Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA President Clinton or Trump Would Be More Alike Than Different on Foreign Policy
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-wagner/clinton-trump-foreign-policy_b_9767984.htmlFor many decades the U.S. has vacillated between interventionism and isolationism, so the stark contrast between George W. Bushs brash engagement with the world versus Barack Obamas withdrawal from the world is not outside the historical norm. Given that the U.S. has now been in an isolationist mode for almost for 8 years, what might the presidency of either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump imply for the coming 4 years in the area of foreign policy? The short answer is that there is likely to be less difference between the two than one might expect, particularly given that they would face similar obstacles....
Impact on the Global Economy
Since politics do not function in isolation from economics, what would the impact of either as president be on the global economy? While global stock markets would no doubt prefer the status quo predictability that would come with a Clinton presidency, in reality, the occupant of the White House makes less difference to the global economy than the composition of the Congress. Since Clinton is far likelier not to want to rock the boat economically, those who favor more of the same would welcome a Clinton presidency. But would that be smart in the longer term? In the U.S., and globally, we are now well overdue for another recession. More of the same isnt what would be needed to manage that effectively, particularly given that the U.S. does not have the same range of fiscal and monetary weapons to throw at the problem next time around....
Making China Great Again
Of the many topics facing the U.S. in the medium to long-term, Chinas rise poses the greatest challenge to America on a wide range of issues, ranging from economic competitiveness, to international influence, to dominance in business. It seems clear that Clinton would be Chinas preferred choice, given her presumed intention not to challenge China too strongly while maintaining the status quo, but would that be preferable to Trumps approach?
...High Stakes
American voters should think beyond their wallets, short-termism, and what feels good when they enter the voting booth in November. There is more at stake in this election than any in a generation. The U.S. and the world face unprecedented problems, some of which did not have the reach and severity that they do today, such as the man-made risks of climate change, cyber risk, and terrorism. The same is true for some of the worlds most intractable foreign policy challenges. While both Clinton and Trump face the same set of constraints, how they choose to tackle these challenges is sure to have long lasting implications....
Impact on the Global Economy
Since politics do not function in isolation from economics, what would the impact of either as president be on the global economy? While global stock markets would no doubt prefer the status quo predictability that would come with a Clinton presidency, in reality, the occupant of the White House makes less difference to the global economy than the composition of the Congress. Since Clinton is far likelier not to want to rock the boat economically, those who favor more of the same would welcome a Clinton presidency. But would that be smart in the longer term? In the U.S., and globally, we are now well overdue for another recession. More of the same isnt what would be needed to manage that effectively, particularly given that the U.S. does not have the same range of fiscal and monetary weapons to throw at the problem next time around....
Making China Great Again
Of the many topics facing the U.S. in the medium to long-term, Chinas rise poses the greatest challenge to America on a wide range of issues, ranging from economic competitiveness, to international influence, to dominance in business. It seems clear that Clinton would be Chinas preferred choice, given her presumed intention not to challenge China too strongly while maintaining the status quo, but would that be preferable to Trumps approach?
...High Stakes
American voters should think beyond their wallets, short-termism, and what feels good when they enter the voting booth in November. There is more at stake in this election than any in a generation. The U.S. and the world face unprecedented problems, some of which did not have the reach and severity that they do today, such as the man-made risks of climate change, cyber risk, and terrorism. The same is true for some of the worlds most intractable foreign policy challenges. While both Clinton and Trump face the same set of constraints, how they choose to tackle these challenges is sure to have long lasting implications....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 453 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A President Clinton or Trump Would Be More Alike Than Different on Foreign Policy (Original Post)
mia
Apr 2016
OP
Stuckinthebush
(10,847 posts)2. Plain and simple..nuts
What a ridiculous article.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)3. I know! It's ...
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)4. Honestly
I had not heard that Clinton wants to abandon Nato and use nukes...my bad
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)5. Amazing the garbage Huff Post, Salon, and Slate resort to
to get clicks. It's like a badly behaving child that would rather have negative attention than no attention at all. I rarely go to those sites anymore because of crap like that.