Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:17 PM Apr 2016

Dear Democrats: Stop Bullying Sanders Supporters into Backing Hillary Clinton

Democrats are setting themselves up for a crushing loss in November unless Clinton backers stop bullying Bernie Sanders supporters. Here’s why.

Neither candidate will clinch the nomination before the convention
After losing four out of five primaries on Tuesday, the overwhelming question from Hillary Clinton supporters is whether or not the legions of voters backing Bernie Sanders will fall in line, accept Clinton’s inevitable coronation, and vote for her to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. This is an unfair and illegitimate question, and completely ignores why Sanders was able to activate so many people across the country and nearly 9 million people thus far to vote for him.

That question of whether or not Bernie Sanders’ voters will support Clinton ignores the fact that out of the remaining 1,016 pledged delegates, neither Hillary Clinton nor Bernie Sanders will reach 2,383 pledged delegates before the Democratic National Convention in July. Almost half of those delegates will come from California alone.

This is significant, as Sanders is steadily closing in on Clinton’s polling edge in the state, cutting her lead down from double digits to just two points. As such, he has a very good chance of winning the state, given that California’s primary allows independent voters to vote in the Democratic primary. In terms of pledged delegates, Sanders may very well be within two percentage points of Clinton at the DNC if he wins 60 percent of the remaining pledged delegates. This is not an unlikely scenario, given the favorable outlook of the remaining states.

In other words, Hillary Clinton will only be the Democratic nominee if superdelegates tip the scales for her on the first ballot. Assuming Clinton already has the nomination locked up, with over 1,000 pledged delegates still at play in states mostly favorable to Sanders, is unrealistic and naive. Democrats’ bullying of Sen. Sanders supporters to betray their candidate and vote for his rival is premature and divisive.

The Democratic Party desperately needs new blood
By attempting to turn the Democratic primary into a coronation for Hillary Clinton, Democratic Party leaders have shown they aren’t interested in cultivating new leaders or increasing engagement among younger voters. The fact that the Democratic establishment’s only choice to lead the party in 2016 is the candidate who lost the last contested primary eight years ago speaks volumes.

Establishment Democrats have a bad habit of running loser candidates. In Wisconsin, moderate Democrat Tom Barrett, who lost by 5 points to Scott Walker in the 2010 gubernatorial election, was the state party’s top choice to run against Gov. Walker after activists successfully triggered a recall election. Despite Barrett’s establishment endorsements from Bill Clinton and Rahm Emanuel, he lost by an even wider margin to Walker in the recall election.

In fact, aside from re-electing President Obama in 2012, Democrats have been losing badly across the nation for six consecutive years. There are only 18 Democratic governors currently in office, the fewest in over a century. Only 43 percent of all state legislators across the United States are Democrats while 56 percent are Republicans — a trend of waning Democratic power at the state level continuing unabated since 2012. If anything, Democrats should be welcoming Sanders’ supporters and their ideas into the party if they’re interested in having any hope for future elections.

Current Democratic Party leaders are fresh out of ideas
Democrats currently holding office have shown little in the way of strategy for how to enact progressive policy victories. As US Uncut reported earlier this week, leading Democrats in Congress, like Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, are actually aligning with the pharmaceutical industry to fight their own president’s efforts to lower prescription drug prices. And even though they’re bending over backwards to elect Hillary Clinton, Congressional Democrats have no strategy or will to retake the House of Representatives.

Even if Hillary Clinton, who is running as a “progressive who likes to get things done” is elected, how does she plan to get things done with Republican majorities in the House and Senate? And if the Democratic Party’s leader in the House is already scheming against a Democratic president, how does Clinton plan to even rally her own party to pass meaningful legislation?
Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, has brought new blood and new ideas to the Democratic Party, and manages to fill arenas full of supporters and break voter turnout records in many of the states he’s won. Sanders is the first Democrat to bring New Deal policies back to the Democratic Party since the Clinton-led corporate takeover of the Democratic Party in the nineties.

These policies — like tuition-free public universities, universal healthcare as a human right, and a massive investment in millions of new public sector jobs — motivate young people and independent voters to register as Democrats and vote for Sanders. If Democrats want to keep the White House in November, they should push Hillary Clinton to adopt as many as possible.

Hillary Clinton and the DNC have no interest in bringing in new blood or new ideas


>snip>
In January, the party chairwoman, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, appointed dozens of Clinton supporters and advisers to the three standing committees of the Democratic Party convention. Of 45 potential members submitted by Mr. Sanders, she appointed just three, according to Mr. Sanders’s campaign.

More here:http://usuncut.com/politics/democrats-dnc-bullying-sanders/

92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dear Democrats: Stop Bullying Sanders Supporters into Backing Hillary Clinton (Original Post) Playinghardball Apr 2016 OP
2156 vs. 1412 n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #1
Your math is off, there were no where near as many pledged Delegates awarded so far, perhaps Dragonfli Apr 2016 #15
I'm not CNN ... I'm looking at the complete picture. n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #16
Without listening to the DNC spokesperson discussing how SD votes should not be counted until cast? Dragonfli Apr 2016 #19
I'm looking at a picture called reality ... the BS cheerleaders should visit it sometime n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #20
How does that have anything to do with your incorrect math? Also incomplete, the primary isn't over Dragonfli Apr 2016 #22
#BernieMath ... no relation to reality SFnomad Apr 2016 #24
Incorrect, you are still counting uncast votes. watch the video, and listen this time. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #26
Peddle your denial elsewhere n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #33
Correct your math correct the record, I get you now. on Ignore. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #35
Ignoring reality ... typical of the BS cheerleader. n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #38
Reality: Yuuge spilt in Dem party-Progressives massively rejecting conservative Dem Hillary Clinton JimDandy Apr 2016 #56
I am recommending we don't respond to the first responder. They are using a tactic to rhett o rick Apr 2016 #37
Already put them on ignore, should have done it sooner, but I did get this in! Dragonfli Apr 2016 #43
Great. Thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #46
So you just want to live in your own fact free bubble? So similar to the right wing echo chamber. SFnomad Apr 2016 #45
What an ironic thing to say. Your side has never wanted to discuss issues. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #47
LOL ... you people are funny ... I got the "number one" slot (which didn't take any effort) and that SFnomad Apr 2016 #50
It doesn't look like you are here to discuss. It looks more like you're here to T-bag for Hillary. That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #58
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service eggplant Apr 2016 #61
43% and growing artislife Apr 2016 #41
They are. Nice. Just misguided. Skink Apr 2016 #2
I disagree with "nice." merrily Apr 2016 #3
Sorry, but your ideas are just incorrect Raastan Apr 2016 #4
We'll see how far you get thinking that way. Including the minority protects the majority. snowy owl Apr 2016 #12
Wow, you guys just don't get it do you. People are literally dying because some rhett o rick Apr 2016 #42
+1 pinebox Apr 2016 #71
Exactly! potone Apr 2016 #79
No one person will save us. Raastan Apr 2016 #89
If the election is about status quo versus long overdue change, Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #67
I guess ignoring super-delegates is one way to keep a fantasy going. nt BootinUp Apr 2016 #5
You mean lobbyists? nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #7
thanks, also calling them something else and then ignoring them. nt BootinUp Apr 2016 #8
No, there are some lobbyists in the group. They get some of the coveted Super slots. silvershadow Apr 2016 #18
Are you for them or against them? fun n serious Apr 2016 #30
No that's the DNC's insider game. The fact that they exist, I mean. Since they DO exist I silvershadow Apr 2016 #31
He is correct, some supers are lobbyists pinebox Apr 2016 #73
You know that Bernies strategy is to court these people right? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #81
They should be ignored. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #13
Fine. Then subtract them from the number needed to win. She needs 35.5% BootinUp Apr 2016 #21
I'm fully aware. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #23
Not ignored, one should wait until they vote, counting unvoted votes is like adding CA. votes now. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #17
If you think that the middle class circling the drain is a good thing, or that tax payer money GoneFishin Apr 2016 #6
And Hillary will continue that voodoo that we do so well. JeffHead Apr 2016 #29
If you're honest about wanting to fight the power nini Apr 2016 #9
Better yet, bvar22 Apr 2016 #88
More like, stop posting rightwing talking points and just get over it. procon Apr 2016 #10
So the choice is flobee1 Apr 2016 #76
The DNC is gut-churningly disgusting in its present form. bjo59 Apr 2016 #11
Maybe it's because a lot of Sanders' supporters are very young or Independents and new to the Beacool Apr 2016 #14
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/29/AR2008032901909.html Gwhittey Apr 2016 #25
She did and at the convention released her delegates so that Obama Beacool Apr 2016 #28
And while you're at it, remind them the history and "why" the Superdelegates were silvershadow Apr 2016 #36
Maybe it's because many of Bernie's supporters aren't Dems but indy's. pinebox Apr 2016 #72
We'll see. So far, she polls better than Trump. Beacool Apr 2016 #87
Everybody should be able to vote pinebox May 2016 #91
Everybody does have a chance to vote in the general elections. Beacool May 2016 #92
1) It's clinched. 2) Trump will drive GOP women into Clinton camp. 3) Plenty of ideas in play. ucrdem Apr 2016 #27
She will get zero GOP votes AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #51
Rrpublican woman are not going to vote for Clinton. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #57
I've heard older republican women say Karma13612 Apr 2016 #66
dont MFM008 Apr 2016 #32
Exactly Renew Deal Apr 2016 #40
K&R Only post that makes sense. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #84
Bullying is a strong word creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #34
After years of disparaging the Left the Conservative/Clinton Wing of the party are trying rhett o rick Apr 2016 #44
Disparaging the left? No. We disparage the assholes. ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #54
"People are dying because of the greed that your side embraces" pinebox Apr 2016 #74
Clinton and Sanders have similar platforms creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #55
Really? War, means-testing Social Security instead of raising the cap? Hillary says NO djean111 Apr 2016 #80
Oh fuck. More Republicon projection. Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #52
I don't see any bullying. But I do see a lot of selfishness from one camp. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #39
Your understanding of the definition of Bullying GulfCoast66 Apr 2016 #48
Figure out a better way to sell your candidate and take a break from disparaging Bernie Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #53
My Candidate? GulfCoast66 Apr 2016 #60
Not true: Karma13612 Apr 2016 #68
I agree GulfCoast66 Apr 2016 #83
we'll see. I seriously don't expect to be that simple. eom Karma13612 Apr 2016 #86
Yep. Any day now it's going to change... just wait... wait for it... COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #85
"Your pathetic attempt to be considered some kind of victim" Yeah, the Clntons own that. That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #59
Right wing doesn't come with an off switch AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #49
The Democratic Party can work to include Bernie supporters or it can shit on them as many DUers highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #62
Coercion of progressives has been the Democratic play for decades now. Maedhros Apr 2016 #63
I support the post. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #64
+10 eom Karma13612 Apr 2016 #69
Sanders supporters: stop trashing the Democratic candidate. Other than that, do whatever you want. Squinch Apr 2016 #65
OK as long as posting about racist, xenophobic republicans is not defined as "bullying". n/t pampango Apr 2016 #70
I find that bullies are ALWAYS the biggest chickenshits. 99Forever Apr 2016 #75
Dead on BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #82
Bullying is the MO for BS supporters. Blame the crime on the victims just like the BS suit against Jitter65 Apr 2016 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #78
K&R emsimon33 Apr 2016 #90

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
15. Your math is off, there were no where near as many pledged Delegates awarded so far, perhaps
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:59 PM
Apr 2016

a new calculator is in order?

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
19. Without listening to the DNC spokesperson discussing how SD votes should not be counted until cast?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:06 AM
Apr 2016

The picture you are looking at comes from the school of art known as surrealism.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
22. How does that have anything to do with your incorrect math? Also incomplete, the primary isn't over
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:23 AM
Apr 2016

reality is still forming, we were discussing your incorrect math at the present time. If you want to count votes not yet cast, you might as well paint your surrealism with all the possible yet to be cast votes both pledged and super-privileged.

Your picture would still be incorrect but complete and would then be more than what is now, not just a sketch of a work in progress, but with strokes you added that the artist hasn't yet committed to canvass.

Correct your math, or admit you are either very poor at math skills, or are including votes that are not even cast yet just to make things appear more slanted than they are.

I think they call that spin on TV, It is called bullshit in the real world.


Most assuredly not objective reality.






 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
24. #BernieMath ... no relation to reality
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:27 AM
Apr 2016

2156 vs. 1412 ... the complete picture of the Democratic Primaries. Anything else is denial.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
26. Incorrect, you are still counting uncast votes. watch the video, and listen this time.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

Reality is what it is and Hilary is ahead, but your numbers are #eggsbeforetheyrehatchedmath.

I have no more time to talk to someone that can't even do simple math, but adds numbers thinking the teacher will call him/her pet.

You are playing dumb, I have little time or patience fore feigned stupidity. Peddle your poor math skills elsewhere.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
56. Reality: Yuuge spilt in Dem party-Progressives massively rejecting conservative Dem Hillary Clinton
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:51 AM
Apr 2016

And the Independents are with us.

Que Sera, Sera..

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
37. I am recommending we don't respond to the first responder. They are using a tactic to
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:50 AM
Apr 2016

get the first response slot. And if they have under 500 posts, on the ignore list they go.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
45. So you just want to live in your own fact free bubble? So similar to the right wing echo chamber.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

There was a time you had less than 500 posts, were your worth less then? Anyway, I have more than 500 posts. And this just added one more.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
47. What an ironic thing to say. Your side has never wanted to discuss issues.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

Your efforts to get the number one response slot indicates to me that you are not here to discuss.

I am tired of the tactics of your side to, in my opinion, disrupt. Bob-Bye

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
50. LOL ... you people are funny ... I got the "number one" slot (which didn't take any effort) and that
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:16 AM
Apr 2016

means I'm not here to discuss. I'm more than willing to discuss, but the crap that the BS cheerleaders post shows they're not interested in reality. They just want to Bern the House Down.

 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
58. It doesn't look like you are here to discuss. It looks more like you're here to T-bag for Hillary.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:10 AM
Apr 2016

Currently it looks like Clinton will get the most delegates before the Primary, but she will not get enough to win the nomination outright. When Clinton ran against President Obama, she didn't concede as quickly as she wants Bernie to. Bernie hasn't referenced the RFK assassination as a reason to continue. In any event, it's not over 'til it's over.

You think Clinton is the greatest Dem evah and we should all line up behind her? Ok, fine, but realize that different people are not going to share your opinion. What can Clinton do to unify the Party? "I'm not a republican", isn't good enough for me anymore. Personally, I think I'm too sexist and racist to vote for Clinton, but Jill Stein on the other hand...

eggplant

(3,913 posts)
61. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:41 AM
Apr 2016
Damn, I thought for sure it would have been 0-7.

On Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

So you just want to live in your own fact free bubble? So similar to the right wing echo chamber.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1868748

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

No comments added by alerter

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:34 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Tsk tsk tsk. Someone doesn't like being called on their BS.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Primaries forum: People are gonna talk shit all day to each other and say uglies back and forth. I don't want to see anyone on either side timed out or worse just for blowing steam unless they really do make a personal attack that goes beyond opinion. Most of the alerts I've been seeing here are based more in candidate support rather than reality.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You want me to hide a post that were too lazy to even write a comment about?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Extremely rude post - hide it.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Raastan

(266 posts)
4. Sorry, but your ideas are just incorrect
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:28 PM
Apr 2016

When your candidate of choice looses the primary, it is painful. Most of us have been there before. But there is no need to gather your stuff and go off in a huff,either. The Republicans are the real enemies to defeat now.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
12. We'll see how far you get thinking that way. Including the minority protects the majority.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:49 PM
Apr 2016

Our government is based on something addressing the tyranny of the majority over the minority. Clinton might think about that if she's going to be President.

. For one, a defining characteristic of democracy must be the people's right to change the majority through elections. This right is the people's "supreme authority." The minority, therefore, must have the right to seek to become the majority and possess all the rights necessary to compete fairly in elections—speech, assembly, association, petition—since otherwise the majority would make itself permanent and become a dictatorship. For the majority, ensuring the minority's rights becomes a matter of self-interest, since it must utilize the same rights when it is in minority to seek to become a majority again.


www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1251&pid=1868441
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
42. Wow, you guys just don't get it do you. People are literally dying because some
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:55 AM
Apr 2016

Democrats are not willing to fight for those among us that are suffering. They are content to settle for the status quo. I believe this is a do or die primary to save our party from the Wealthy and Super Wealthy, and to save our country NOT FROM THE REPUBLICONS but from the Oligarchy that are stealing our wealth and resources. Even the Koch Bros support Clinton.

potone

(1,701 posts)
79. Exactly!
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:02 AM
Apr 2016

And not only our country, but the world! While I support Bernie for his other policies, for me the clincher is global warming. I don't see Clinton being willing to make the drastic changes that will have to be made to address this crisis.

If we continue to let the mega corporations determine our policies, we are all doomed. I just can't fathom the level of denial that is necessary to pretend that we can tinker around making small and largely symbolic changes to our energy sources and that will be adequate. What we have to realize is that the oligarchy does know that we are headed for disaster and they just don't care. They think that they will survive no matter what and they are planning for it. I don't know how they think that they will be able to maintain their wealth and their lifestyles if New York and other major cities are under water, but somehow they do. This kind of delusional thinking is suicidal for everyone.

So I am wondering when Hillary supporters will start agitating for serious action on this issue, and demanding that Hillary do so. I have heard very little from her on this topic.

Raastan

(266 posts)
89. No one person will save us.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:08 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie has no congressional support and never will. A president is not a super hero; they enforce the law, not make law. HRC has the best chance to initiate the changes we all agree need to be made.
And the Koch brothers realize HRC would be a better president, not that they endorse her...

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
67. If the election is about status quo versus long overdue change,
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:06 AM
Apr 2016

why would we vote for the status quo to defeat the status quo?

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
18. No, there are some lobbyists in the group. They get some of the coveted Super slots.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:05 AM
Apr 2016

You weren't aware of that?

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
31. No that's the DNC's insider game. The fact that they exist, I mean. Since they DO exist I
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:44 AM
Apr 2016

would expect him to make his case to them. Would be much better if they did't exist. Hate the game, not the player. He can't change the game from outside.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
13. They should be ignored.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:54 PM
Apr 2016

In a rational world, only elected delegates count. I'm fine with supers being guaranteed attendance at the convention. Period.

BootinUp

(47,194 posts)
21. Fine. Then subtract them from the number needed to win. She needs 35.5%
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:12 AM
Apr 2016

of the remaining pledged delegates to reach the adjusted amount.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
17. Not ignored, one should wait until they vote, counting unvoted votes is like adding CA. votes now.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:03 AM
Apr 2016

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
6. If you think that the middle class circling the drain is a good thing, or that tax payer money
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:32 PM
Apr 2016

should be spent on regime change so multinationals can go into what's left of the countries to steal their stuff, then Hillary is your candidate.

No can do.

JeffHead

(1,186 posts)
29. And Hillary will continue that voodoo that we do so well.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:40 AM
Apr 2016

She loves the smell of regime change in the morning.

nini

(16,672 posts)
9. If you're honest about wanting to fight the power
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:37 PM
Apr 2016

you sure as shit better vote for the side that will give you the better Supreme Court justice because a lot of crap is going to be decided by them.

Anything short of that and you're all a bunch of whiny hypocrites.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
88. Better yet,
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:13 PM
Apr 2016

Vote for the person who wins against all Republicans by much larger margins than Hillary.
That would be the smart play.

procon

(15,805 posts)
10. More like, stop posting rightwing talking points and just get over it.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:41 PM
Apr 2016

I don't care if Bernie fans can't bring themselves to actually support Hillary, that's fine, no problemo at all. I do care that as Democrats, unaligned, Independents, and liberals and progressives, that we all want to keep the White House in control of the Democrats rather than see it fall into Republican hands. Best find some common ground, because whether some of you like it or not, it's going to be Hillary, regardless of how much that sticks in your craw. She's going to be the closest any of us come to in holding the presidency, and everything that stands for, during the next 4/8 years, Gods save us from the alternative if we fail to pull this off.

flobee1

(870 posts)
76. So the choice is
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:36 AM
Apr 2016

Eat bitter fruit that leaves an aftertaste for decades or bitter fruit that leaves an aftertaste for years?
And anyone that decides that not taking a bite is delusional?
"Just eat it, there will be sweet fruit next time"


Nah, sorry.
I dont believe that story anymore

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
14. Maybe it's because a lot of Sanders' supporters are very young or Independents and new to the
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 11:59 PM
Apr 2016

Democratic party's election process, but I don't remember this constant harping about the legitimacy and role of super delegates in 2008.

Listen up, it isn't complicated. The super delegates will support the candidate who has the most pledged delegates. In 2008 that candidate was Obama, albeit by a razor thin 102 pledged delegates. The popular vote was very close too.

This year the winning candidate is Hillary, she has almost triple the amount of pledged delegates that Obama had 8 years ago. That's all there is to it. Goodness knows that it hurts like hell to lose (been there done that in 2008), but it is what it is.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
28. She did and at the convention released her delegates so that Obama
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:36 AM
Apr 2016

could be nominated by proclamation.

Will Sanders do the same?


 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
36. And while you're at it, remind them the history and "why" the Superdelegates were
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:50 AM
Apr 2016

created in the first place...and when, to provide full context.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
72. Maybe it's because many of Bernie's supporters aren't Dems but indy's.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:17 AM
Apr 2016

Therein lies the difference.

I vote for progressives, not parties.

Hillary will lose a GE. Millions of people hate her on every side imaginable and 55% of Dem vote is a guaranteed loss in a GE.
We've been saying this to you guys forever. She is the weakest candidate in a GE

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
87. We'll see. So far, she polls better than Trump.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
Apr 2016

If you're an Independent, then why should you have a say on who Democrats choose as their nominee? If you're not a member of a club, would you be allowed to decide who runs it?



 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
91. Everybody should be able to vote
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:04 AM
May 2016

This isn't Sam's Club.
Anything less is suppression. Otherwise don't cater the Indy vote in a GE.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
92. Everybody does have a chance to vote in the general elections.
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:56 PM
May 2016

Primaries are about choosing the nominee of a party. If someone wants to vote in a primary, then they should join a party of their choice. I live in a closed primary state. I know that if I want to vote in June I have to be a member of either party or stay home. I'm fine with that. IMO, all primaries should be closed.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
27. 1) It's clinched. 2) Trump will drive GOP women into Clinton camp. 3) Plenty of ideas in play.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

4) Huge registration surges reported in California, largely Democratic, largely Latino.

Nothing to worry about.

Karma13612

(4,554 posts)
66. I've heard older republican women say
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:05 AM
Apr 2016

That they don't feel a woman should be president.

And that they will just vote for their husbands choice.

I kid you not!

MFM008

(19,820 posts)
32. dont
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:44 AM
Apr 2016

dont vote
dont show up
vote for Trump
Vote for Stein
vote for Spongebob.
Just stop the infernal whining about it.

creeksneakers2

(7,476 posts)
34. Bullying is a strong word
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

I don't believe you are being bullied. Looks like another persecution fantasy to me.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
44. After years of disparaging the Left the Conservative/Clinton Wing of the party are trying
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:01 AM
Apr 2016

to, not to be friends, but demand we support the candidate that stands for everything we are fighting against. Well you have your hubris to keep you warm. Best start looking for a scapegoat to blame for you loses.

People are dying because of the greed that your side embraces.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
54. Disparaging the left? No. We disparage the assholes.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:28 AM
Apr 2016

The hate-filled clowns who spend most of their time attacking Democrats rather than Republicans and imagine that they speak for 99% of Americans, when they don't even speak for the majority of Sanders supporters, the vast majority of which are just fine with Hillary as their second choice. People who literally can't even write a screed whining about how down and dirty the conversation has become (which is almost entirely instigated by their side) without spewing angry lies.

People are dying because of the greed that your side embraces.
Case in point.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
74. "People are dying because of the greed that your side embraces"
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:24 AM
Apr 2016

Are you upset about reality?
He is correct in what he said & yet you stand here basically defending it?
Sorry but peoples lives are more important than you worrying about someone attacking Dems. Just like how Dems were wrong when they gutted SNAP.

creeksneakers2

(7,476 posts)
55. Clinton and Sanders have similar platforms
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:29 AM
Apr 2016

Nobody can "demand" that you support a candidate. Very dramatic post.

I don't have to start looking for a scapegoat. If we lose a close race it will because the Sanders supporters, for all their dramatic talk about caring, really don't care if a Republican takes the country to Hell.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
80. Really? War, means-testing Social Security instead of raising the cap? Hillary says NO
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:07 AM
Apr 2016

to single payer? Hillary says NO to free (paid for by taxes on her buddies) college, because "why pay for rich people"? Bullshit bogus argument. Bernie says no to fracking, Hillary's says hey, it is probably okay, I will look into it - really, I think she is fine with it if it only impacts poor neighborhoods. Shilling for the TPP and calling it the gold standard, and then pandering and back-tracking? Saying that hey, I am good with adding some restrictions to abortion rights? That is just a few things.

The only thing Bernie's and Hillary's platforms have in common, really, is that they are both in English. And Bernie's is truthful, and Hillary will pander for votes, so not believable on whatever she says she agrees with Bernie about.

Gotta say I don't really give a flying fuck who gets blamed when Hillary runs and loses, if she gets the nomination. Big fucking deal. Blamed by people who are okay with war and fracking and the TPP and cluster bombs. Would be an honor.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
48. Your understanding of the definition of Bullying
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:10 AM
Apr 2016

Is as poor as your understanding of how politics works in this country. I do not love Clinton, but she has this pretty well wrapped up.

And only someone who has never really been Bullied can considered condescending comments on a website they choose to visit bullying.

Your pathetic attempt to be considered some kind of victim would be humorous if not for the fact that there are lots of folk who truly are bullied in scenarios they cannot avoid.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
53. Figure out a better way to sell your candidate and take a break from disparaging Bernie
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:23 AM
Apr 2016

supporters. If you do manage to grab the nomination, you have a pretty tough job in front of you.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
60. My Candidate?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:37 AM
Apr 2016

Please re-read my post. I do not love either candidate and I am not disparaging Bernie. But only a hard core Bernie supporter who when told that his candidate is losing badly would think that Bullying is occurring. No one is forced to visit this site. And if you visit for a while and choose to leave, no one can track you down. Calling anything that happens here Bullying is an insult to all the kids, and adults who are actual victim of true bullying on a daily basis.

But it is well know that most of Bernie supporters are Millennials. And if you have been given a trophy for coming in 5th place your entire life, it must hurt to have someone tell you that you are full of shit.

Karma13612

(4,554 posts)
68. Not true:
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:10 AM
Apr 2016
But it is well known that most of Bernie supporters are Millennials


That is where people are making a big big big mistake

Let's wait for the rest of the states to vote and then analyze where we are.

The convention is going to be historic.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
85. Yep. Any day now it's going to change... just wait... wait for it...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:10 AM
Apr 2016

wait til the rest of the states vote... when the convention comes... you'll see...

Predictable. And by now, really, really boring.

 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
59. "Your pathetic attempt to be considered some kind of victim" Yeah, the Clntons own that.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:19 AM
Apr 2016

No one plays the victim better than the Clintons.

Why are you so angry about the original OP?

And only someone who has never really been Bullied can considered condescending comments on a website they choose to visit bullying.


Well it's not HillaryClintonUndergound.com yet, so people are able meet up and discuss whatever. Now if they were trying to post in the Hillary Clinton group and started complaining about bullying, you would have a point. So what is the purpose of condescending comments if it's not bullying?
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
62. The Democratic Party can work to include Bernie supporters or it can shit on them as many DUers
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:27 AM
Apr 2016

do right here.

We're all human beings, I presume.

How do you act when people shit on you? They have free will. They will vote for Hillary or Trump or not at all.

The bigger question is whether Hillary and the party will choose to accept and include a very large number of fired up people who only want things that Democrats have traditionally wanted.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
63. Coercion of progressives has been the Democratic play for decades now.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:42 AM
Apr 2016

Vote for us, despite our lack of vision or fighting spirit, OR ELSE...

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
64. I support the post.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:13 AM
Apr 2016

This primary cycle has seen a lot of manipulation and control. I was horrified when I realized the super delegates were all signed up before the campaign season even began. The clinton team has very sophisticated control skills. Everything seems to be about same same and nothing about new and nothing about democracy. I am old and even I am exhausted with the lack of anything fresh. And even if clinton starts agreeing to some of the more progressive ideas, she is not a progressive and I doubt she is capable of pushing for progressive ideas. I do not trust her. The DNC and DWS have pushed me out of the Dem party. Yep, after a lifetime of being Dem I am now progressive. I am not sure what to call myself. But if clinton is a democrat, I am something else. Will be watching for new vocabulary.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
75. I find that bullies are ALWAYS the biggest chickenshits.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:27 AM
Apr 2016

The best way to deal with them (in the real world) is to walk straight up to them and punch them in nose. The sycophants that surround them slither back under the rocks they crawled out from.

A similar MO applies in the cyber world.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
77. Bullying is the MO for BS supporters. Blame the crime on the victims just like the BS suit against
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:37 AM
Apr 2016

DNC.

Response to Playinghardball (Original post)

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
90. K&R
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:58 PM
Apr 2016

This tactic is actually turning people away from the Party which could its numbers actually fall below that of Republican registered voters.

Trump may have protesters now, but I have heard from many Democrats that the protests against Hillary will rival the 1968 Democratic Convention.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Dear Democrats: Stop Bull...