Some, the Bernie folks, will cry tears of joy.

The H camp tears of sadness that Bernie is the best. Weird, yes, but they now know Bernie is the best!

underneath. (An analogy, just in case.)

Ask anyone in the Beltway! The rest is just.... caramel ponies!

for, we manipulated reality (which they did, their error in logic was obvious) and now are working to maintain our reputation. They will argue that they made a "small" error and corrected it, because they are such an upstanding organization.

... SHOULD* lie about him

edited

All the wasted OPs on this subject.

Cognitive dissonance will make their heads spin.

No one falls for lies...need I bother to give examples? I cannot believe a human typed that.

"doesn't mean people lie about him"

Yes, but there is the actual video and article that started this thread though, which talks about lies people told about his policies. Look up, watch, read. I made it easy for you. It's okay to ingest information that doesn't just affirm your beliefs. Have faith that it all can withstand reality.

Makes them have a sad

... candidates even Trump, they have enough truth to bash them on.

From two days ago, from one of your fellow Hillary supporters

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511928915

Nakedcapitalism put out a number of really good articles on the Friedman analysis, and the horrible ways that "liberal" economists like Krugman acted in response to the argument. Krugman's really shamed himself this election cycle.

it's like only "studying" 1/2 of the Universe, as in taking note that it "costs" a person
$1 for a benefit/value there's no record of them ever actually receiving, even though they
do receive it, because that info is deliberately omitted.

What's weird is that media actually reports this shit, as if it has some "value" in terms
of better understanding WTF is really going on.

Telling the lies of the corporatists is most profitable for them.

And more money = more power. Endless cycle.

Yet, for a time we beat back the robber barons. We need to figure out how and do that again. And for good.

Thanks for the thread, kaleckim.

are in the top 5% make about $250,000 a year at the bottom end.

The top one tenth of 1% have incomes over $1.7 Million. Just removing the Social Security cap on income over $250K would raise their tax burden by almost $100K.

Actually, the threshold for the top 5% is only $166K and the funny thing is I bet most don't consider themselves "rich".

That being said, I agree they may have accidentally on purpose wrote $111K rather than $11K, or they may have meant the top 1%, not 5%.

If he makes a claim, he can back it up. His proposals are always well thought-out and funded. He never pulls factoids out of his butt. Read the "Issues" section, including the "how he pays for it" part, on his website.

So when I hear entities like Brookings, and Hill fans on GD-P, call him a liar or a seller of unicorns, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are liars, they just make it up as they go along and, like their candidate, don't care if what they're saying is true or not. They just want to do damage. Period.

What's amazing is that anyone could ever believe them on anything.

a bit too much. While it may be unsustainable per the article in the long run I think we should explore this option more, shoot, the amount we fund the military is unsustainable in the long run. I feel fairly confident we can figure this out.

If she was such a formidable candidate, all of these these lies against Sanders would be unnecessary.

Anybody knows that a "Cost Analysis" is not a thing. The real thing is a "Cost/Benefit Analysis." They seriously discredited themselves with this amateurish hit piece.

If the penalty were equal to the damage caused, these calculated errors would cease.