Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
111 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders campaign is a lead weight around the neck of the Democratic Party (Original Post) Renew Deal May 2016 OP
Maybe the Democratic Party as it were, should just allow one candidate to run. mmonk May 2016 #1
It would be much easier if they just selected the candidate they want us to vote for. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #7
No Demsrule86 May 2016 #44
Clinton kept going until June in 2008, despite similar admonishments Armstead May 2016 #49
But when he hurts the party by doing so... scscholar May 2016 #53
Issues and competition don't hurt the party -- probably help Armstead May 2016 #54
No -- She needs to focus time AND money on Trump Sparkly May 2016 #61
The issues won't be discussed in any meaningful way Armstead May 2016 #65
"The Middle Class Needs A Champion Who Can Champion The Middle Class Because Everyday Workaday Warren DeMontague May 2016 #89
Problem is its true -- plus the lower classes. Someone other than Monsanto and GS and their ilk Armstead May 2016 #92
Right, but meaningless poll-tested bon mots help no one. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #95
I totally agree...I may have misconstrued your post Armstead May 2016 #96
I was probably trying too hard to be clever Warren DeMontague May 2016 #99
All irrelevant. Trump is COUNTING ON YOU to Hortensis May 2016 #97
Like Trump is sitting on the sidelines waiting for the Democrats to resolve things? Armstead May 2016 #98
Nope, it's not a difficult concept. Trump is counting on Sanders Hortensis May 2016 #100
Sorry, life is not that binary Armstead May 2016 #101
The GE is ON. Hortensis May 2016 #105
No what is binary for individuals is what box they check in November Armstead May 2016 #107
Some anti-est Sanders followers always intended to Hortensis May 2016 #108
She can pivot now nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #74
What's stopping her? frylock May 2016 #90
She and Obama were in a very close race, AND she didn't contest at the convention. Sparkly May 2016 #59
She also wasn't anywhere near this far behind. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #71
he's winning if you want him out before it's over. roguevalley May 2016 #85
Perfect response Armstead May 2016 #102
Great analysis. Dawgs May 2016 #2
As opposed to the Clinton campaign dragging it's ball and chain of Wall Street... bluedigger May 2016 #3
It's not Bernie that's weighing the party down. It's the Party Leadership berni_mccoy May 2016 #4
DWS is concrete overshoes lagomorph777 May 2016 #93
Says a lot about the current condition of the Democratic Party, doesn't it. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #5
Since the Rs have a nominee now, Bernie has to concede before the convention... CrowCityDem May 2016 #6
Maybe you don't get this, but she's just an awful candidate against tRump. JudyM May 2016 #17
However polls show her beating him Stuckinthebush May 2016 #75
That varies - in this sample of 10000 reported yesterday he beats her. JudyM May 2016 #79
1000 Stuckinthebush May 2016 #81
He. Beat. Her. In. This. Poll. If you are going to pin your hopes on a margin of error, go ahead. JudyM May 2016 #83
I'm going to look at the majority of polls Stuckinthebush May 2016 #84
Useless convo. JudyM May 2016 #88
Indeed Stuckinthebush May 2016 #111
What utter purile and partisan BS. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #19
Right, since the repubs have a nominee now, Hillary has to concede before the convention.... Melissa G May 2016 #36
John McCain clinched the nomination in March of 2008 but Hillary kept a runnin' Luminous Animal May 2016 #67
You should add "Leadership" to the end of your title Android3.14 May 2016 #8
The Democratic party has shifted so far to the Right it needs a swift kick in the A$$ FreakinDJ May 2016 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #10
democracy is a lead weight around the neck of the "Democratic" Party. LWolf May 2016 #11
Cut em some slack. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #32
Bernie's attempt to get the Supers to overturn millions of primary votes Demsrule86 May 2016 #45
No, Supers in and by themselves do that, silly. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #47
She has 3 million more votes than him. woolldog May 2016 #60
Too fucking bad. It amazes me how supposed Democrats R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #82
A list was put on here today of personal info for supers Demsrule86 May 2016 #73
Are you suggesting that SDs remain anonymous: R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #86
In 2008 Hillary conceded a week AFTER the LAST primary AgingAmerican May 2016 #12
It's different this time around. ClintoN is ENTITLED to the nomination. It's her TURN. N/T leeroysphitz May 2016 #22
She was way closer in delegates...had the popular vote Demsrule86 May 2016 #46
She was trying to get those delegates seated to the detriment of the party Matt_in_STL May 2016 #68
And what do you think Bernie is doing to the party? Demsrule86 May 2016 #70
Trying to sway super delegates is courting their vote Matt_in_STL May 2016 #78
She didn't concede until a week AFTER the LAST primary AgingAmerican May 2016 #69
She was way closer than Bernie Demsrule86 May 2016 #72
Translation: 45% of the party is dead weight. n/t TCJ70 May 2016 #13
I might weigh a lot but, be damned if I am DEAD !! Hiraeth May 2016 #23
The entire IMAX organization just turned green with envy Fumesucker May 2016 #14
Hyperbole thy name is Renew Deal. cali May 2016 #15
Welcome back. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #33
Oh, now, now...please don't... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #16
If so, then can I suggest a nice pair of matching concrete shoes? n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #18
SMELL'S like panic, tho... n/t leeroysphitz May 2016 #20
GO BERNIE!!! OUR PARTY HAS BEEN CORRUPTED SINCE INCEPTION OF THE DLC & CORP CASH! ViseGrip May 2016 #21
Wrong. Biden has it right. vintx May 2016 #24
do you remember laughter? because Hiraeth May 2016 #25
I was thinking the taste of strawberries but laughter is better azurnoir May 2016 #48
strawberries are good, too Hiraeth May 2016 #62
Given our head count trend since the turd way took over, I'd say THEY'RE the lead Doctor_J May 2016 #26
Third Way is a lead weight around their neck. And it's only Third Way panicking. eom Betty Karlson May 2016 #27
Hillary's baggage car is a dead weight around her candidacy. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #28
Same mistake as 2000 DKM May 2016 #29
It's a myth that Nader cost Gore the election. That's been thoroughly debunked. riderinthestorm May 2016 #43
Boo fucking Hoo. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #30
Dumbest post of the day! morningfog May 2016 #31
The day is early. Give them time. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #35
Septugenarian Socialist Jew from Vermont SheenaR May 2016 #34
Maybe her dirty money can't buy everything... Yurovsky May 2016 #52
Well, she barely beat out Sarah Palin for that honor... Human101948 May 2016 #109
Sure, from a right-wing perspective. Broward May 2016 #37
You know that lead weight? casperthegm May 2016 #38
^^THIS^^ CharlotteVale May 2016 #51
Thanks casperthegm May 2016 #57
Sanders has done nothing but add to the party. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #39
The Democratic Party is sowing the seeds of its own destruction by shoving Arugula Latte May 2016 #40
DUrec for the very best reason of all...nt SidDithers May 2016 #41
Another bullshit OP, not worth any additional time. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #42
Well, we can all go away until the election is over. Vinca May 2016 #50
Boo Hoo, 3rd way establisment party is a lead weight around the necks of the American People. whatchamacallit May 2016 #55
Keep this sh** up and it only discourages people from voting. It is disgusting hearing this crap. michaz May 2016 #56
Lead Weight? Panic? BootinUp May 2016 #58
The DNC is a lead weight around the neck of actual progressives arcane1 May 2016 #63
You need better glasses. 99Forever May 2016 #64
The FBI is a dead weight around Hillary's neck & the entire political process pinebox May 2016 #66
She should ignore him. Stuckinthebush May 2016 #76
Maybe if the Queen lancer78 May 2016 #77
And a candidate under federal investigation is doing us good how? n/t Binkie The Clown May 2016 #80
He's trying to "bring the revolution" workinclasszero May 2016 #87
Having trouble breathing? Feeling a little sweaty? lagomorph777 May 2016 #91
You mean the person angrychair May 2016 #94
Maybe around the neck of the 3rd way wreckers who are destroying the party... Jester Messiah May 2016 #103
Yep. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #104
Some might say the same about Hillary's campaign. Blue_In_AK May 2016 #106
The Democratic Party has become its own lead weight around its own neck. bjo59 May 2016 #110
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
7. It would be much easier if they just selected the candidate they want us to vote for.
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:52 AM
May 2016


...Oh, wait. They did. My bad.

Demsrule86

(68,600 posts)
44. No
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:28 PM
May 2016

It would be better if the losing Candidate Bernie Sanders...conceded now. He has lost and can not win. The supers hate him at this point as do most Democrats.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
49. Clinton kept going until June in 2008, despite similar admonishments
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:03 PM
May 2016

It's called a primary. Just like Clinton, he has a right to garner as many votes as he can to either have a shot or at least influence the party.

Clinton can campaign as actively against Trump as she wants to in the meantime. No one is stopping her.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
54. Issues and competition don't hurt the party -- probably help
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:14 PM
May 2016

There's 6 months when Clinton and Trump will be calling each otehr names.Actually that's already started.It's goinbg to get real monotonous.

Having a primary allows Democrats to broaden its message, and actually discuss issues.

Sparkly

(24,149 posts)
61. No -- She needs to focus time AND money on Trump
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:28 PM
May 2016

while helping Democrats in Congressional races.

The issues have all been discussed and will be in the general.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
65. The issues won't be discussed in any meaningful way
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:34 PM
May 2016

Trump bad. GOP bad.

We're for women's rights, gun control, positive immigration reform, a chicken in every pot.

She can say that as much as she wants. She can buy ads saying how wonderful she is.

It'll go on for six months. People will get so damn sick of it before November a lot of them will probably sleep through election day.


Why not continue to actually have a meaningful discussion of the issues that Bernie has brought up before that monotonous slug-fest officially begins?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
89. "The Middle Class Needs A Champion Who Can Champion The Middle Class Because Everyday Workaday
Wed May 4, 2016, 04:58 PM
May 2016

Amercians Hanker for The Hunger of A Champion Who Knows That They Deserve A Break Today Because They're Lovin It When It's The Real Thing So Just Do It, America!"

rinse. repeat.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
95. Right, but meaningless poll-tested bon mots help no one.
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:03 PM
May 2016

Thats why all the moaning about sanders being in the race is disingenuous at best. If he hadnt been there she would have spent the past 8 months saying absolutely nothing, but paying beltway consultants millions for new shiny ways to say it.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
97. All irrelevant. Trump is COUNTING ON YOU to
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:06 PM
May 2016

keep the Democratic candidate involved in primary while he groups his forces and begins his attacks on a opposition candidate forced to fight two foes at once.

What's really new about that? Like mud after a rain, the troublemaker factions on both the far left and far right will always have to be dealt with as they go about their usual passion of trying to drag everyone in the middle down.

Isn't it nice to feel your resentment at losing the primary can itself have significance, even briefly and even if it's for Trump?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
98. Like Trump is sitting on the sidelines waiting for the Democrats to resolve things?
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:08 PM
May 2016

And like Clinton is not allowed to go after Trump until the primary is officially over?

None of that is mutually exclusive.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
100. Nope, it's not a difficult concept. Trump is counting on Sanders
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:12 PM
May 2016

to handicap Hillary for him.

Btw, that's why she waved Sanders bye-bye in the primary. She's too busy to let herself be dragged back by this bilateral chicanery if she can help it. And she is helping it.

I just wanted to let you know whose side you are yammering for. Bernie's effectively out of it. You're working for Trump.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
105. The GE is ON.
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:27 PM
May 2016

Trump and Hillary are on. Bernie is off.

Trump and Bernie's attacks on Hillary are on. Hillary's attacks on Trump are on.

BSer intransigence and cluelessness are on. Their good sense and and responsibility are off.

Yes, turns out it is pretty much binary.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
107. No what is binary for individuals is what box they check in November
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:33 PM
May 2016

The rest of it is sound and fury that is out of individual's ability to control.

People have a right to complain, say nice things....whatever they want. That's what democracy is all about. What a concept.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
108. Some anti-est Sanders followers always intended to
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:36 PM
May 2016

move to anti-est Trump if Sanders lost. Others did not and are just moving with the crowd.

Sparkly

(24,149 posts)
59. She and Obama were in a very close race, AND she didn't contest at the convention.
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

She could have, since he didn't have enough delegates without super delegates.

Instead, she personally nominated him, for the good of the party.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
102. Perfect response
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:20 PM
May 2016

It dos feel a little like Soviet era enforced conformity to the dictates of the Commisar

And they call Bernie a Red?

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
4. It's not Bernie that's weighing the party down. It's the Party Leadership
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:46 AM
May 2016

How many political positions have been lost under the current leadership?

How many people have left the party under the current leadership?

No one wants to be a part of a do-nothing institution as it currently stands. They want posititive results and the DNC has produced nothing but lost ground and compromise again and again.

It's time for change. If you want to understand the problems with the party, look within.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
93. DWS is concrete overshoes
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:02 PM
May 2016

If the party continues with the status quo, they'll be swimming with the fishes in a couple of cycles.

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
6. Since the Rs have a nominee now, Bernie has to concede before the convention...
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:51 AM
May 2016

Dragging it out through the rest of the primaries is bad enough, since it puts the party behind the eight-ball in getting the general election fundraising and framework put in place, but if he actually tries to drag it out through July and take the nomination away, that would be another month of needless distraction that takes away time and energy from attacking Trump. It would be reckless, inexcusable, and at least to me unforgivable.

Stuckinthebush

(10,845 posts)
84. I'm going to look at the majority of polls
Wed May 4, 2016, 03:11 PM
May 2016
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

She beats trump. I understand your desire to look at the one that is within the MOE. That supports your position. If the average of polls agreed with you then I'd be worried.

But it really is academic, isn't it? Sanders has lost the nomination. He has no viable path. It's over. So, you and I had better work our asses off for Hillary. I suspect we both will

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
19. What utter purile and partisan BS.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:16 AM
May 2016

I'm sorry that inevitable has to work within the Democratic process.

Melissa G

(10,170 posts)
36. Right, since the repubs have a nominee now, Hillary has to concede before the convention....
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:47 AM
May 2016

Bernie polls much better than Hillary in the GE and against Trump and esp Kasich where Hillary would lose. Bernie is not under the threat of indictment and does not have the extremely High Negatives that Hillary does- not to mention the FBI widening it's investigation to the Clinton Foundation.

If she actually tries to drag it out through and take the nomination away, that would be another month of needless distraction that takes away time and energy from attacking Trump. It would be reckless, inexcusable, and at least to me unforgivable.

Yeah, I am sure her supporters are going to agree to this.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
9. The Democratic party has shifted so far to the Right it needs a swift kick in the A$$
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:00 AM
May 2016
People Before Money: Politicians are there to serve the people, not big donors. Clean money laws should be passed and enforced immediately. All parties and Independent candidates should be rewarded for running clean money campaigns
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/9/658017/-

Response to Renew Deal (Original post)

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
32. Cut em some slack.
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:43 AM
May 2016

Democracy is hard.

Subverting the democratic process is harder. Lee Atwater's art wasn't created in a day.

Demsrule86

(68,600 posts)
45. Bernie's attempt to get the Supers to overturn millions of primary votes
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:31 PM
May 2016

subverts the democratic party...he wants a win he certainly did not earn. Makes him look hypocritical.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
60. She has 3 million more votes than him.
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

She's prohibitively ahead of him regardless of the superdelegate system. It's over.

Demsrule86

(68,600 posts)
73. A list was put on here today of personal info for supers
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:40 PM
May 2016

So Bernie types could call and pressure Supers...won't work...Bernie needs to go.

Demsrule86

(68,600 posts)
46. She was way closer in delegates...had the popular vote
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:33 PM
May 2016

and was trying to get the Florida and Michigan delegates seated...they were penalized by the DNC. Bernie says he will go to the convention...which would make him as good as a trump supporter.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
68. She was trying to get those delegates seated to the detriment of the party
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:40 PM
May 2016

She had agreed they would not be seated and ended up changing her mind when she saw an opportunity to claim delegates. That whole mess gave the party a black eye and it was all her doing.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
78. Trying to sway super delegates is courting their vote
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:44 PM
May 2016

There is no vote to overturn as they have not voted yet. Maybe you don't understand how super delegates work?

Demsrule86

(68,600 posts)
72. She was way closer than Bernie
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:38 PM
May 2016

And she was trying to seat the banned delegates...sort of like Bernie trying to get the supers to award him the nomination...because he so great...not.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
24. Wrong. Biden has it right.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:22 AM
May 2016

Not sure what Hillary's cheerleaders are thinking when they insist he is hurting the party.

Probably aren't thinking at all ...

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
26. Given our head count trend since the turd way took over, I'd say THEY'RE the lead
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:10 AM
May 2016

weight. If you really want liberals and liberalism out of the party, then stop telling them they have to vote for Hillary.

DKM

(5 posts)
29. Same mistake as 2000
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:16 AM
May 2016

Anyone who is bringing up Wall St. connections as far as Hillary is concerned is no better than the Bengazi addicts. The fact is that the press hates the Clintons and has pushed everything that can be construed as negative toward the Clintons irregardless of accuracy. Bernie makes money from speeches, and I'll guarantee his speaking fee is going up as soon as the campaign is over.

Looking at some of the responses here tells me that the Republican propaganda is working. The fact that must be faced is that if someone does not vote for the Democratic nominee they are voting for Donald Trump. If they are not going to vote they need to put a "Trump for President" hat on. If they are going to vote for a third party, they should just go and vote for Trump.

In 2000, several hundred thousand people who followed the press script of "Clinton fatigue" or who disagreed with Clinton on one or two issues voted for Nader. Those Nader voters are directly responsible for the election of George Bush and the hundreds of thousands of deaths in the Middle East. You may not like NAFTA, but I'd much rather have had NAFTA, President Gore, no war, no ISIS and a million more people alive and uninjured than have had what we got because some people engaged in electoral petulance.

The fact is it may be Bernie vs. Trump, it will probably be Hillary vs. Trump, and you either vote for Bernie/Hillary or you vote for Trump, that's it, that's what you're choosing. The last time people didn't vote for a Democrat because they weren't getting 100% of what they wanted it cost a great deal in human life and suffering. People are talking about making the exact same mistake here, and it's got to stop. "You can't always get what you want, but if you try, you get what you need".

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
43. It's a myth that Nader cost Gore the election. That's been thoroughly debunked.
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:25 PM
May 2016
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth

http://disinfo.com/2010/11/debunked-the-myth-that-ralph-nader-cost-al-gore-the-2000-election/

Gore is entirely to blame for 2000. He ran a bad campaign, even losing his home state. He wouldn't let Clinton campaign, not even in Arkansas (which Gore also lost).

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
34. Septugenarian Socialist Jew from Vermont
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:45 AM
May 2016

has won 20 contests against the most well known woman in the world. I'd panic.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
52. Maybe her dirty money can't buy everything...
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

it sure as hell cant buy my support, unless she gives it all back and declares war on the corporations bankrolling her.

Chances of that happening? Less than zero...

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
109. Well, she barely beat out Sarah Palin for that honor...
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:52 PM
May 2016

I guess there isn;t any quality aspect of that contest?

casperthegm

(643 posts)
38. You know that lead weight?
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:54 AM
May 2016

It ain't Bernie.

What could it be? How about the fact that the Democratic party continues to shrink- down to 29% of voters now? Or that fracking is now ok? Or support of bad trade deals that send jobs overseas? Or embracing Walls Street and opposing Glass Steagall? Or supporting regime change and no-fly zones? Or opposing healthcare for all? Or opposing free college for all? Or talking down to the supporters of Bernie, calling them naive, wanting free stuff, and that Bernie is a one issue candidate that should "tone it down."

Sorry, I think it might be time for the party to look in the mirror and see if these issues, all of which are embraced by the GOP, might actually be that lead weight that you are referring to...

casperthegm

(643 posts)
57. Thanks
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:25 PM
May 2016

Problem is, how do we get the HRC supporters to realize what is happening? They say Bernie supporters are drinking the kool aid, yet they can't even see their own ship is sinking all around them while they are so focused on getting their inevitable candidate elected...

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
39. Sanders has done nothing but add to the party.
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016

That's gratitude for you.

And I say that as a Dem for 40+ years, and having watched Sanders' career ever since he came to Washington circa 1990, caucusing and voting with Dems that whole time. Just who do you think you're talking to?

Sanders is my candidate, he's running in the Dem party, and I expect nothing but cooperation from the party I belong to.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
40. The Democratic Party is sowing the seeds of its own destruction by shoving
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:13 PM
May 2016

terrible DINO Wall St. candidates down our throats.

Vinca

(50,279 posts)
50. Well, we can all go away until the election is over.
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:06 PM
May 2016

I mean all the way away as in far away from pulling the lever on election day. Hillary needs us to win. It's a shame her supporters don't realize that.

michaz

(1,352 posts)
56. Keep this sh** up and it only discourages people from voting. It is disgusting hearing this crap.
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:18 PM
May 2016

I and everyone else have a right to their opinion and their damn vote! But to see this kind of bull is beyond sickening! Sanders' campaign is not a dead weight around the Democratic Party's neck. He has every right to continue just as Clinton has done in the past. This needs to stop before this site ends up being nothing more than a good place to post crap.

BootinUp

(47,165 posts)
58. Lead Weight? Panic?
Wed May 4, 2016, 01:25 PM
May 2016

It is neither. Bernie Sanders campaign will continue to make noise all the way to the convention. I would say it is like a noisemaker tied to your car. It will not slow the car down. It will draw more attention to the car.

The Clinton campaign will not aggressively battle Sanders, they have already beaten him.

Stuckinthebush

(10,845 posts)
76. She should ignore him.
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:43 PM
May 2016

Like most of us are doing now.

He is finished. She knows this. She should be kind to him and his supporters but focus on Trump.

 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
77. Maybe if the Queen
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:43 PM
May 2016

had not been jammed down our throats from the beginning, Sanders wouldn't have had so much support to campaign for this long.

Maybe next time, the DNC will allow other people to run.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
87. He's trying to "bring the revolution"
Wed May 4, 2016, 03:19 PM
May 2016

If he doesn't get the supers he thinks hes entitled to.

And he ain't getting them.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
91. Having trouble breathing? Feeling a little sweaty?
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:01 PM
May 2016

Thank you for acknowledging that Sanders has "gravitas" that your candidate lacks.

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
94. You mean the person
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:03 PM
May 2016

*That has caucused and done fund-raising with Democrats in Congress for 25+ years and one of the most liberal voting records in Congress?

*You mean the only Democratic or teapublican presidential candidate in the 2016 race that has had a 100% rating from PP and NARAL for 20 years straight?

*You mean the only Democratic or teapublican presidential candidate in the 2016 race that has had a 100% rating from The Human Right Campaign for 16 years in a row.

*You mean the co-founder and pass chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
103. Maybe around the neck of the 3rd way wreckers who are destroying the party...
Wed May 4, 2016, 05:25 PM
May 2016

Which, y'know... hell with 'em.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
110. The Democratic Party has become its own lead weight around its own neck.
Wed May 4, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

Many actors profited off the transformation of the Democratic party into a pro-corporate entity, the Democratic party did not.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders campaign is a lea...