2016 Postmortem

reddread

(6,896 posts) Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:15 PM Apr 2016

Pro-militarist Democrats in the aftermath of the IWR?

we need to draw a line somewhere
in or out, I am not straddling.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pro-militarist Democrats in the aftermath of the IWR? (Original Post) reddread Apr 2016 OP

If the democratic party is somehow now pro-military VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #1

I certainly dont mean "support the troops" militarist, I mean ends justifies the means militarist reddread Apr 2016 #2

That's totally what I meant. I should have worded it as "pro-imperialist regime change" VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #4

isnt that an area rich in discovery reddread Apr 2016 #5

double post reddread Apr 2016 #3

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)

1. If the democratic party is somehow now pro-military

Reply to reddread (Original post)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 03:36 PM

Apr 2016

That's just a sign that we need a viable third party, because an eagle cannot fly with two right wings.

reddread

(6,896 posts)

2. I certainly dont mean "support the troops" militarist, I mean ends justifies the means militarist

Reply to VulgarPoet (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:09 PM

Apr 2016

as if there were any end to it.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)

4. That's totally what I meant. I should have worded it as "pro-imperialist regime change"

Reply to reddread (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:16 PM

Apr 2016

because these people sure as fuck do not support the troops.

reddread

(6,896 posts)

5. isnt that an area rich in discovery

Reply to VulgarPoet (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:37 PM

Apr 2016

what the "troops" endure and die for,
makes me ashamed.

reddread

(6,896 posts)

3. double post

Reply to VulgarPoet (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:10 PM

Apr 2016

twice the nice.

Reply to this discussion