2016 Postmortem

boston bean

(36,221 posts) Tue May 3, 2016, 06:14 AM May 2016

To those who say they can't vote for Hillary

Don't, ok, don't. No one wants to take the time to address the stupid. So don't take offense when people roll their eyes when you're stomping your feet.

Your vote is all you have left. Use it. Do what you want. Really! I'm not giving permission to you. I am in agreement with you.

Do what you want with your vote!

The rest of us will vote to make sure the first woman ever to be nominated on a major party ticket, becomes the FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT!

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

To those who say they can't vote for Hillary (Original Post) boston bean May 2016 OP

So your only reason for voting for Hillary is because she's a woman, got it. B Calm May 2016 #1

Likewise a vote for Trump because he is a man and he "knows" about the woman card, got it. Thinkingabout May 2016 #11

K&R nt NCTraveler May 2016 #2

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #3

LOL. I don't have to address this crazy shit! boston bean May 2016 #4

Then why start a post pinebox May 2016 #5

To let persons like yourself know, I don't have to address this craziness upon your demand. LOL boston bean May 2016 #6

Uh......someone sounds like they need attention pinebox May 2016 #8

Wow...thats so narcissistic. Katashi_itto May 2016 #16

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #10

WHAT Thinkingabout May 2016 #12

They are fine with this flobee1 May 2016 #7

Done. frylock May 2016 #15

Ok, but I will note vote for her Duckhunter935 May 2016 #9

Jury results, thank for those who served and further results, this one is gone Thinkingabout May 2016 #13

This is why the "everyone hates Clinton" here is a myth angrychair May 2016 #17

My goodness, but you're a busy little bee today! frylock May 2016 #14

She hasn't even been nominated yet, and California may well go with Sanders rather than the warhawk Betty Karlson May 2016 #18

B Calm

(28,762 posts)

1. So your only reason for voting for Hillary is because she's a woman, got it.

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:16 AM

May 2016

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

11. Likewise a vote for Trump because he is a man and he "knows" about the woman card, got it.

Reply to B Calm (Reply #1)

Tue May 3, 2016, 07:13 AM

May 2016

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

2. K&R nt

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:18 AM

May 2016

Response to boston bean (Original post)

Name removed Message auto-removed

boston bean

(36,221 posts)

4. LOL. I don't have to address this crazy shit!

Reply to Name removed (Reply #3)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:38 AM

May 2016

pinebox

(5,761 posts)

5. Then why start a post

Reply to boston bean (Reply #4)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:40 AM

May 2016

which calls those of us who won't vote for Hillary stupid?
Derp.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)

6. To let persons like yourself know, I don't have to address this craziness upon your demand. LOL

Reply to pinebox (Reply #5)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:42 AM

May 2016

pinebox

(5,761 posts)

8. Uh......someone sounds like they need attention

Reply to boston bean (Reply #6)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:43 AM

May 2016

I'm just sayin'.

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)

16. Wow...thats so narcissistic.

Reply to boston bean (Reply #6)

Tue May 3, 2016, 01:27 PM

May 2016

Response to boston bean (Reply #4)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

12. WHAT

Reply to Post removed (Reply #10)

Tue May 3, 2016, 07:14 AM

May 2016

flobee1

(870 posts)

7. They are fine with this

Reply to Name removed (Reply #3)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:42 AM

May 2016

The dem race is for dems only, independents are not welcome.
If thats the way they want it, lets give it to them.

frylock

(34,825 posts)

15. Done.

Reply to flobee1 (Reply #7)

Tue May 3, 2016, 01:25 PM

May 2016

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)

9. Ok, but I will note vote for her

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 06:46 AM

May 2016

Because her past and policies. No foot stomping, and I will not vote for her just because of her gender like you.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

13. Jury results, thank for those who served and further results, this one is gone

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 07:26 AM

May 2016

On Tue May 3, 2016, 11:15 AM you sent an alert on the following post:

Then Clinton will lose
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1887790

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

YOUR COMMENTS

This again, no, this is far over the top, a nasty reference and needs to be hidden.

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue May 3, 2016, 11:19 AM, and voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Clearly over the top and ridiculous.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Why was this alerted on? If you're going to alert, make your case, and be specific - don't just give some vague rant.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm a woman who is a Sanders supporter, and remarks like this really put my back up. I don't need the random misogyny on DU.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

angrychair

(8,702 posts)

17. This is why the "everyone hates Clinton" here is a myth

Reply to Thinkingabout (Reply #13)

Tue May 3, 2016, 01:32 PM

May 2016

Yesterday, Sanders is called "delusional" in the title of a OP, stands up to jury. Someone gives there opinion that "Hillary will loss" and a jury hides it.

There may be jury stalking on both sides but it obviously not in Sanders supporters favor.

frylock

(34,825 posts)

14. My goodness, but you're a busy little bee today!

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 01:24 PM

May 2016

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)

18. She hasn't even been nominated yet, and California may well go with Sanders rather than the warhawk

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 01:35 PM

May 2016

and Wall Street coddler you want to give the nod. The status quo is untenable, and we can do so much better than to nominate someone who confuses deadpanning national conversations on AIDS with "silent activism", takes three months to release a single speech, and may well lose to any and all Republicans in the GE over her abysmal polling with independents.

I don't care about ovaries, I care about policies. And Clinton's policies are stuck in the 20th century, and way too much to the right. What is worse, she shifts positions as often as I change my underwear. Although it didn't take me until 2010 to throw away something as skidmarked as "marriage is a sacred bond between man and woman" - and then remind everyone about it for the occasion of Nancy Reagan's funeral (may she rot in Hell).

Clinton cannot be trusted - with the top of the ticket least of all. Her coattails are net negative. She'd make 2014 look like a benevolent result!

Reply to this discussion