Keep on keeping on.

Any group.

but since she is all about the pander, what percentage of each GLBT, black, hispanic, muslim, catholic, atheist, jewish, native american and disabled americans will be in her cabinet?

Talk about SEXIST & misogynistic, and paternalistic.

I say this as a woman. My first business conference back in 1980 there were 98 men and ME.
I got there on my ability, not my gender.

Women was because of affirmative action.

I replied. you then said "that wasn't affirmative action"

So, are you saying the only people who have been systemically disadvantaged in the US are PoC?
Does affirmative action NOT support women, GLBT, and other groups?

in response to my saying your characterization of affirmative action as being quotas is not Affirmative Action.

are not always the answer: Carly Fiorina, Sarah Palin, Margaret Thatcher, Jan Brewer...

DINOS, war hawks and war profiteers, corporatists: Diane Feinstein, Blanche Lincoln, HRC...

She will ignight deep chauvinist fears by making statements like this. It might be good policy, but it's poltically stupidity!

Must have all male cabinet!

There is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with a cabinet that is half women, if it were the result of honest selection and vetting based on qualifications. A cabinet/administration SHOULD look like America.

But her statement and framing is just typical Clintonian pandering that is also unworkable if you take her at her word and look at it logically.

So she plans to use a demographic gender formula. Okay...

Then she also has to figure out what percentage of the population is LGBT -- and which percentage of those are L and G and B and T.

Then we have to go by ethnic composition. Percentage of AA and Latino and White, and other ethnicity. And then among those ethnic groups, figure out the percentage of how you would calculate the people who are of mixed race.

How many people have a disability? And which disability?

Income level? Should each income level be represented?

And then we finally start to get to actual qualifications for positions.

If you extend out her promise and accept it literally, there wiould be so many overlapping and paradoxical criteria that it wold be impossible to come up with an acceptable formula.

she can start with an incarcerated pot smoker and a homeless Iraq War vet. Those are two Americans she should be intimately familiar with.

He said that coming into office and pretty much kept his promise. That was one of the reasons he was hated so...long before the Monica affair. People didn't like how comfortable the Clintons were around and among blacks either. He came into office saying that he wanted to help change corporate board rooms to look more like America too. During his administration (with the help of Jesse Jackson and others) that happened. More AA CEOs and corporate presidents, and general manages were hired than previously under any other President and since.

actually running to help this country(other than the rich) you just want

to be the first woman president,it's all about YOU.

LOTs of women! Binders full of women!

and it will be crystal clear to boys that it is not only acceptable for them to be philanderers, their spouse should be willing to defend their behavior.

If so I don't care if they are atheist, transgender, mixed people that are black, asian, Hispanic, Irish, legitimate tribal natives, and yet secular Palestinians as well as Jews they are of little to no use.

Why has what you are and who you believe become more important than who you are and what you believe in to some folks?

been so impressive I can hardly wait for the next crew...

If it were me (and I'm only 51 ), I'd look at all qualified people of every race and gender. Hell, more than half of my cabinet might end up being women!