Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts) Tue May 10, 2016, 12:16 PM May 2016

So were Pagliano's emails wiped with a cloth too?

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So were Pagliano's emails wiped with a cloth too? (Original Post) tk2kewl May 2016 OP

Oh, c'mon, that's a stretch! Human101948 May 2016 #1

Yes! She was working on her wicked Gung Fu moves when she wiped it like a cloth yourpaljoey May 2016 #2

I like it! tk2kewl May 2016 #3

Suddenly you got a BIG problem! yourpaljoey May 2016 #4

Human101948

(3,457 posts)

1. Oh, c'mon, that's a stretch!

Reply to tk2kewl (Original post)

Tue May 10, 2016, 12:20 PM

May 2016

Rosemary Woods poses at her White House desk to demonstrate how a single move could have erased the tapes, 1973. (AP File Photo)

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)

2. Yes! She was working on her wicked Gung Fu moves when she wiped it like a cloth

Reply to tk2kewl (Original post)

Tue May 10, 2016, 12:27 PM

May 2016

We've all done it.

"Wiped it with a cloth" will be a cool line for our
next chart-toppin' hit:

They danse danse danse on the dancin' floor
Looked so hot -- the crowd shouts MORE!!!
They moved faster than a moth being chased with Off
they wiped it with a cloth!

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)

3. I like it!

Reply to yourpaljoey (Reply #2)

Tue May 10, 2016, 01:41 PM

May 2016

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)

4. Suddenly you got a BIG problem!

Reply to tk2kewl (Reply #3)

Tue May 10, 2016, 01:49 PM

May 2016

How will you spend elebenteen dollars in royalty monies!?!?!

I called Jo Biden for his opinion and he agrees:
'This chart-toppin' hit SURE IS a big fuxxin' deal!'

Reply to this discussion