Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTeam Romney Rallies Around Carried Interest
Romney pays a federal income tax rate of only 14 percent on his income of more than $20 million per year because of two features of the tax code. First, capital gains on investments, the bulk of his income, are taxed at only 15 percent, well below the top marginal rate of 35 percent for ordinary income. Second, the income he still collects from Bain Capital, as part of his retirement deal there, is eligible for the carried-interest loophole, which allows fund managers to have their compensation for investing other people's money taxed as capital gains, not earned income.
...
But lo and behold, what did I see tucked inside the business section of Sundays New York Times but an earnest effort to justify the loophole penned by Harvard economist Greg Mankiw. Mankiw is a veteran of George W. Bushs administration. He is also one of the lead economic advisers to...Mitt Romney. And writing in the Times, he did an impressive job of muddying the water around a question that truly is as as clear-cut as they come: why should investment managers have the compensation for their labor taxed at a far lower rate than all other professionals? Youll have to read it to believe it, but Mankiws trick is to bring in the more sympathetic example of a carpenter who teams up with an investor on a real estate project that turns a profit. Under current law, the carpenters share of the profits are taxed as capital gains, just as the investors are, even though in the carpenters case what he was putting into the project was his sweat equity, not an investment stake. If the carried interest loophole were closed, notes Mankiw, the carpenter would be taxed at a far higher rate than the investor he teamed up with. Well, yesbut that's only because we tax capital gains at a much lower rate than ordinary income. If Mankiw is so bothered by the carpenters fate after the closing of the carried interest loophole, then he should be pushing for the equalization of the tax rate for investments and earned income.
...
*Update at 11 a.m.: Well, it looks like Mankiws defense of carried interest is even more eye-opening than I realized: Matt O'Brien, a former TNR intern now at the Atlantic, notes that Mankiw came out for closing the loophole back in 2007, when he used a rather different analogy in writing on his blog:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-stump/101381/team-romney-rallies-around-carried-interest
...
But lo and behold, what did I see tucked inside the business section of Sundays New York Times but an earnest effort to justify the loophole penned by Harvard economist Greg Mankiw. Mankiw is a veteran of George W. Bushs administration. He is also one of the lead economic advisers to...Mitt Romney. And writing in the Times, he did an impressive job of muddying the water around a question that truly is as as clear-cut as they come: why should investment managers have the compensation for their labor taxed at a far lower rate than all other professionals? Youll have to read it to believe it, but Mankiws trick is to bring in the more sympathetic example of a carpenter who teams up with an investor on a real estate project that turns a profit. Under current law, the carpenters share of the profits are taxed as capital gains, just as the investors are, even though in the carpenters case what he was putting into the project was his sweat equity, not an investment stake. If the carried interest loophole were closed, notes Mankiw, the carpenter would be taxed at a far higher rate than the investor he teamed up with. Well, yesbut that's only because we tax capital gains at a much lower rate than ordinary income. If Mankiw is so bothered by the carpenters fate after the closing of the carried interest loophole, then he should be pushing for the equalization of the tax rate for investments and earned income.
...
*Update at 11 a.m.: Well, it looks like Mankiws defense of carried interest is even more eye-opening than I realized: Matt O'Brien, a former TNR intern now at the Atlantic, notes that Mankiw came out for closing the loophole back in 2007, when he used a rather different analogy in writing on his blog:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-stump/101381/team-romney-rallies-around-carried-interest
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 737 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Team Romney Rallies Around Carried Interest (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2012
OP
David Engage America
(1 post)1. Treatment of Carried interest
The treatment of carried interest is one of the biggest problems with the tax code. The carry allows private equity managers overseeing an investment deal to receive their compensation as tax-advantaged capital gains instead of as salary, which is taxed as ordinary income. http://bit.ly/xsYfBg
As the Daily Finance's Bruce Watson explains The money wasn't generated from income that he had already paid tax on. Think of it as being sort of like a tip skimmed off the top of all the money that his company makes for its investors. http://aol.it/z9mdIZ
If you earn your living making managing investments should you receive special tax treatment over another taxpayer who earns their living as an electrician? I dont think so.