Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Halliburton

(1,802 posts)
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:02 PM May 2016

BREAKING: HILLARY'S FBI INVESTIGATION 'FAR FROM OVER'

The officials say these interviews were planned well in advance, based on what has long been known about their use of the private e-mail server.

As for where the investigation stands, these officials say it is a long way from over.

FBI Director James Comey himself said recently that there's no deadline for finishing it. Asked if the Democratic National Convention would be such a deadline, he said no.

No conclusions have been reached about whether any laws were violated in setting up or using the system, the officials say.




http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/fbi-has-interviewed-hillary-clinton-aides-over-email-investigation-sources-n568916

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: HILLARY'S FBI INVESTIGATION 'FAR FROM OVER' (Original Post) Halliburton May 2016 OP
yawnnnn niyad May 2016 #1
Your made up 'quote' is not in the short story about Judicial Watch you linked to. nt onehandle May 2016 #2
HRCs team is intent on keeping the "security review" story going Press Virginia May 2016 #3
Since when has the DOJ ever been interested in enforcing actual laws? villager May 2016 #6
We no longer have the rule of law in this country Dragonfli May 2016 #10
"The law is for thee, not me." nt villager May 2016 #11
...! KoKo May 2016 #24
Hope springs eternal... and there's still the Russian hacker. procon May 2016 #4
perhaps you should read this: niyad May 2016 #5
WOW, ALL CAPS, MUST BE VERY IMPORTANT. NT Sheepshank May 2016 #7
We in the reality-based community know this is true farleftlib May 2016 #8
Didn't Pete Williams Get Demoted For His Lies? Grassy Knoll May 2016 #9
You're thinking of Brian Williams. DemocraticWing May 2016 #12
K & R AzDar May 2016 #13
Congratulations on being on Judicial Watch's side. JaneyVee May 2016 #14
Officials: Scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in handling of emails BlueStateLib May 2016 #15
What a "win win." It was either criminal intent or incompetency. Vinca May 2016 #17
This is the one area of law where intent is irrelevant. . . negligence is enough. pdsimdars May 2016 #20
kick! ViseGrip May 2016 #16
Why is this "BREAKING" ? Tarc May 2016 #18
'FAR FROM OVER' How ominous. Oh wait. You made that up. seabeyond May 2016 #19
In the article... Nancyswidower May 2016 #22
Ya, ok. And in no way conveys the same message as the title. seabeyond May 2016 #23
I have heard many people say the FBI has said it should be tied up this month pdsimdars May 2016 #21
 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
3. HRCs team is intent on keeping the "security review" story going
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:09 PM
May 2016

The DOJ is calling it a Law Enforcement Effort and has prosecutors involved

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
6. Since when has the DOJ ever been interested in enforcing actual laws?
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:12 PM
May 2016

I mean, the ones that might help the less-connected, and hinder the powerful?

I may be voting Bernie in the primary, but there's zero reason to trust the DO"J" about anything, anymore.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
10. We no longer have the rule of law in this country
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:27 AM
May 2016

Sure, you can go to prison for stealing food if you are a serf, you can go to prison for growing a plant even. But the rule of law only applies to peasants. If you are a high government official, a thug doing their dirty work (rape, murder, torture, kidnapping, anything really) or are a billionaire that profits those in high public office (stealing billions in money or real estate, killing people by denying procedures and medicines as the "gatekeepers of health", or imprisoning people for the sake of profit) you are above the law, the law simply doesn't apply to you.

Once when these same facts were true in a monarchy that made the same distinctions regarding royalty and serf classes, there were those that rebelled against such an immune royalty which were allowed to abuse the people, steal everything from them (there homes, their health, even their lives) and face no consequences. Revolutions were fought and promises were made by the victors, Promises such as the rule of law applies to all or it applies to none. Promises that now ring hollow as the champions of a fair government slowly over time devolved back into what was and what always had been, a system of an elite few above laws possessing nearly all the wealth while laws were used exclusively against their victims - the majority that go hungry and grow sick under the rule of that elite.


We have come full circle now. Now it is common for a financial and political higher class to never have to fear laws that would imprison any commoner and we are supposed to accept this, cheer it even as the lord of our castle defeats the lord of some other castle. But the bread and circuses grow ever more scarce. The illusions of fairness ever more transparent, and the cruelties ever more severe.

If we are to follow laws that do not apply to our masters. If our masters are given the fruits of all of our labors while we search our dirt floors for crumbs as they laugh in their mansions discussing ways to extract even more from their impoverished serfs. Perhaps we are less than serfs, perhaps we are dogs that now only lick the hands of the masters that beat us. Perhaps the dream of shared prosperity and happiness has finally died within our hearts and our minds.

Perhaps we deserve our fate because we so meekly, even proudly in some cases accept it.

[font size="1"; color="191970"](originally posted by me as an OP Mon Apr 21, 2014, 01:40 PM http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024852198)[/font]



[font size="1"; color="green"]*this OP was inspired by this one that went largely unread as well as what is common knowledge regarding the financial elite in the speculative and banking "industries" that break laws with impunity and the blessing of our government[/font]

procon

(15,805 posts)
4. Hope springs eternal... and there's still the Russian hacker.
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:20 PM
May 2016

Any day now... yeah, you just wait, it's a comin'. Pow! Bang! Boom! To the moon, Alice... er, I mean Hillary!

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
8. We in the reality-based community know this is true
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:17 PM
May 2016

It will be months before anything is known. I hope we have time to replace the worst
candidate for president ever before it's too late.

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
12. You're thinking of Brian Williams.
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:42 AM
May 2016

Pete Williams is known to be a really cautious reporter that doesn't like to report things without double checking.

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
15. Officials: Scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in handling of emails
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:47 AM
May 2016

It all depends on her intent


Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found scant evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-prosecutors-in-virginia-assisting-in-clinton-email-probe/2016/05/05/f0277faa-12f0-11e6-81b4-581a5c4c42df_story.html
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
20. This is the one area of law where intent is irrelevant. . . negligence is enough.
Fri May 6, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

And she was grossly negligent.

 

Nancyswidower

(182 posts)
22. In the article...
Fri May 6, 2016, 10:19 AM
May 2016

"As for where the investigation stands, these officials say it is a long way from over."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»BREAKING: HILLARY'S FBI I...