Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:06 PM Apr 2016

About Acting Presidential: For me integrity is a KEY component of acting Presidential.


They have made fun of Bernie because he doesn't buy $1,000 suits. However, with his demeanor and integrity he is the only one to me that acts Presidential.

Please tell me how "with a cloth" and we came, we saw, he died (laugh, laugh, laugh) is acting presidential.

Even Seymour Hersch said Hillary's comment about Qaddafi was bizarre.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
About Acting Presidential: For me integrity is a KEY component of acting Presidential. (Original Post) Skwmom Apr 2016 OP
What integrity. He registered in 2015 as a Democrat so underthematrix Apr 2016 #1
The Democrats approved of his running and they are using his integrity, his authenticity, and his Skwmom Apr 2016 #2
The Democrats? You must mean the DNC underthematrix Apr 2016 #11
he sold his independence to run as democrat because that's where the money is. not msongs Apr 2016 #3
If you think Nader was bad, can you imagine what a Bernie independent candidacy would have been? highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #4
As far as I am concerned, you would get your wish. I would sign up right now. djean111 Apr 2016 #8
None of the Big 3 have it. bigwillq Apr 2016 #5
Sanders doesn't have integrity? MisterP Apr 2016 #15
At times bigwillq Apr 2016 #18
Hillary has enough money to buy all the integrity anyone could possibly want Fumesucker Apr 2016 #6
I don't recall making fun of his suits. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #7
Continuing to tel his supporters he is in it to win it and please send money fun n serious Apr 2016 #9
Yeah, like suing the DNC when your campaign is guilty of stealing data? nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #10
You're a little behind - 840high Apr 2016 #13
Bernie only added "democratic" to his self avowed "socialist" moniker when redstateblues Apr 2016 #12
Do you understand what a socialist is? Skwmom Apr 2016 #14
When you have integrity, being presidential isn't an act. nt Snotcicles Apr 2016 #16
Your post is lovely and true. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #17

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
1. What integrity. He registered in 2015 as a Democrat so
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:11 PM
Apr 2016

he could use the DEMOCRATIC establishment to run his campaign. Then he sued the DNC. If Bernie had any real integrity, he would have run as an independent and built the national, state and local infrastructure to make that happen.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
2. The Democrats approved of his running and they are using his integrity, his authenticity, and his
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:13 PM
Apr 2016

HONEST message to attract new voters. They would be in trouble without him.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
11. The Democrats? You must mean the DNC
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:27 PM
Apr 2016

His message is not honest if he is running under the DEMOCRAT banner and engaging in all sorts of mischief to undermine the DEM party.

msongs

(67,443 posts)
3. he sold his independence to run as democrat because that's where the money is. not
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:17 PM
Apr 2016

to mention all that anti-war baloney from a guy who is a big military spender

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
4. If you think Nader was bad, can you imagine what a Bernie independent candidacy would have been?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:20 PM
Apr 2016

Believe you, you wouldn't want to know. He did the honorable thing. He ran as a Democrat, and he has helped the Democrats have something of a news cycle and something of a broadening of their base, if they can just hold onto it.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
8. As far as I am concerned, you would get your wish. I would sign up right now.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:26 PM
Apr 2016
The DNC is using Bernie. They assumed he would be a flash in the pan, bow out early, and hand his grassroots organization, his supporters, and his war chest over to Hillary, without Hillary having to pretend to be liberal or progressive. Or even a Democrat.

What has happened blindsided them. I was sick of the party anyway, living here in Florida and watching Debbie DINO campaign for GOP cronies and refuse the give DNC support to liberals. Watching how Debbie and Bill Nelson and Gwen Graham vote with the GOP. Watching how Patrick Murphy switched to Dem ONLY because he wanted to run against another Republican, and be hugged and welcomed by Debbie and Hillary. In 2012.

The Democratic Party is being taken over by the Third Way. That New Democrat Coalition is advised by them, and their agenda is to eschew that silly old ideology and work with the GOP. Which, of course, results in doing what the GOP and the 1% wanted to do anyway.

So - I am out after I vote for Grayson, in August primary. I cannot belong to a party that stands for war and fracking and the TPP and cluster bombs and bloody intervention and says NO to Single payer. The Third Way wins, we the people lose, and I won't enable them. Has nothing to do with Bernie - Bernie just pulled the curtain back and exposed how the Democratic Party has slid over to the right. I am not going with it, that's all.
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
5. None of the Big 3 have it.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:21 PM
Apr 2016

Sorry, but they don't.
Not Trump.
Not Clinton.
Not Bernie.

All three have acted the fool at one time or another this election cycle.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
18. At times
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

But him and his campaign have done some questionable things this cycle, as the rest have.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
12. Bernie only added "democratic" to his self avowed "socialist" moniker when
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 09:31 PM
Apr 2016

He decided to run for President. That reeks of opportunitism not integrity.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
17. Your post is lovely and true.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

Ignore the sneering Hillary supporters. They don't get it. The willful blindness and willingness to tell lies to support their candidate is similar to that of cigarette executives who took forever to admit cigarette smoking caused cancer or oil company executives to believe in climate change.

At some point you just have to realize the OBNOXIOUS Hillary supporters aren't interested in reality and there are probably financial reasons for the "willful ignorance". Whether that is working for the campaign, or being a recipient of Clinton fundraising money, or whatever, it's just bad judgment, and like Bush voting Republicans in 2004, you can't fix the stupid. Maybe they really are Republican operatives out to destroy the party? How else to describe the venom?

It will get better. At least I hope so!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»About Acting Presidential...