
Pure slime. 840high Apr 2016 #57
BOOM, there it is. grasswire Apr 2016 #63
Yup. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #84
To Make matters worse jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #125
Disgusting! bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #38
Hillary might want to be careful with this Marrah_G Apr 2016 #41
"Disqualify, Discredit...." ( i forget the third one) "disgust", maybe? Because that's what her AzDar Apr 2016 #43
disrupt? grasswire Apr 2016 #64
Both are fitting... AzDar Apr 2016 #83
And she expects these people to vote for her? mindwalker_i Apr 2016 #52
What utter bullshit. NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #65
you are aware that she just invested a million bucks for trolls? nt grasswire Apr 2016 #67
inb4 'coincidence' Lancero Apr 2016 #68
Well, "a million bucks for trolls" ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #76
the logical conclusion would be ratfucking grasswire Apr 2016 #98
It doesn't matter what one is "capable of". NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #101
okay, I'll play grasswire Apr 2016 #102
They might not be Bernie supporters. NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #104
This is just their latest lie to try to get victim status. It's not working, people. nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #90
It's also the last night ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #91
Her super PAC spent a million dollars on trolls and she hasn't DebDoo Apr 2016 #100
"So even if these aren't paid trolls ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #103
She knows her super PAC paid out a million dollars for online trolling. By not denouncing that she DebDoo Apr 2016 #108
sometime i think everyone is against bernie, except the many good people MariaThinks Apr 2016 #71
**shifty eyes** Matt_R Apr 2016 #135
We will still stand together jpmonk91 Apr 2016 #72
My message to HRC for the blackout jpmonk91 Apr 2016 #81
Seems sort of unlikely .... Onlooker Apr 2016 #105
The situation is VERY real azurnoir Apr 2016 #107
It may be happening ... Onlooker Apr 2016 #109
well here is a post from my previous link azurnoir Apr 2016 #110
Sorry, that won't work. We've already seen Hill fans in action. senz Apr 2016 #111
Fool you once ... Onlooker Apr 2016 #112
No one's accusing Facebook of doing anything. Facebook is innocent in this. senz Apr 2016 #114
FaceBook simply followed it's own policy azurnoir Apr 2016 #115
Yup Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #113
Yes, we have. senz Apr 2016 #116
And they continue to deny it every day. Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #117
It's incomprehensible. senz Apr 2016 #118
It seems to me, completely comprehensible. nolabels Apr 2016 #122
Good explanation, nolabels. Also this -- senz Apr 2016 #129
I doubt this is Brock or Clinton nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #121
Here's a better image that I found on Reddit dreamnightwind Apr 2016 #123
they're bragging about it (sister DU thread) MisterP Apr 2016 #126
I didn't understand this meme before now Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #130
The only way she can win is by cheating A Little Weird Apr 2016 #134

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
35. hahahahahah!
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:25 AM
Apr 2016

I don't know what hangs over this election season, but it was strong enough to punch a hole into this world, and take our civility with it!

Response to grasswire (Original post)

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
5. There are probably enough individual comments to get the group flagged.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:32 PM
Apr 2016

Some individuals post some terrible things. Pile up the alerts and it looks bad.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
36. If it's anything like I've seen from Facebook Bernie supporters on super delegate pages ...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:27 AM
Apr 2016

... I can understand how those groups probably got alerted. I've seen how horrific these Facebook warriors can be when separated. Put them all in one group and they're probably talking violent revolution or something.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
44. Wow!
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

Ever since million dollar trolls became a story, suddenly everybody is one.

Where's my cash, Hillary? Don't be throwin' me no shade. I just wanna get paid!

LOL

I am not a paid troll and the admins can easily verify that.

 

Crabby Abbey

(66 posts)
46. I don't really care whether you are or not. There are so many that's the story in and of itself.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:37 AM
Apr 2016

Be proud your candidate needs that kind of paid support. There's not much organic out there for corporate shills.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
49. Whether it's blind greed or blind devotion ...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:43 AM
Apr 2016

Neither impresses me. Bernie claims Hillary is on the take by greedy corporations. It didn't stop him from trying to use the Vatican to inspire a little old-fashioned religious devotion for his cause. Whether people are promoting Hillary because they were offered money or whether they're promoting Bernie because they have blindly accepted his vision to the point where they do not deviate from his views by a millimeter, neither impresses me. Frankly, I'm still amazed at how pro-gun all these super leftist Bernie supporters have become. Can't they just say, "hey, I agree with nine out of ten of this guy's policies?" No. They have to find some way to force their positions into agreement with his entire platform. That scares me as much as any religious cult.

 

Crabby Abbey

(66 posts)
61. WOW! You guys got BERNED by his Vatican invitation. LOL! Keep trying to spin that.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:56 AM
Apr 2016

Pope Frances would never invite Hillary. Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! So make it a negative. Again, people who are paying attention know this Pope wants economic morality. Only one person running making that the priority.

Go Birdie Sanders! Even nature knows he's for all of us.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
66. That has nothing to do with my upset over the Vatican visit.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

In fact, not a single other Hillary supporter spoke of my particular issues with that visit, which was why I finally joined this site after years of lurking in the first place. While I do think that invite was orchestrated in a sleazy way, who invited who was far less of an issue than the hypocrisy of claiming that our government is controlled by wealthy and powerful corporations only to attempt (and I mean attempt) to curry favor with one of the wealthiest and most powerful institutions on earth. Oh, and they're a foreign nation to boot. And I also had a major issue with the Vatican participating in this, even though I ultimately think the Pope himself probably wanted to run far away from this and it looks like he was manipulated every step of the way.

If either Sorondo or the Pope (the latter whom, incidentally, did not invite Sanders) invited Hillary, I would have been equally irritated. In fact, if it had been Hillary and not Bernie, I would have actually switched from Hillary to Bernie over it.

But if you want to lump me in with whoever, feel free. I've been called a sock and a troll so many times this past few weeks, that I'm used to it.

 

Crabby Abbey

(66 posts)
69. If you're not a troll you're delusional. "Sleazy way?" He was INVITED.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:04 AM
Apr 2016

Disgusting. Go get your paycheck.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
74. My paycheck? LOL
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:12 AM
Apr 2016

It was sleazy. Sanders had Sachs pitch this to Sorondo, end-game around Archer (who was actually furious enough to speak about it—yeah, she was on the invitation but she was clearly not consulted in any way that ended with approval). Then, when it was clear that the Pope was trying to escape this sideshow with his "querido hermano" letter to Sorondo (which Bernie supporters claimed on here was the Pope calling Bernie "brother" and only one Sanders supporter corrected that OP—only one) expressing regret for missing the conference, Sornondo cooked up a last minute handshake the night before by which Bernie would have the lurk about the lobby of the hotel (which Bernie supporters here claimed was the Pope's private residence that Bernie was invited by the Pope to when it was actually a residence that most of the conference attendees stay at and the Pope lives at in order to appear more humble), so that he could have a water cooler conversation for about five minutes.

The whole thing was disgusting. It sets a terrible precedent. I don't want our presidential candidates looking for tacit endorsements from the Vatican anymore than I want them currying favor from Liberty University or, worse, Bob Jones University (thank heavens they jumped into the shark—you never hear about them anymore). And too many Bernie supporters here reveled into the potential boost in Catholic votes to believe any claims that this was not sought out for expressly that purpose. What happens when we set that precedent and then the Church takes a turn we don't like but now we're stuck seeking the endorsement of someone who is probably even more anti-gay and anti-woman than this Pope (who is both)?

And worse, beyond the minuscule timeline of Bernie Sanders or even the broader timeline of the next few decades of American elections, I don't want a 2,000 year old institution that gave us the Crusades, Witch Burnings, and the Inquisition taking an active role in manipulating our elections. I'd rather have Goldman Sachs, and that's really saying something because I really don't think corporations should be manipulating government either.

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
124. Noting your little "rape gif."
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:35 PM
Apr 2016

Isn't it Bill Clinton who is an actual predator of women? The evidence points to "yes"

Such a foolish thing to bring up, considering.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
77. Quite easily actually.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:24 AM
Apr 2016

They can very easily know from the information I submitted for my account that I am very much a real person and not representative of anyone else. My email address links to my website on which I couldn't be more public about who I am. Heck, it wouldn't be hard to deduce for people even not having my email address.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
133. Not quite.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:18 PM
Apr 2016

I have a few fans, but I'm hardly an a-lister. One might even say I'm on a letter-list somewhere down in the Russian alphabet, I'm so second rate, but the fact is, there's people who know me and it wouldn't be hard to figure out I'm not a paid shill by anyone. But, by all means, keep throwing it out there.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
40. LOL, it was some kind of server glitch.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:30 AM
Apr 2016

Photobucket was acting up too. Now it's all better. Like the power on a rainy day. But count on team B to come up with an anti-Hillary conspiracy theory.


CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
73. It was not a server glitch!
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:11 AM
Apr 2016

A sever glitch that affected four of Bernie's most popular FB sites?

I just came from over there and people took screen shots of Hillary supporters saying that they deliberately alerted the page--claiming to FB that posts on the Bernie sites were threatening or violent.

Other Hillary supporters were cheerleading him on and they were marveling at what they had done. I took screenshots as well.

What a bunch of weasels.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
82. Nope.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:40 AM
Apr 2016

It was David Brock's Puppet Brigade at work.

Groups on Facebook aren't taken offline by rainstorms.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
89. The Hillary supporters responsible admitted it and posted the alerts they made
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:31 AM
Apr 2016

You would be best served stepping back from this and not trying to double down on something with photographic proof.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
96. The actual post from the actual guy who did it?
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:53 AM
Apr 2016

That explains your support for Hillary. Facts be damned!

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
119. He posted the alert response he received and admitted it
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 05:04 AM
Apr 2016

Either you are trolling (effectively) or you have a blind spot when it comes to actual, proven, tangible facts. Either choice is very sad.

writes3000

(4,734 posts)
10. I Highly Doubt This Is Team Clinton. Too Easy, People. And She's Leading.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:38 PM
Apr 2016

It's likely someone who wants to disrupt Clinton and the Dems.

writes3000

(4,734 posts)
19. Have you noticed the super low post count "I'll never vote for Clinton" posts in here?
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:50 PM
Apr 2016

What a coincidence! Republican disruptive tactics.

Response to writes3000 (Reply #19)

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
32. Yep, exactly. It's shocking how easy it is to ratfuck the bernie folks and pin it on Clinton.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:23 AM
Apr 2016

When you have a group of people who want to believe so badly that somebody on their side is an evil crook they're incredibly easy to manipulate.

 

Crabby Abbey

(66 posts)
11. There is no low too low for Clinton. Ugly stuff. Can't wait to vote for Bernie!
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:42 PM
Apr 2016

Will never vote for Clinton. She is too corrupt.

 

Crabby Abbey

(66 posts)
47. I have June in CA then write-in in November if she steals the primary.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:41 AM
Apr 2016

No worries. Never voting for Clinton. Thanks for helping cinch that for me. The more horrible Hillary trolls the more obvious it is. Republicans are better suited for this kind of campaigning. They are dumb. Democrats see it for what it is. And it will not help her in the general.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
51. I have never seen the kind of political abuse that I've seen from Sanders supporters this year...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:45 AM
Apr 2016

... so that you think they have some sort of moral high ground amazes me. Not only how I've seen Hillary supporters attacked, silenced, and alert-stalked here by virtue of a jury system that favors a site that's 80% Bernie supporters, but also the absolute viciousness I've seen on Facebook. I am quite sure if any of these groups were taken down by alerts, they were well deserved alerts, unlike the ones you see on this site.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
85. LOL!
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:49 AM
Apr 2016

If this site actually had admins that paid attention to it, you could email them and they'd be able to tell you that I am neither a sock nor a paid troll.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
20. Disliking Hillary isn't misogyny.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:52 PM
Apr 2016

Besides, the really vile pages (where you can see actual misogyny) hosted by republicans look to still be up.

Your assumptions are a very poor fit for reality.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
22. It's just a Hello from Team Brock
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

Ironic coming from the ultimate sexist, but since he knows it so well...

JesterCS

(1,827 posts)
127. You sir, are an idiot
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:54 PM
Apr 2016

I'm in several Bernie groups, and they re some of the nicest people. Sure you get your immature trolls everywhere, but relegating a whole group of people as misogynistic is the height of stupidity.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
131. Poor l'il poppet
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:03 PM
Apr 2016

Turns out that Facebook has some server errors that broke many FB Groups, not just Sanders fanboy ones.

Another bubble popped!

 

Unicorn

(424 posts)
18. I'll join those groups when they are up and lend support.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:47 PM
Apr 2016

Book marking.

I believe you need to look no further than Correct the Record(lie to cover it up) Hillary paid trolls to find the real people behind the Bernie Bros.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
23. The Election Justice group--the one speaking about the clusterfuck that was
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:14 AM
Apr 2016

the NY primary--got shut down for a while a few days ago.

jimmy_crack_corn

(79 posts)
33. Acturally HRC Folks are culprits Here's the proof
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:23 AM
Apr 2016

I guess the individual was proud, bottom line is I just became Bernie or Bust ! Integrity and shady tactics is not for me.. it is a twitter image

Response to jimmy_crack_corn (Reply #33)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
42. Facebook barely ever removes anything.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:31 AM
Apr 2016

Unlike this site and it's lovely jury system, I have seen some of the worst things on Facebook alerted with not even a finger lifted to remove it. I've seen hundreds and hundreds of people report the same abusive item and get no response. If Facebook actually banned a page for a credible threat of violence, I would be willing to bet there was one. I'd love to see the specific posts that were alerted. More importantly, I'd love to see how people here would perform the mental calisthenics necessary to justify those posts.

jimmy_crack_corn

(79 posts)
78. Gaslighting Bernie on an essay written 49 yrs ago
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:29 AM
Apr 2016

The concern then is on Hillary voluntarily defending a Rapist. Hillary in the 1975 and a sexual abuse case where Hillary took the rape victim "through Hell"

“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said.

Hillary said the victim was "emotionally unstable,with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing".

According to the daily beast article, the victim said "if she saw Clinton today, she would call her out for what she sees as the hypocrisy of Clinton’s current campaign to fight for women’s rights compared to her actions regarding this rape case so long ago."

By the way Hillary lied about it in 2014 when she said "“But at least in our system you have an obligation, and once I was appointed I fulfilled that obligation,” she wasn't actually a defense lawyer but was actually asked if she would represent the rapist as a favor to him, so she had a choice !!!

Now on the tape, in her own voice she was actually asked if she would represent the rapist as a favor to him, so she had a choice !!!

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html
http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-speaks-about-defense-of-child-rapist/


jimmy_crack_corn

(79 posts)
86. She chose to defend a rapist of a 12yr old girl
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:54 AM
Apr 2016

Now on the tape, in her own voice she was actually asked if she would represent the rapist as a favor to him, so she had a choice !!!

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
94. I will try to listen tomorrow.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:50 AM
Apr 2016

I don't imagine I'm going to see much other than a lawyer doing her job but I'll certainly have a listen.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
120. bill clinton has been accused of rape by one of the several women he had sex with
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:09 PM
Apr 2016

which seems way worse than bernie writing an essay

here in downstate illinois all a person hears at the local breakfast places is

monica,cigars, carlos danger (there is more but i don't want a hide)

bernie won my county by 70-30

illinois has a repub gov and senator, it is no longer a guaranteed blue state

the poster you responded to having that gif in his sig line is so disgusting i will have to leave du if there is any chance of me being able to vote dem in nov if she is the candidate

sad what the hc campaign has done to the democratic party

<shrugs>

jimmy_crack_corn

(79 posts)
125. To Make matters worse
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:46 PM
Apr 2016

The individual posted Child porn on the site and was proud of it
pic.twitter.com/GPRGKEbroG

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
41. Hillary might want to be careful with this
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:30 AM
Apr 2016

I have a feeling this might piss off people a bit more savvy then her army of alerters.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
43. "Disqualify, Discredit...." ( i forget the third one) "disgust", maybe? Because that's what her
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:33 AM
Apr 2016

campaign is doing...

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
52. And she expects these people to vote for her?
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:45 AM
Apr 2016

I think she's just made her election in the general even less likely. At the very least, she's given Trump a whole lot more ammo against her. Any time there is something either for or against Hillary, Trump (or whoever the loser is) will be able to ask how much she paid for it.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
65. What utter bullshit.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:00 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary is way ahead in votes and delegates, and will be even further ahead after tomorrow.

So her campaign decides that NOW is the time to "bogus alert" Bernie's FB pages.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.




NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
76. Well, "a million bucks for trolls" ...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:20 AM
Apr 2016

... is your take on it.

But what would be gained by alerting on Bernie FB pages? Will it change the outcome of tomorrow's races?

The "alert" I saw had to do with threats of violence. The logical conclusion would be that facing tomorrow's defeat, a few Bernie supporters got a bit too agitated and said things they shouldn't have.

Have you seen the comments left on the FB pages of John Lewis, Gabby Giffords, Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, etc., by Bernie supporters? It's not like they aren't already known for getting a bit hot-under-the-collar when they feel like it.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
98. the logical conclusion would be ratfucking
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:58 AM
Apr 2016

Do you honestly believe that people who follow Bernie are capable of violence? Pfffft.

Lunacy.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
101. It doesn't matter what one is "capable of".
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:05 AM
Apr 2016

FB shuts down pages based on threats of violence, suggesting it, or encouraging it.

They are not the least bit interested in assessing whether someone "meant it", or was "capable of it" - that's not their job.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
102. okay, I'll play
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:08 AM
Apr 2016

I don't believe that genuine Bernie followers are capable of threatening violence, suggesting it, or encouraging it.

I do believe that there are plenty of ratfuckers out there on facebook. I see them every day. They usually seem to espouse Trump.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
104. They might not be Bernie supporters.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:16 AM
Apr 2016

But that doesn't mean they're HRC people either - so why jump to one conclusion and not the other?

There's precedent here. The comments BS supporters left on the FB pages of people who endorsed HRC are well known, and have been documented and written about. There are also the threatening letters, emails and phone calls to super-delegates from BS supporters.

So it's not a stretch to think they'd post things on Bernie's FB pages that were threatening.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
91. It's also the last night ...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:43 AM
Apr 2016

... that people can get in their anti-HRC digs before tomorrow's primaries - which many here fear will be the last night they can do so before Skinner brings the hammer down on people bashing the apparent nominee.

He won't - but they don't know that for sure. So it's throw-everything-at-the-wall night before it's too late.

But I have to say this "Hillary shut down Bernie's FB pages" story is an absolute hoot! Who knew that desperation could be THIS entertaining!

DebDoo

(319 posts)
100. Her super PAC spent a million dollars on trolls and she hasn't
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:02 AM
Apr 2016

Publicly stated that she's against it. So even if these aren't paid for trolls, she's condoned their behavior.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
103. "So even if these aren't paid trolls ...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:11 AM
Apr 2016
... she's condoned their behavior."

What kind of ridiculous logic is THAT? How can she be condoning the behaviour of people she doesn't even KNOW about?

Given all of the publicity about what Bernie supporters have posted on the FB pages of John Lewis, Gaby Giffords, Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, etc., without a peep out of Bernie, I guess we can just assume he condoned all of that - right?

DebDoo

(319 posts)
108. She knows her super PAC paid out a million dollars for online trolling. By not denouncing that she
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:35 AM
Apr 2016

Gives her tacit approval

MariaThinks

(2,495 posts)
71. sometime i think everyone is against bernie, except the many good people
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

why is the system out to get Bernie? he who would singlehandedly fix capitalism, ensure that guns hurt no one, and let his democratic self out in full glory.

even google developers are probably writing code to skew election results and polls. I think when a poll result is displayed, Bernie and Hillary results are swapped so Bernie always seems to be behind.

while I'm at it. I don't understand why Hillary should win the nomination just because she has more declared delegates and superdelegates. when does having more votes give her the right to take the nomination? Especially if, by the current changing in support, if the nomination was delayed for another year, Bernie would win. Why is Hillary so corrupt that she has worked the system so that the nominee has to be selected this year.

Hillary has all the power to corrupt the system by having votes counted, nominations this year, and 35 years as a lawyer, first lady, best selling author, senator, secretary of state. what does she know. And given the chance, couldn't all of us do what she's done? Bernie could. And Hillary didn't let him do any of those things. I would vote for Bernie but Hillary won't let me.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
105. Seems sort of unlikely ....
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:25 AM
Apr 2016

... Why would legitimate Hillary supporters antagonize Bernie supporters in this way at this time? Frankly, it would make more sense for Bernie supporters to do that to Hillary, since it's an act of desperation, and Hillary is hardly desperate. My guess is these acts are being committed by those trying to sow discord among Democrats. Hopefully not any Bernie supporters will fall for it. But, if there's proof that it's being done by the Hillary super PAC, by all means share it.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
109. It may be happening ...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:41 AM
Apr 2016

... but again it seems to m that the only people at this point who are interested in sowing discord between Bernie and Hillary supporters are the Republicans. Hillary is clearly winning the primary race, so has no motive for such shenanigans at this point. If this happened a few weeks ago, it might make a little more sense, but it doesn't make any sense right now.

By the way, I don't really use Facebook much, but it appears that Viva Bernie is up and running, and the article it links to simply presumes it's Hillary supporters doing this. But, again, I think that's unlikely (unless it's a group of obnoxious teens).

Also, there's at least one twitter claiming that this was a Facebook problem, not an attack on Sanders (about halfway down, a Twitter from Aidan King, who apparently is a very, very active in the Sanders campaign):

http://heavy.com/news/2016/04/bernie-sanders-facebook-groups-removed-banned-deleted-why-hillary-clinton-attack-censorship-which/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/aidan-king-81741459

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
110. well here is a post from my previous link
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:46 AM
Apr 2016

‪#?BERNIEBLACKOUT‬ for updates follow us at Viva Bernie 2016
Please share this to any Bernie groups you're in. The "online activist" group Hillary's super PAC hired(basically paid trolls) are striking tonight. By spamming the "report post to Facebook" feature on posts in Bernie groups, they've successfully shut down 3 of the largest Bernie groups within the past 20 minutes. Bernie Believers, Bernie Activists, and Bernie Sanders is my Hero had over 120,000 group members.
Don't panic! This should only be temporary until Facebook reviews the situation. Forgetting for a moment that this is easily one of the slimiest tactics I've ever seen in politics. They hit us the night before tomorrow's primaries for a reason. Stay organized and stay informed.
Piss off a SuperPAC troll and donate to: Bernie.To/Donate
Help other Bernie Fans connect to the Bernie Groups you like, trust and follow by adding links or tagging to them in the comments.
Viva Bernie 2016 will keep you up to date on the developments.
Typical dirty campaign tactics by the Clinton Army.
‪#?NeverShillary‬ ‪#?HillNo‬ ‪#?WeWontForget‬ ‪#?DEMTownhall‬ ‪#?ThingsBernieHates‬ ‪#?VivaBernie‬ ‪#?FeelTheBern‬
UPDATE
8 Pages that went down were, some are back up.
Bernie Sanders Activists
Bernie Believers
Bernie Sanders Is My Hero
Bernie or Bust
Bernie Sanders for President
Bernie Sanders – Ideas Welcome
Bernie Sanders Revolutionaries
Bay Area for Bernie

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
113. Yup
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:58 AM
Apr 2016

We've seen them gloat on other sites about stalking Bernie supporters here to get them put on time out.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
116. Yes, we have.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:10 AM
Apr 2016

We've seen plenty of sneaky, malicious, destructive actions followed by gloating.

How can anyone be proud to be like that? In fact, how can anyone stand to be like that? It's incomprehensible. Yet we see it every day.



nolabels

(13,133 posts)
122. It seems to me, completely comprehensible.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:30 PM
Apr 2016

People who feel they are being overwhelmed and have a losing position (and are often of the privileged groups) will try to find anything they do to put themselves on top. They go the crazy route because they it see as an only alternative to succeed at their aims and beliefs.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
121. I doubt this is Brock or Clinton
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:12 PM
Apr 2016

However, it reveals a nasty mindset from partisans. 2001 comes to mind. For those alive and awake 1973 comes to mind

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
123. Here's a better image that I found on Reddit
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:34 PM
Apr 2016

It contains the sidebar as well, where Hillary supporters are congratulating the perp for alerting, and telling the perp to pease delete the revealing post so nothing reflects poorly on their group.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»huge facebook groups for ...