Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One has to wonder if it's possible to even have constructive dialogue (Original Post) G_j Apr 2016 OP
Hillary bought and paid for them through Brock, so no. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #1
And here's a fine example. This foolish poster believes that Hillary and Brock buy her supporters. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #5
maybe you missed this -- Correct the Record (ironic name)... GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #16
Maybe you forgot to read the OP up top. It has nothing to do with Brock. It has to do with trolls Trust Buster Apr 2016 #17
like you.....LOL RobertEarl Apr 2016 #21
How ironic that you're the type of poster the OP was talking about.....LOL Trust Buster Apr 2016 #23
No. You RobertEarl Apr 2016 #24
It starts here. Yesterday had a thread topic claiming that Hillary supporters aren't Democrats. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #2
The only explanation is that they were bought by Brock to make the BS cheerleaders look bad SFnomad Apr 2016 #3
Some of these posters are mentally unstable IMO. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #6
I think the mentally unstable are more grounded in reality at times n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #10
I can't stop laughing long enough to respond to such foolishness. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #12
It starts at the desk of David Brock - as Clinton is too callous to reign him in. Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #4
Did you read the short OP at all ? Trust Buster Apr 2016 #7
The lack of self awareness is stunning n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #9
It certainly is stunning. A Sanders supporter starts a thread decrying the fact that we can't have Trust Buster Apr 2016 #11
we can't have a reasonable discussion because of trolls RobertEarl Apr 2016 #22
"Brock" is just another of their signals that Hillary's wins are "illegitimate" alcibiades_mystery Apr 2016 #13
I did not stipulate who the trolls support G_j Apr 2016 #18
I was referring to the "most depraved of the Sandersites" alcibiades_mystery Apr 2016 #19
well thanks.. G_j Apr 2016 #20
I've wondered that too gollygee Apr 2016 #8
The problem is the circular logic Dem2 Apr 2016 #14
It's hard, but possible. Lot of deeply disturbed anti-social people LIVE online, it seems. closeupready Apr 2016 #15
But we've been dealing with the Fox watching and fact free and climate denying types for years pdsimdars Apr 2016 #25
To me its tough if people can't even see the corporate dominance/takeover berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #26
no sympathy from me creon Apr 2016 #27
Maybe watch The Body Snatchers felix_numinous Apr 2016 #28
There was never a time... jamese777 Apr 2016 #29
Yes -- it isn't. KPN Apr 2016 #30
 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
5. And here's a fine example. This foolish poster believes that Hillary and Brock buy her supporters.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:15 AM
Apr 2016

We're bought and paid for. We don't have the ability to have an independent opinion. As long as this crap continues to infiltrate this site, the war will not end.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
17. Maybe you forgot to read the OP up top. It has nothing to do with Brock. It has to do with trolls
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:27 AM
Apr 2016

like you.....LOL

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
21. like you.....LOL
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:47 PM
Apr 2016

They are wasting their money on DU. All the new support has gone to Bernie on DU. I doubt there are two people who changed their support to H because of DU. But probably hundreds changed to Bernie because of DU.

Ya know, they should spend more money on DU, help Skinner.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
2. It starts here. Yesterday had a thread topic claiming that Hillary supporters aren't Democrats.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:11 AM
Apr 2016

Today comes a thread asking if the Brock puppets will be happy tonight. It starts here. No excuses.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
11. It certainly is stunning. A Sanders supporter starts a thread decrying the fact that we can't have
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:22 AM
Apr 2016

a reasonable discussion because of trolls. And, another Sanders supporter responds by going on a rant about David Brock. The lack of self awareness is stunning. In that we agree.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
22. we can't have a reasonable discussion because of trolls
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:50 PM
Apr 2016

You got that right. The denial of the FBI investigation of H is proof. I had one tell me the FBI isn't. The lack of awareness is stunning and you are about to prove that, aren't you?

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
13. "Brock" is just another of their signals that Hillary's wins are "illegitimate"
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:24 AM
Apr 2016

The "trolls" episode is their balm for these coming primary losses. That the vast, vast, vast majority of Clinton voters never even heard of David Brock is clear to anyone who isn't a complete fanatic. But it doesn't scan for the most depraved of the Sandersites.

They have a new lotion each time they're about to get shellacked:

Bullhorn, Brooklyn, Brock, whatever.

The inability to accept an actual election loss is a key feature of totalitarianism.

G_j

(40,367 posts)
18. I did not stipulate who the trolls support
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:43 AM
Apr 2016

just that their increased presence makes constructive communication difficult.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
19. I was referring to the "most depraved of the Sandersites"
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:47 AM
Apr 2016

That's not you. You're among the best of them!



G_j

(40,367 posts)
20. well thanks..
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:12 AM
Apr 2016

don't know about that but, I tend to avoid even talking about Hillary. For me, Bernie's policies should be enough to win people over, or not.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
8. I've wondered that too
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:18 AM
Apr 2016

But it doesn't seem to me like either side wants constructive dialogue. Everyone is throwing garbage at the other candidate, regardless of whether it's reasonable.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
14. The problem is the circular logic
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:25 AM
Apr 2016

If one side is starting conspiracy theories from dawn until dusk, would it not be logical to assume the other side might wonder why they're being trolled and say "hey, cut it with the lies", which then engenders a reaction from the rumor mongers that they're being silenced?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
15. It's hard, but possible. Lot of deeply disturbed anti-social people LIVE online, it seems.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:26 AM
Apr 2016

If you are bored and have no one, it's an easy means of getting a kick or two.

Lately, I've begun actually DOING more stuff, and I do NOT miss my social media activities - or at least, the extent to which I was involved. It can actually be FUN to live, and rewarding.

Peace!

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
25. But we've been dealing with the Fox watching and fact free and climate denying types for years
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:36 PM
Apr 2016

It's just strange to deal with them supposedly on our side. But that's what they're like. Fact free and don't want to discuss.
And it isn't from both sides either. I have found Bernie people very eager to dialogue. But they also get fed up with the mud slinging and that is very understandable. Putting out facts and pushing back against lies is NOT the same as the mud slinging crowd.

berniepdx420

(1,784 posts)
26. To me its tough if people can't even see the corporate dominance/takeover
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:38 PM
Apr 2016

of our democracy... if they don't even see that ...

creon

(1,183 posts)
27. no sympathy from me
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:39 PM
Apr 2016

People here decided to act the way that they are acting.
It is not coerced or compelled.
It is purely voluntary.

Human beings are moral agents who make choices.

jamese777

(546 posts)
29. There was never a time...
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:51 PM
Apr 2016

In the history of the American republic there was never a time when politics was nice, polite and genteel.
Aaron Burr shot and killed Alexander Hamilton over political insults in 1804.

In the election of 1800 the Jefferson campaign accused their opponent John Adams of having "a hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman."
In return, the Adams' campaign called Vice President Jefferson "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father."
And those dudes were Founders!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»One has to wonder if it's...