2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt's the Duty of Every Sanders Supporter to Vote for Hillary
Look, I get it. It feels totally unfair that your guy lost. Weve all been there. (The election of 2000 comes to mind.) But cutting off your nose, and the collective noses of every American, out of a personal sense of pique is the last thing your revolution was about.
When Hillary and Bernie were in the Senate, they voted together 93% of the time. You could do a lot worse than electing a second President Clinton you could help elect President Trump. And then you can really kiss your revolution goodbye.
http://americablog.com/2016/04/duty-every-sanders-supporter-vote-hillary.html
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)We have a responsibility as Americans to use our vote to express our political choice and raise our political voice. The fascist days of going along to get along are over. What this OP advocates is fucking stupid, because it is obvious that she is stealing this primary when the majority want Sanders.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)pressbox69
(2,252 posts)isn't she.
rock
(13,218 posts)To collude with her to steal the election. Clever gal! That's what I like about her.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)Should be ashamed of yourself. Plus, yyguys should read the comments section.......
rock
(13,218 posts)Not even the GOPers.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)pandr32
(11,615 posts)Imagine what she will be able to do to Trump!!! (Bernie supporters want to have it both ways--the insinuation that she is evil and in collusion with some nefarious entity that MUST be helping her could easily put the silly idea that Bernie does better than her against Trump to bed. If she can rip off the primary from Bernie, she can rip off the election from Trump...ha-ha!)
rock
(13,218 posts)I'm not referring to the drink.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)To bad she said fuck you to independent voters
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)When and where did she say fuck you ti independent voters? As far as I've seen she's been relatively conciliatory.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)They have not lifted one finger to expand the party like Bernie. That in itself is a big fuck you. Just look at all of tbe posts on DU celebrating the closed primaries and her supporters take great pride at insulting Bernie supporters and indies. Way to convince them, or as I say., a big fuck you.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)You're conflating posters on social media with Clinton herself, just as many Clinton supporters conflate Bernie with the nasty assed posters on the internet.
Closed primaries were closed before Bernie announced. It's a bit much to blame Clinton for something she had no hand in.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Her staff, her surrogates that insulted a fellow democratic candidate and herself for her lack of trying to reach out to independents and allow their votes to be counted. Hell she and DWS had the debates hidden on odd days and times and she only agreed to more when she started losing states.
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)That Clinton is willing to change in the face of voter demands.
The insults I see as tit for tat, with the exception that Sanders fell for a media troll and called Clinton unqualified.
rock
(13,218 posts)On the above posts.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and voting for him did not require changing your party in a closed primary,
There would have been no contest.
I don't blame Hillary for that, but she got lucky. She would NOT have the vote or delegate lead she has today if he had always been a dem. There are more independents in this country than dems or repubs.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... by getting more votes?
How nefarious!!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Whether it's Hillary, or Debbie, or the DNC or the state parties or whatever, a lot of crap has gone down in the primaries and caucuses that have been held so far--and they violate my diner rule. http://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=37667
Sarcasm and denial on the part of Hillary supporters doesn't make anyone forget that. Maybe you convince each other, but I'm not even sure of that.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)your time and mine.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)The days of Berners and alleged Dems bullying other posters in this forum are over, much like Bernie's campaign and Revolution.
Now you have a nice day, ya hear!
merrily
(45,251 posts)what it is. If you consider "Please don't post a bs reply" bullying at DU, I'm the one who should be rolling on the floor laughing.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)primary.
I would not have a problem with it if both candidates got to explain their ideas to the public on an equal footing, and the majority of Americans made an informed decision to vote for Hillary. I would be disappointed, but I would feel like democracy did what it was designed to do.
But this cluster-fuck of cheating and deck-stacking by the DNC, the media, DWS, and election officials does not even come close to democratic. We have a goddamned banana republic election system.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... if he didn't like the rules?
He could've just run as an Independent.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)in the back.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and then his campaign took off and he refused to lift a finger to help the party.
He seems a little stabby himself.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)infrastructure they used it as a way to undermine him. Expecting any support, or even neutral treatment from them, only made him vulnerable to sabotage. They are openly hostile toward him he should have treated them as such.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Heres the truth. Youre right, I am the longest serving independent in the history of the United States Congress, the Vermont senator, who identifies as a Democratic Socialist, told MSNBCs Chuck Todd during a town hall Monday night in Ohio.
We did have to make that decision: Do you run as an independent? Do you run within the Democratic Party? He said. We concluded and I think it was absolutely the right decision that, A, in terms of media coverage, you have to run within the Democratic Party.
He added that to run a campaign outside the major two-party process, you need to be a billionaire.
The structure of American politics today is such that I thought the right ethic was to run within the Democratic Party, he said.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-15/sanders-yes-im-a-democrat-of-convenience
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)will continue to happen in more states as well.
Clearly that line of thinking is common. I wonder if in the end if he'll actually get any of the benefits he'd hoped for. So far, I don't see it.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and, there's no doubt he has a message that resonates.
But if he hadn't registered as a Democrat and instead ran as an Independent, he'd be battling it out with Jill Stein and Gary Johnson right now.
italiangirl
(60 posts)Y0u spoke for me, Thank You
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)by Bernie's camp. Every election in the primaries a new conspiracy theory was fabricated, from blue t shirts to rigging coin tosses.
Even in NY it was the voters own fault they didn't know the laws and didn't register correctly.
The idea that Bernard ran a clean campaign is laughable in and of itself, but add in the copy and paste barrage of lies posted by many of his supporters and it became filthy to its core.
merrily
(45,251 posts)When did Bernie's camp acquire the Des Moines Register, though?
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/caucus/2016/02/03/editorial-something-smells-democratic-party/79777580/
JohnnyRingo
(18,641 posts)"Order what's on the freakin' menu, don't write in choices you wish were available."
Remember that in November.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)1) Vote for Hillary
2) Vote for the Republican nominee who will most likely be Trump
3) Throw away your vote
4) Refuse to vote
There's only one correct option.
Choose wisely.
-none
(1,884 posts)1) Bernie Sanders
Slide the rest of the options down one.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)-none
(1,884 posts)Then she would fit in #3
salinsky
(1,065 posts)-none
(1,884 posts)She was conducting high security government business on that private server in her home. A server that was outside the government firewall. She violated the conditions security clearance form she signed.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Indictment Fairy, Unicorns and Ponies, Bernie Bros, one-liners that come from deep-seated emotion directily out of the mouth, skipping the brain, ad nauseum.
A good defense is not pulling crap phrases out of some southern bodily location. It's just, well, still reflecting its origination.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... yeah, I see where you're coming from, bro.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)That's called checking the record. Using the personal name, I don't like that. But I wasn't responding to name-calling. That's a different subject.
It's these corny phrases and one-liners that get used in lieu of actual thought or phrasing your candidate's views. This part is hard, I do understand that, because it depends on who is asking/retelling, and on what day, in which year, and in front of whom. And who wants to look silly and so yesterday.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It is how i interpret things that matter. Your opinion could not matter less in my decision making.
byyiminy
(39 posts)Leave the Presidential slate blank and vote downticket progressives.
JohnnyRingo
(18,641 posts)I was referring to people who think they can write in anyone they want and it'll be a counted vote.
Most states have election laws that prevent SpongeBob from becoming their governor. I actually read a post here where a Bernie supporter said he was going to write in his name and if more than 50% do the same, he'll be president. The fact is, those ballots will go straight to the garbage can.
In Ohio a candidate has to register himself in advance with an intent to be a write in candidate in order to be counted. All states have similar conditions for obvious reasons.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)There is a concerted effort to organize this, much to the Hilly fanclub's chagrin.
We are spreading the word that if you live in such a state, then you vote for Jill Stein. However, if you live in a state where pre-registration isn't required, then you vote for Bernie.
It's not a hard effort, but it's being done in order to signal to the Democratic Party that it's as fucked up as the Republican Party.
JohnnyRingo
(18,641 posts)It's been said that a good number of millennial voters figure they're well enough off to survive four years of a Republican administration in order to set up a run by Elizabeth Warren in 2020.
That ignores the tragedies that will be incurred by those not as well situated financially. Union members, the destitute, immigrants, and the LGBT community don't believe for a second that Republicans and Democrats have common plans for their future.
If your short term goal is to merely deny Hillary Clinton the election to send a "message", then I'm not with you. That's not a revolution, it's a tantrum. I could go on and on stating the major differences between modern Republicans and Democrats, but you've snorted too much Bernie Dust to see beyond breaking up a few banks as key to national prosperity.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... why did he register?
merrily
(45,251 posts)4. Stealing the primary ...
... by getting more votes?
How nefarious!
I replied2. You do know that posts like your Reply 4 that don't fool anyone, right?
Whether it's Hillary, or Debbie, or the DNC or the state parties or whatever, a lot of crap has gone down in the primaries and caucuses that have been held so far--and they violate my diner rule. http://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=37667
Sarcasm and denial on the part of Hillary supporters doesn't make anyone forget that. Maybe you convince each other, but I'm not even sure of that.
To which you have now responded126. If Bernie didn't like the rules of the Democratic primary system ...
View profile
... why did he register?
Please tell me you understand that your reply 126 makes no sense if one actually tries to follow the conversaton.
You may also want to check out this post, which I just happen to see in latest threads. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027790864
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... because "a lot of crap has gone down".
And, you think you've made a solid argument.
That's adorable!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Dang it all! I always forget to request that posters not lie about what I posted! I should have learned by now.
(Psst. FYI: Any post that starts with "So" and then totally restates, but mischaracterizes, a prior post of mine that I just quoted to you verbatim in Reply 135 a minute ago is a yuuuge tell.)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027790864
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... did I inadvertently disregard your link showing nine of Hillary's super delegates calling for an investigation into voting irregularities?
Sorry.
merrily
(45,251 posts)of an apology or at least silence.
(Psst. mentioning that the Party's super delegates who have endorsed Hillary are descrying voting practices that disadvantaged Bernie doesn't say what you seem to assume it does. Doesn't help your case a bit. Sorry you missed that.)
I thought your lying about my post was bad, but trying to double down with more nonsense really says more about who you are than I ever would. Thanks!
I am an optimist and hope you will do better in the future. Get back to me if you think you've improved.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... that's what quotation marks are for.
Sorry, I omitted mentioning your link to a thread regarding nine of Hillary's super delegates calling for an investigation into voting irregularities, but I honestly didn't even look at it until like the third time you posted it.
And, frankly that makes all of this even funnier.
Thanks for the lulz.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I don't care if you mention the link or ignore it. I don't even care that you've mischaracterized it.
However I am disappointed that you ignored my request to get back to me if you improved. (Psst. Doubling down on bs and repeating your nonsensemis not an improvement.)
I think I will have to wish you a great day at this point because, so far, not a single post that you have made to me has been honest, and now you've devolved into repetititon to boot.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Fascist? Seriously? Do you even know what that word means? Or do you just randomly insert it into rants along with things like "oligarchy" and "bankster" and "the establishment"?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Almost 50 posts a day, 24/7. It's great work if you can stomach it.
Mussolini once said, "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power."
Enjoy your paycheck.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... are you disappointed that Bernie only pays his trolls $10.10 per hour?
What happened to that $15 minimum wage??
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)You must be so proud of your career. I'm sure you speak of how fulfilling it is to your friends and family.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... Bernie supporters sure like that alert button.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Apparently whatever they tell you to say.
Good to see you value that free speech.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I don't usually pay much attention to post count, even on the big computer, but that does seem sooooo transparent.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)It amazes me how many so called Progressives come down on the side of war and environmental devastation just for the sake of having a female president.
You guys are something else.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)I take it you don't live in places where the groundwater is chemicalized to provide more fossil fuels. They are called sink holes. Like Climate Change, they exist. So I'm not surprised that The Bubble doesn't understand it.
No true Democrat can support that. So, there's that.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)This stuff isn't hard to understand. Fracking is dangerous and toxic. Hillary was asked if she would ban fracking. She said no, and rather provided a convoluted answer to the question.
She's not a progressive if she simply can't answer 'no'.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,532 posts)You are free to vote as you see fit, but I hope your choice is not just for spite.
Response to Android3.14 (Reply #1)
egalitegirl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)Uhhhh no
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... you mean like looking out for the welfare of your fellow citizens?
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)big banks and corporations who screw them over?
Broward
(1,976 posts)for the welfare of your fellow citizens?
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)much like corruption, lack of judgment, triangulation and flip flopping for fun and profit.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)my vote can not be bought, my vote cannot be coerced it can only be earned. My vote belongs only to me. To do with as I see fit.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... this is a discussion about your duty as a patriotic American.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but, I wouldn't recommend it.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)ages ago. Try and get a better shtick please, I'm sure if you apply yourself you can do it. I have no duty to vote, only the right to vote. As I fucking chose.
http://www.al-islam.org/principles-marriage-family-ethics-ayatullah-ibrahim-amini/part-1-duties-women
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/wife.html
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)This Duty meme is their new shaming attempt. It won't work on real women who know all too well how screwed we are when we do our "DUTY".
More proof ......
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and that is not her or Trump
dgibby
(9,474 posts)Silly me, I thought it was a decree.
As for duty, I served (honorably) in the US Navy for 22 years, pay taxes, and am available to serve on a jury if called. Voting, on the other hand, is a right, and no one has the authority to tell me it's my "duty" to vote for any candidate.
Posts like this are NOT helpful. They only serve to antagonize and divide. Although I'd prefer Bernie, I am still planning on voting for the Dem candidate; however, a few more posts like this one may cause me to reevaluate my position.
TM99
(8,352 posts)good Germans now and vote our patriotic duty according to which fucking authoritarian?
If you actually believed this dribble, you wouldn't be a fucking Clinton supporter. Ask us vets sent to war by neocons like Hillary and then get in my face again with your patriotic American spiel!
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... of catch phrases.
It's almost as if you really have nothing substantive to say.
TM99
(8,352 posts)You bluster in here yammering on about patriotic duty to vote for Hillary but we are using catch phrases?
You further yammer on like this but we are the ones with nothing substantive to say?
Fuck me this is comedy gold.
You ever serve kid? Or are you still in your pajamas sipping chai from Starbucks, posting on your ipad about how patriotic you are for voting for Clinton?
Ron Green
(9,823 posts)much closer to mine, and who is actually the nominee of a political party?
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... no, wait.
DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)They are anti democratic.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)pressbox69
(2,252 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Response to salinsky (Original post)
dinkytron This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to salinsky (Original post)
potisok This message was self-deleted by its author.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Bernie has earned my vote and I will vote for him in the upcoming California primary. If Hillary becomes the nominee, she will then have to convince me that she's worthy of my vote. That's how it works. It isn't my "duty" to vote for her any more than it's my "duty" to vote for anybody else. Votes shouldn't be "won" by arm twisting or coersion. And, please don't throw the words "patriotic American" at me. I was born in this country but if by "patriotic" you mean "my country right or wrong," you'd be barking up the wrong tree.
RazBerryBeret
(3,075 posts)for the person who best represents my biggest concerns with my country and my life.
NO ONE can tell me how to vote.
You can't bully people into voting for you. You can't trick them, you can't intimidate them.
This needs to be a lesson learned before the GE; this is NOT the way to win votes, for ANYONE.....
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Anyone who dictates to me what my duty is beyond what I just stated can go to hell.
Broward
(1,976 posts)considering he's more progressive than Hillary on virtually every issue? If not, he's a hypocrite and can shove it.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I used tomreqlly like him until he turned into a screaming madman about Hillary. And tried to shame people. Really what happened to the right to vote for the candidate we want?
If Hillary looses it as snthe DNCs fault. And largely if she is such a great candidate why do they have to invoke DUTY to get others to vote for her?
Broward
(1,976 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that will help us recover our lost democracy as clearly shown in this primary. It seems to me that those that bow to tough authoritarian leadership expect to be able to demand that we all do that. Homey don't play that game.
The Left has been disparaged day after day here. The most outspoken were gang attacked until they were banned. Yep, banned on a supposedly liberal message board. Now you demand we toe the authoritarian line.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)1) Vote for Hillary
2) Vote for the Republican nominee who will most likely be Trump
3) Throw away your vote
4) Refuse to vote
There is only one option that will fulfill your duty as a patriotic American.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)To fight for a candidate that will support the 99% and not Goldman-Sachs. Do you really think Goldman-Sachs and the Koch Bros will help the poor?
It's not a duty to follow a candidate that has accepted tens of millions from the banksters.
By the way, go lecture someone else on what you think is an authoritarian's duty. Bob-Bye
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)She simply does not represent me or my values. She very obviously represents and is beholden to Wall Street and the Elite.
Votes are earned, not owed..... Accept in fascist dictatorships I guess.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)It is patriotic to vote for the best person i believe is best for the country, this is not Russia.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)She's not entitled to any votes.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)time she didn't vote with Bernie I have a problem with, Iraq War etc. I'm not there yet on who I will support if Bernie loses the nomination. Bernie is still in the race and as long as he is I fully support him.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)that the more you (y'all) hector me, the less likely I am to do as you say? (Hint - that's human nature.)
Waiting with bated breath to see if there's any reply to this - nah, I'm not.
Actually, I will do as I please - much as I would derive great satisfaction from going directly against this post.
And what I please is none of your business.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)H2O Man
(73,622 posts)You have it backwards: it is 100% Hillary Clinton's responsibility -- and no one else's -- to earn every single vote, if she is the party's nominee.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Elections are selfish. Theyre not about the candidates, theyre about us. Theyre about choosing someone who will have inordinate influence over our lives and our livelihoods for the next four years.
H2O Man
(73,622 posts)of thought that holds that "politics is the art of compromise." That rigid belief demands that citizens should be willing to compromise their principles .....something that they are eager for others to do, and that they are willing to do for a dollar.
Another school of thought -- illustrated by the Sanders Revolution -- encourages citizens to hold firmly to their principles.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... has been dismissed.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Schools of thought are similarly bulletproof.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)when Fraulein Clinton does not win.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)When I opened that link containing bull-pucky like the nanny business and,
then, remembered your appeal to patriotic duty, the phrase "nanny state"
came to mind. So, I did a Bing search for "nanny state patriots" and
wasn't surprised with what I found: links to conservative and tea-party sites.
In essence, the link posted in your OP can be read as an appeal to pick Nanny Hillary
because she's more conservative than Bernie orTrump.
P.S.
Considering her reluctance to release the transcripts, I wonder if she's hoping
nobody had a Nanny-Cam running while she gave those expensive speeches.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)I have participated at Americanblog for many years and left because of the proganda and name calling there by Clinton supporters!
John and you are entitled to your vote and I am entitled to mine.
I will vote my conscious not someone else's perceived good or "duty".
egalitegirl
(362 posts)noted.
laruemtt
(3,992 posts)flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)...how about focusing attention on making sure that everyone gets a chance to vote in the primary, that no one be denied a ballot in the general election, that the percentage of voters actually voting goes higher. It is nice to brag about 10 million votes, but in a country of 300+ million people, there are a lot of other people who can be nudged before people start preaching to the supporters of other candidates, PARTICULARLY when no one has yet reached the magic delegate number.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... voter suppression tactics are deplorable.
That is why it critical to keep Republicans away from positions where they are empowered to implement such efforts.
But, closed primaries are fine with me.
If you want to vote in the Democratic primary, register.
flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)I'm not saying I won't vote for Hillary - I just think until we get a nomination, calls for party unity are inappropriate. I know that in previous elections politicians have "gotten out of the way" before all voters have voted, but if I lived in one of the later states, I sure would want my vote to count. (And on election day, if I lived in Hawaii, I would probably be angry with the general election called before I had cast my vote!)
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but, Hillary is going to be the nominee.
And, then you will have a choice to make.
To do your duty as a patriotic American ...
... or not.
Choose wisely.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)That most certainly is NOT Hillary Clinton.
leftcoastmountains
(2,968 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)No sale.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sure is a mark of Stepfordism.
Urchin
(248 posts)just because they make up a rule, you won't comply? Well, me too.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)"then you choose to cede the election to a man who will destroy every cause that Bernie Sanders, and you, once claimed to care about."
Bernie's position on those "cause's" align much more closely with what the Demicratic Parties position on those issues have been for decades. Issues like Healthcare/ Environment/ Education/ Income inequality/ War, than HRC's ever have. So many voters already ceded those issues to the way side in order make history (as I have read here and elsewhere over and over). It is all about the history...and apparently a "woman card" now.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)It's our party's responsibility to put up a just slate of candidate that adequately represents the people, not the corporations and 1%. When Hillary earns my vote, then and only then will she get it. I live in IL, so my ballot comes with multiple options, none of which would require me to vote for republicans, republican lights or right of center candidates wearing a Democratic badge as a shield.
Bettie
(16,126 posts)giving orders.
brewens
(13,622 posts)them that would make her a good president.
I suspect there may be some things like Robmey's 47% comment she doesn't want us to hear.
Response to salinsky (Original post)
NowSam This message was self-deleted by its author.
arikara
(5,562 posts)Way to win converts. Browbeating, belittling and stupid passive aggressive displays of smileys rolling all over.
Is it Brock's idea?
dchill
(38,539 posts)Get back to us after the Convention.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)Millions of people lost everything in the crash of 2008. Obama stood by and watched as banks stole millions of homes via mortgage fraud. No one went to jail, the homeowners did not get their houses back, people have not recovered. The banks are doing fine, though.
Hillary supporters did not care about struggling Americans or students drowning in student loan debt.
Now, we are being told that we must vote for Hillary to protect POC, gays, and Muslims from discrimination. But they didn't care about my needs, so I really have to wonder why they expect me to care about theirs.
I don't think that guilt tripping people in economic despair will be enough to get Hillary to the White House.
marmar
(77,091 posts)..... and then telling Sanders supporters what they owe Hillary. ..... You couldn't make this sh*t up.
byyiminy
(39 posts)My vote does not belong to Clinton. It belongs to me.
I can and will do something with it, and I'm voting for neither Trump or Clinton as they are essentially the same. That slate will be left blank, while I finish voting for my Senator and representative.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Which voting for Clinton won't allow.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Unlike some I am not compelled to vote for her just because she is a female.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)My duty is to vote. Not for who you tell me to. I'll never vote for Hillary.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Oh, I see, you're new. Probably don't know how to use the Internet yet.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)For me Hillary is the least bad choice, but better than Trump and the GOP, so that's my choice.
But others' mileage may vary....That's democracy.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Let them lick their wounds.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... I was just doing my usual Saturday morning blog perusal and saw this and thought, "Geez, the Bernie supporters on DU will get a charge out of this.".
I'll try to do better.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)marmar
(77,091 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)"... SWARM, SWARM!!!"
marmar
(77,091 posts)And the same opponent was involved in each of those cases. Funny that.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)*supposedly primaries are about choice
*nagging is not productive
*DNC rigged this, not me
*clinton does not owe me, she owes the country
*since 2000 I am no longer obedient, I vote FOR my belief
*it is a big country, we do not all agree
*I did not vote clinton eight years ago and will not this year
*I am not Bernie or Bust. I am no war, no fracking, no voter suppression, immigration reform, decent wages, money out of politics, and no more family right of inheritance.
*I do not get to vote in a primary until June -- these posts before I get to vote do not build unity
Rob H.
(5,352 posts)Exactly. I don't get to vote until next month, either, and these kinds of OPs are starting to really piss me off.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Many of us don't march lock-step. That's why we're Democrats, Progressives and Liberal. Lock-step is a RW thing.
She will Lose.
She will Never get the Independents regardless of how badly they portray Drumph up to November which will be easy because he is scum However, she will energize the RW base to come out to vote against her.
Then there is the potential indictment and the Wall Street Speeches..........
and the part where she needs to EARN votes, they aren't OWED to her except by the people she's paid for.
Bernie's fault? Bernie's Supporters' Fault? Be aware of your Faustian deal and
Bark At The Moon!
GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)He writes that "Elections are selfish. Theyre not about the candidates." and then begs Bernie supporters to vote for others.
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)and the colonoscopies and now the Hillary thing. What else haven't you told me about?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Besides, I am told my vote is not needed by many HRC supporters. The race is a cake walk.
MsFlorida
(488 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)Seriously, drill deep. Drill, baby, drill.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and for other Democratic candidates down ticket. This sort of crap is not helping them, it is hurting them. Two big Democratic Thumbs Down to this bad timing.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)FAIL.
trash thread
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel!"
Samuel Johnson
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)given in a different circumstance, something about relax and enjoy it.
Not me. I'm done with voting for the lesser of two evils, because I'm done voting for evil.
If she's elected then her supporters can take the blame or credit (whichever they prefer) for the continued slow erosion of things like Medicare, Social Security, and the continued increase in military spending.
If she loses, her supporters can be proud that they nominated the one Democrat who couldn't even beat Donald Trump. Something about taking responsibility.
Don't get her nominated and then demand that those who can clearly see what she is vote for her anyway.
Deb
(3,742 posts)30 years I have supported the D party, people like myself in NY helped Clinton become what she is today BY supporting her.
What did we get? A Senator that handed the war machine keys to a bunch of madmen. I knew better and she didn't? WTF?
She refused our pleas and protests, she choked, she didn't have the courage vote "no" when it was necessary.
Duty to my children and country is to never support a tone deaf follower for POTUS.
And I soo wanted her to be the "One".
There is no heal on this wound.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)Deb
(3,742 posts)no loss on my account
B Calm
(28,762 posts)support him.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and, make the right choice with the options you're given in November.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)for anything next Tuesday. Right now I'm not even thinking what if happens, I'll worry about that when the party elects a nominee.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)"...picking a president is more like picking a nanny for your kids. Except in this case, its down to two candidates, and one is going to get hired. Your only options are to pick one, pick the other, or dont pick either and let someone else make the choice for you.
"To take the analogy a bit further, lets call the first nanny Hillary. As hard as you try, Hillary just doesnt move you. You see, there was another nanny named Bernie, and you adored Bernie. But Sadly, Bernie didnt make the cut. So now youre left choosing between Hillary, who doesnt excite you, and another nanny named Donald, who is categorically crazy and hates your kids.
"Your only choice is to hire Hillary, hire Donald, or let some stranger choose which of the two is going to have ultimate say over the most important thing in your life."
With that in mind, my "only choice" would be, in reality, to stay home and watch my kids myself.
http://americablog.com/2016/04/duty-every-sanders-supporter-vote-hillary.html
P.S.
I wonder why "Sadly, Bernie didn't make the cut." The blogger didn't bother to explain why nor what he meant.
Anyway . . .
Go, Bernie!
https://johnlaurits.com/2016/04/28/this-is-what-will-happen-at-the-democratic-convention/
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Because he won't be on the ballot in November.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Are you the blogger's mouthpiece?
Anyway . . .
With seven months to go until November --->
https://johnlaurits.com/2016/04/28/this-is-what-will-happen-at-the-democratic-convention/
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)She has not earned my vote
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)I'm a Democrat because of my beliefs, not the other way around. I'm not simply going to fall in line just because some Wall Street loving warmonger has a D after her name.
Zell Miller, George Wallace, Joe Lieberman, David Duke, Strom Thurmond, and even Lyndon LaRouche all ran with Ds after their names at one point, too.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)"Zell Miller, George Wallace, Joe Lieberman, David Duke, Strom Thurmond, and even Lyndon LaRouche all ran with Ds after their names at one point, too."
Demagogue much?
TM99
(8,352 posts)made by rattling off these good fine Democratic assholes.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)...and the Queen.
wundermaus
(1,673 posts)I have learned my life long lesson.
Many of my fellow citizens have not.
I did not create the choice of lesser evils, you did.
Clinton or Trump?
Neither represent me and I will not vote for either one.
You, my fellow citizens will make that corrupt choice because you made it our reality.
Just like the the old days, i will "Turn on, tune in, drop out".
Have fun, y'all.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Can you tell the difference? I sure can't!
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... they voted in synch 93% of the time when they were both in the Senate.
93% pure is pretty good, no?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Humans and chimpanzees share more than 90 percent of their DNA.
Yet we have no trouble telling them apart.
(And no, in case you were wondering, I'm not comparing either candidate to a monkey.)
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Afterwards, as a private citizen making expensive speeches
behind closed doors to Wall Street, yet another.
Without knowing what is contained in the transcripts of those speeches,
measuring how "pure" she iwas in comparison to Bernie while in the Senate is
ludicrous.
afertal
(148 posts)Our candidate is winning! The Party is fine! Nothing for you here! Move along and be good little Democrat!
(Sarcasm)
99Forever
(14,524 posts)No-fucking-body, I repeat NO-FUCKING-BODY gets my vote without earning it.
Period.
And if you don't like it. Tough shit.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)And sure as fuck ain't hers, and if I was I'd damn well deny it.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Amazon.com has a bridge these Fear the Trump Voters can purchase online now, I hear.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Down ticket.
dubyadiprecession
(5,722 posts)I just don't want the s**t trump will serve.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Bernie Sanders progressives can show the world what they really stand for in the GE this fall.
For good, or ill.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)be ratified. I am sick to death of paying taxes that fund the US government's violent destruction of millions and millions of people's lives abroad. I have no duty to vote for a candidate who will continue (big, big, big) business as usual.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)The primary was rigged. We need to focus on the senate and House and forget the pres race Dems in Congress wont follow Hillary's ties to wallstreet and banks, nor Trump's insane ideas. Ryan will destroy this country if we dont win over Congress. The people will riot if she pushes for war AGAIN, or pushes free trade AGAIN, or fracking AGAIN.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Wtf is going on here?
As a US citizen it is my duty to vote but NO ONE tells me or anyone else who to vote for.
kaleckim
(651 posts)What a crap article, even worse logic. I, because I am on the left, owe HER something? Screw that. She owes me something. This isn't 1995, she has to earn my vote and if she doesn't (and saying the word Republican and going boo! isn't working anymore) I won't vote for her. Deliver the goods or piss off. It is amazingly tone deaf to lecture the victims of the policies she and her husband have supported that they must vote for her. Or, that people on the left should just shut up and say nothing about her decades of corruption, her hawkish foreign policies, etc. The left is a pathetic joke nationally, and working within this party will not change that. This happens every damn time. Some (usually mildly) progressive candidate rises up, gets people excited, they lose and then the people in that party that made the same crappy decision start lecturing people to support a further reduction in our living standards. Even more arrogantly, they say that WE are privileged and don't want to vote for her out of ideological purity. I'm sorry, but this mindset is a horrible misreading of the changes underway in this country. The people writing these crappy articles don't fully appreciate or understand how radically the country has changed in recent years and how pissed people are at politicians like Clinton. They live in a bubble and don't have any interest in seeing the world from the eyes of those outside the bubble.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)It is the duty of politicians to win people's votes.
It is not the duty of people to vote for a politician.
If Clinton fails in her duty, that is on her. Just like Gore's failure is on Gore (and when he has been asked about 2000, he blames himself.)
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Elections are selfish. Theyre not about the candidates, theyre about us. Theyre about choosing someone who will have inordinate influence over our lives and our livelihoods for the next four years.
Not sure if I totally agree with him on this, but it's an interesting take.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)He's also utterly contradictory in many places in the article.
TM99
(8,352 posts)as well so really, not an interesting take.
Voting is selfish but don't be selfish when you vote. Jesus, man, that is some deep fucking Zen shit!
Urchin
(248 posts)it's the Duty of Every Hillary Supporter to Vote for Sanders
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)And that should be all that a HRC supporter needs to say, too, but I think they fear how the vote would come out.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)I was taught what that gets you by my grandparents and mother.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)No.
Q: Do you think that a Trump administration would be better or worse than a Clinton administration?
Answer honestly.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)I have a little less use for Trump but that's not saying much.
Unquestioning is what you wanted. Vote my way or else was implied in your OP.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)That's exactly what I will do too.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Otherwise, you're putting Trump in the White House.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511874024
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Kilgore
(1,733 posts)Tell you to bite me. I will vote for who I want.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Is it my duty to whore my vote out to Wall Street?
Is it my duty to submit to the tender mercies of corporate terrorists who are crushing working class and poor Americans?
Is it my duty to vote for a candidate with a history of supporting wars that have killed hundreds of thousands - if not MILLIONS - of human beings?
Is it my duty to support a candidate who only came around to support LGBT equality AFTER others had bravely led the fight and taken the BS the Christian Right threw at them?
Is it my duty to vote for someone who used am unauthorized, unsecured email server so as to keep her & her husbands political slush fund-raising outside the auspices of government oversight? (And may well have compromised US national security in the process?)
Not just "NO" but "FUCK NO"! It'll be a cold day in hell when I submit to the wishes of people who don't give a rat's ass about economic justice and equality. Take your bullshit and go sell it somewhere else...
pinebox
(5,761 posts)"My duty" is to vote who best represents me. That is it and that isn't Hillary.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)own your nominee, stop begging us to vote for more of the same.
srobert
(81 posts)We told you all months ago. Nominate Hillary, and you will have to win without our votes. You seem to think we were bluffing. If Trump becomes President, you have no one to blame but yourselves. I fear the continuation of the 3rd way drift of the Democratic party more than I fear a 4 year Trump Presidency.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... that's an incredibly mature political philosophy.
It's unbelievable you're not winning.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)Who I choose to vote for is none of your f***ing business, thank you very much.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)voting for the shit sandwich known as HRC. Fighting for us, unless it's against the 1%. Yay Oligarchy!