2016 Postmortem

seabeyond

(110,159 posts) Wed May 4, 2016, 07:11 PM May 2016

Tad Devine says "We do not accept that version of reality".

Now we know where Sanders supporters get their "reality" from. What a hoot.

Tad Devine was just on MSNBC, and replied to the interviewer's question about the reality of Sander's chances to win the nomination with (and I swear I'm not making this up) with "We do not accept that version of reality".
And there you have it.

I’ll put a transcript up when it becomes available. He just said that live about 15 minutes ago.

I think the interviewer was too shocked to ask the obvious question ‘So, you’re saying there are different versions of reality?”

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/05/04/1523071/-Tad-Devine-says-Not-according-to-OUR-version-of-reality

http://www.msnbc.com/tamron-hall/watch/sanders-campaign-it-isn-t-over-679222339874

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tad Devine says "We do not accept that version of reality". (Original Post) seabeyond May 2016 OP

I believe there ARE many different versions of reality. dchill May 2016 #1

There definitely are, and in case you haven't noticed, the Hillary Group has one, the Sanders folk highprincipleswork May 2016 #2

in other words, he acknowledges that is IT a reality lol nt msongs May 2016 #3

And that's the very reason that Trump has a legitimate shot. We are destroying ourselves. Trust Buster May 2016 #4

Hillary's version of 'Reality' regarding Reagan's AIDS crimes: Bluenorthwest May 2016 #5

Yeah, there's a path, Tad. There's a path off a cliff. Beacool May 2016 #6

I guess Tad's version does not include math. NT Adrahil May 2016 #7

Tad is taking advantage of Bernie's, now chronic, insular nature. LuvLoogie May 2016 #8

There can certainly be different interpretations of perceived realities. Garrett78 May 2016 #9

dchill

(38,505 posts)

1. I believe there ARE many different versions of reality.

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:14 PM

May 2016

I've seen several right here on DU.

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)

2. There definitely are, and in case you haven't noticed, the Hillary Group has one, the Sanders folk

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:15 PM

May 2016

another.

msongs

(67,420 posts)

3. in other words, he acknowledges that is IT a reality lol nt

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:15 PM

May 2016

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)

4. And that's the very reason that Trump has a legitimate shot. We are destroying ourselves.

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:20 PM

May 2016

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)

5. Hillary's version of 'Reality' regarding Reagan's AIDS crimes:

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:20 PM

May 2016

She just makes crap up and delivers it with great certainty, for no reason at all.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)

6. Yeah, there's a path, Tad. There's a path off a cliff.

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:23 PM

May 2016

What a bunch of crock!!!!

Even if Hillary was only 50 pledged delegates ahead at the convention, she would still be the nominee. Super delegates are not on his side anyway. Why would they switch to the losing candidate???????

Devine just want to keep the money rolling for a while longer.

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)

7. I guess Tad's version does not include math. NT

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:24 PM

May 2016

LuvLoogie

(7,014 posts)

8. Tad is taking advantage of Bernie's, now chronic, insular nature.

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 07:46 PM

May 2016

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)

9. There can certainly be different interpretations of perceived realities.

Reply to seabeyond (Original post)

Wed May 4, 2016, 09:05 PM

May 2016

But suggesting that Sanders is likely to win a majority of pledged delegates, as a number of folks here on DU have done, is out of touch with undeniable reality.

The Clinton-Dixie meme was sorely out of touch with important realities and contradicts the fact that Sanders is the one winning the 'reddest' states in the US.

Last night, a thread was started claiming there were no headlines about Sanders winning Indiana. Many people went along with the OP. All of them were/are severely out of touch with reality.

I've also seen Clinton supporters downplay the role of Big Money in politics to an extent that is out of touch with reality.

And so on.

Reply to this discussion