Even the red state governments, because Republicans are such big fans of hers.

If she has such power why did she allow Sanders to even pretend he has a chance to win?

By beating him by millions of votes.

If that's your attitude, nothing anybody can say here will convince you otherwise

You might want to return to your other thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511933639

Sid

I've only ever been to one Hillary rally, back in 2008. Most of us have actual things to do with our time than stand around to listen to a speech. That seems to be Bernie's bailiwick.

Sid

we don't hear about the voter fraud. Fact is Hillary has over three million votes more than Sanders, it is We the people speaking, listen.

The vote tabulations were fraudulent only in the states she carried. However, the process was both righteous and pure in the states Sanders won.

from voter rolls, closing down the majority of voting locations that existed in the last election) would be more than enough reason for massive numbers of people to fill the streets in protest. Here massive numbers of people just can't be bothered to give it a second thought.

And cheating always seems to be just fine if it favors one's own perceived interests... and even when it doesn't favor one's own interests. There's a long history of that attitude in this country, apparently. Back in the 19th Century, a European wrote about his travels in the United States and noted that, weirdly, when Americans got cheated they would first react with blustering anger but then quickly that anger would turn into admiration for the cleverness and audacity of the cheater.

Seriously silly post.