They are responsible for a fair amount of his 'success.'

They complain he never gets any press and that he'd be winning by a landslide if they would just give him press time.

Then they say now he's had press time on MTP, and other shows, and everyone sees he's wonderful. He's so popular his rallies are packed, polls are packed, only Bernie signs in yards everywhere.

I believe the difference is only in the loudness of the Bernie supporters, and they have fallen for 'louder' means larger numbers' .
The numbers just aren't there.

Admittedly I don't watch TV much since I live in Seattle in a Comcast monopoly area where they do not offer service since it's a minority area and we're not profitable enough for them, but still when I have watched TV, I see the complete media black-out of him and his campaign. They refuse to cover him. Refuse to cover him.

For 30 years.

... frequency as many of (most of?) the people who gather at this web site. It's probably a mistake to assume that the cable-news viewing habits of others is a match for your (our?) viewing habits.

CNN pushed the momentum narrative a lot in their coverage, which has helped Sanders stay in the race.

Through promises of low taxes, corporate welfare, and to keep hands off the banksters, offers to launder cash and grease the skids of weapons deals for companies like Boeing.

Carlin was right. What's sad are the little people who really think they're part of the club now.

The first casualty of the new era will be net neutrality. Bookmark this.