2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum“Correcting the Record”, An Attack on Free Speech
This comes just off as one of Hillary Clintons SuperPACs, Correct the Record, is running a multi-million dollar campaign to attack anybody who disagrees with her online. Leading this effort is David Brock, described by The Nation as a conservative journalistic assassin turned progressive empire-builder, and by Politico as a former right-wing journalist-turned-pro-Clinton crusader. Already, nearly $1 million dollars have been spent on internet trolls to attack, harass, and intimidate those who disagree with Mrs. Clinton, a strategy not unseen in countries with restrictive governments.
The Chinese government actively uses paid political trolls to drown out dissidents from the Party. The North Korean government, according to The Telegraph, has a 3,000 man troll army to drown out negative speech about the North Koreans. While extreme examples, this is exactly what Mrs. Clintons SuperPACs and supporters are doing, and are quite open about what they are doing. What they are doing is the destruction of the American values of free speech by harassment and intimidation.
Lets tell the truth about what these SuperPACs and supporters are doing. What theyre doing isnt Correcting the Record. Its pure political intimidation by skilled journalistic hawks with the express purpose of preventing political speech. Its attempting to erase a record, not correct one. With Mrs. Clintons record as it is, you can bet that is exactly what they are doing.
Snip
Link
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)joined not too long ago. Almost all of their posts are anti-Bernie. Often repeating the same points word-for-word. They are Herr Brock's Botbros.
rock
(13,218 posts)You're publishing this attack on free speech to object to what?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I think you may have just passed Ron Paul supporters in the conspiratorial loopiness department.
LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Just as I cannot. You can spout bullshit, and I can correct you. Tell you you're wrong. Shout you down. But that doesn't attack free speech. That's me practicing mine. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of consequences for what you say. NO ONE has to give you a platform to speak.
mythology
(9,527 posts)If not, please reread the 1st amendment. It doesn't say anything about people having to listen or not respond to you.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)It's why I draw attention to UBS: The Swiss bank is a perfect example of how the rich reward those who help them get richer and the middle class gets wiped out in the process -- especially politicians with an R and a lot with a D after their names.