Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,595 posts)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:33 AM Apr 2016

California, Here I Come...

(cross-posted from my DKos account)

As the Primary race progresses, and the outcome look (to most analysts) increasingly bleak for Senator Sanders, his supporters keep point to California as a reason to stay in. With 475 delegates up for grabs it’s certainly the way to sweep to victory at the last minute, right?

Well, yes if your approach is “absolutely anything can happen” (even if it frequently doesn’t). Let’s take a look at the current standing, the California opportunity and what they say about Bernie’s path to victory.

First, the basic parameters. There are 4051 elected (no super) delegates. 2383 are required for nomination, but let’s accept for discussion that the goal is to win a majority of elected delegates and then compete for the supers.

Currently, Hillary Clinton has 1443 to Sanders 1208, with 1400 remaining to be awarded in 15 States, DC, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Island and Guam. California remains the largest prize, with 475 delegates up for grabs. All contests award delegates proportionally, some with a 15% minimum threshold.

Sanders folks and some early polling suggest that California will be a close race. But that’s the problem; close isn’t enough. WINNING isn’t enough. Even if he got 100% of California’s delegates, he’d still need 343 more out of the remaining States, and getting those remains a huge burden. Let’s look at some realistic and UNREALISTIC scenarios.

1. If Sanders tied Clinton in California, he’d to win 63% of EVERY OTHER STATE to get a majority of elected delegates.

2. If Sanders won California with 60% of the vote, (something only Jimmy Carter came close to doing in a competitive Primary) he’d need 57% of EVERY OTHER STATE. That’s a threshold he’s hit only three times in Primary States (NH, VT and WI).

3. Even if Sanders won California with an astounding 70% of the vote? He’d still need a majority of delegates in every other contest.


Needless to say, these numbers don’t take into account the five races today, where Clinton has large leads in the two largest States (PA and MD) and is ahead or close in the other three.

I’m not saying Sanders should withdraw or suspend his campaign at this point. But at least be realistic about where this is going to end up. Clinton will have the most votes. She’ll have the most elected delegates. And her superdelegates aren’t going to shift on the basis of national head-to-head polls seven months out. We have our nominee.

(nb — the data references here is based on FIVETHIRTYEIGHT’s tallies)

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
1. I think Hillary will win California.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:37 AM
Apr 2016

Her numbers among Latinos in NY were strong, and she's got the AA vote tied up. Not everyone in California lives in Marin County.

I agree that we should wait until after today's results. The numbers will favor Hillary a lot more if things go as I expect they will.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
11. Oh noes! Did someone alert one of my posts?
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:31 AM
Apr 2016

I wait with bated breath.

Wait, Sid. Are you suggesting that YOU alerted me for stealing your meme? Hm. I guess I would deserve that.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
16. results are in...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:22 AM
Apr 2016

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

disruptive, insensitive, over-the-top, inappropriate. Enough with the stick a fork in it graphics. This is nothing more than taunting Bernie supporters. Enough of this shit!

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:37 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sorry. Bernie is done. Stick a fork in him.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Another Hillary supporter doing everything they can to alienate the huge number of voters on the left not on board yet. Not just rude, but totally counterproductive. Knock. It. Off. Do you want to lose in November?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Grow a damn skin, people
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
3. Why is it the Hillary staff omit that SHE possibly will not have enough either?
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:57 AM
Apr 2016

Things that make you go hmmm.....

brooklynite

(94,595 posts)
4. Because it's not relevant...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:15 AM
Apr 2016

she'll have superdelegates and a majority of elected delegates which will add up to enough for nomination. Dream about poaching them if you want, but at least come up with a coherent argument about how you'll do it.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
13. This is the strategy of "supers don't count in the numerator only the denominator" bernie math
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:37 AM
Apr 2016

We take away all the supers from the candidates' delegate counts but leave them in the total when calculating the number of delegates necessary to reach 50%. That way, nobody gets nominated during the primaries. Bernie and Hillary show up at the convention and, if Hillary has not died of a brain hemorrhage or been arrested, a rainbow unicorn will magically appear and declare that Bernie is the nominee.

It's simple, really. Shall I explain it again?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
6. A few nit picks. All states have a 15% threshold.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:23 AM
Apr 2016

In fact only one candidate (possibly in the history of two person races) has failed to reach the 15% viability threshold: Hillary.

And if Bernie were to tie in CA, he would need 63% of the remaining non-CA pledged delegates, not 63% "of every other state." In other words, he would need 63% of the collective.

Finally, he has won 12 states by 58% or more, with 5 of those over 70%.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
10. I understand that, by my point is an important one.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:31 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie has won by very large margins in nearly all of his wins. In states where he is lied and Hillary disliked, he wins with landslides.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
12. Looks reasonable
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:36 AM
Apr 2016

But you'd better wait for the crowd to Bern the math and tell you its impossible for either candidate to win

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
15. A nitpick
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016
If Sanders won California with 60% of the vote, (something only Jimmy Carter came close to doing in a competitive Primary) he’d need 57% of EVERY OTHER STATE.



Jimmy Carter never won CA. He lost it in 76 to favorite son, Jerry Brown, and in 80 he lost it to Ted Kennedy.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»California, Here I Come.....