Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:46 AM Apr 2016

“Correcting the Record”, An Attack on Free Speech

We cannot have a politician whose supporters and own SuperPAC blocks political speech. The right to free speech transcends political boundaries, it is a right afforded to every person in this country. A politician whose supporters and perhaps herself that is complicit in blocking the political free speech of any candidate’s supporters simply does not deserve anybody’s vote.

This comes just off as one of Hillary Clinton’s SuperPACs, Correct the Record, is running a multi-million dollar campaign to attack anybody who disagrees with her online. Leading this effort is David Brock, described by The Nation as a “conservative journalistic assassin turned progressive empire-builder”, and by Politico as a “former right-wing journalist-turned-pro-Clinton crusader.” Already, nearly $1 million dollars have been spent on “internet trolls” to attack, harass, and intimidate those who disagree with Mrs. Clinton, a strategy not unseen in countries with restrictive governments.

The Chinese government actively uses paid political trolls to drown out dissidents from the Party. The North Korean government, according to The Telegraph, has a 3,000 man troll army to drown out negative speech about the North Koreans. While extreme examples, this is exactly what Mrs. Clinton’s SuperPACs and supporters are doing, and are quite open about what they are doing. What they are doing is the destruction of the American values of free speech by harassment and intimidation.

Let’s tell the truth about what these SuperPACs and supporters are doing. What they’re doing isn’t “Correcting the Record”. It’s pure political intimidation by skilled journalistic hawks with the express purpose of preventing political speech. It’s attempting to erase a record, not correct one. With Mrs. Clinton’s record as it is, you can bet that is exactly what they are doing.


Snip

Link
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Correcting the Record”, An Attack on Free Speech (Original Post) LiberalArkie Apr 2016 OP
Check out all of those posters with around 600+ posts and who all Bohunk68 Apr 2016 #1
Let me make sure I got this rock Apr 2016 #2
Not sure you understand what constitutes free speech. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3
Well,congratulations Sanders supporters sufrommich Apr 2016 #4
Huh? LiberalArkie Apr 2016 #6
+ 1 JoePhilly Apr 2016 #7
Correct the record cannot attack free speech. Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2016 #5
Did Congress pass a law that says Sanders supporters can't post on the internet? mythology Apr 2016 #8
When your ideas can't stand up to scrutiny, you hire people to confuse the issue. Octafish Apr 2016 #9

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
1. Check out all of those posters with around 600+ posts and who all
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:18 AM
Apr 2016

joined not too long ago. Almost all of their posts are anti-Bernie. Often repeating the same points word-for-word. They are Herr Brock's Botbros.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
4. Well,congratulations Sanders supporters
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:23 AM
Apr 2016

I think you may have just passed Ron Paul supporters in the conspiratorial loopiness department.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
5. Correct the record cannot attack free speech.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:26 AM
Apr 2016

Just as I cannot. You can spout bullshit, and I can correct you. Tell you you're wrong. Shout you down. But that doesn't attack free speech. That's me practicing mine. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of consequences for what you say. NO ONE has to give you a platform to speak.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
8. Did Congress pass a law that says Sanders supporters can't post on the internet?
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:45 AM
Apr 2016

If not, please reread the 1st amendment. It doesn't say anything about people having to listen or not respond to you.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
9. When your ideas can't stand up to scrutiny, you hire people to confuse the issue.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:17 AM
Apr 2016

It's why I draw attention to UBS: The Swiss bank is a perfect example of how the rich reward those who help them get richer and the middle class gets wiped out in the process -- especially politicians with an R and a lot with a D after their names.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»“Correcting the Record”, ...