Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Sat May 21, 2016, 09:30 PM May 2016

How the NY Times Smears Bernie Sanders, Recently & Repeatedly

First, Do Some Harm: How to Smear a Disfavored Candidate on NYT's Front Page

The first sentence of the lead story in yesterday’s New York Times (5/19/16) had some surprising news:

Senator Bernie Sanders is opening a two-month phase of his presidential campaign aimed at inflicting a heavy blow on Hillary Clinton in California….

That would be odd behavior—a political campaign having the professed aim of damaging an opponent rather than advancing its candidate. The New York Times wouldn’t lead with this sensational claim unless it had hard evidence, right?

Well, you have to go to the seventh paragraph of the story–co-bylined by Patrick Healy, Yamiche Alcindor and Jeremy W. Peters–before you find an actual quote from anybody. And that’s this:

Tad Devine, a senior adviser to Mr. Sanders, said the campaign did not think its attacks would help Mr. Trump in the long run, but added that the senator’s team was “not thinking about” the possibility that they could help derail Mrs. Clinton from becoming the first woman elected president.

This is Bad Journalism 101: You come up with a thesis, like “Bernie Sanders wants to hurt Hillary Clinton’s chances of beating Donald Trump.” You take your thesis to your source, and ask them to agree with it; like any sensible spokesperson, they decline to comment on it. You take their no-comment as an endorsement of your thesis—and that becomes the lead headline in the nation’s most influential newspaper:

NYTHarmClinton

As a bonus, you get to make a front-page allusion to violence on the part of Senator Sanders, which bolsters the idea—advanced by phantom chair-throwing incidents—that the Sanders campaign is a dangerous menace. (Note that the story’s original headline was the less-inflammatory “Bernie Sanders’s Campaign Accuses Head of DNC of Favoritism“—which became the more slanted “Bernie Sanders’s Defiance Strains Ties With Top Democrats” before settling on the final smear.)

The real problem that the Times has with the Sanders campaign, I would suggest, is revealed at the end of that lead, where Healy et al. write that Sanders plans on “amassing enough leverage to advance his agenda at the convention in July—or even wrest the nomination from her.”

Yes, the New York Times has the scoop: Bernie Sanders is secretly hoping to win the election!


Healy is one of the Times reporters who wrote, back in October, about “Hillary Rodham Clinton emerging as the unrivaled leader in the Democratic contest.” The Times will not forgive Sanders for proving them wrong.

http://fair.org/home/first-do-some-harm-how-to-smear-a-disfavored-candidate-on-nyts-front-page/
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
3. In case you haven't noticed, the prevailing
Sat May 21, 2016, 09:40 PM
May 2016

Opinion in the media overwhelming
agree with this piece.
Are they all bought off by Hillary and Wall St? Are they all wrong?
Is the New Yorker in Hillary's pocket?

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
4. All media, *all* media, are smearing Sanders.
Sat May 21, 2016, 09:48 PM
May 2016

TV, newspapers, and the internet attacks Sanders at every angle.

We are no longer a democracy or a figment of a democracy.

 

Tavarious Jackson

(1,595 posts)
5. Already setting up the Narrative on why he lost.
Sat May 21, 2016, 09:52 PM
May 2016

Not Bernie's fault. Everyone else should have lined up behind him. How dare they be critics!

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. More blatant bullshit from the two of you
Sat May 21, 2016, 11:34 PM
May 2016

If that's the extent of your campaign (it is) then please just forget about staying on DU because bullshit like that doesn't last long here.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
11. Bless your heart ... in a few weeks Secretary Clinton will be the presumptive nominee
Sat May 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
May 2016

BS cheerleaders that can't handle that will be shown the door. I will still be here supporting Secretary Clinton all the way to the White House. What will you be doing?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
15. No. Trump supporters will be kicked out.
Sun May 22, 2016, 12:15 AM
May 2016

Just a matter of time.

This is Bernie Underground and after all H's skeletons are spilled out, the H camp will fold up the tent and go get behind Trump because he's more their style.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
17. Bernie Underground? You're delusional. Remember Jun 7th, that's the date Secretary Clinton
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:44 AM
May 2016

will become the presumptive nominee.

BS can go back to being the Senator from Vermont ... the Sanders supporters will join us in the fight against tRump ... and the BS cheerleaders will be able to go crawl back under their rocks, likely never to be heard from again. Fortunately the BS cheerleaders are a very small, immaterial group; just like the PUMAs were back in 2008.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
8. Thank you
Sat May 21, 2016, 10:29 PM
May 2016

for the post. Anyone who is paying attention at all can clearly see what is happening. I actually expected it to happen so I am not surprised that they are going after Bernie. There is no way the powers that be will stand for having Bernie. What did surprise me in this election was when the corporate media all pushed the false meme about what happened in Nevada. They had no evidence of what they were pushing and yet they pushed it. They asked no questions and never tried to hear the other side. They went with a narrative and the narrative was the same everywhere. They repeated the chair throwing claim over and over and yet had nothing to back it up. They smeared regular citizens not just a candidate. Regular citizens are now fair game to go after to take down Bernie. That is pretty scary.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
12. The truth about the NY Times has been exposed this primary system. It is not a newspaper. It is a
Sat May 21, 2016, 11:51 PM
May 2016

propaganda tool used to mislead and lie to the American public.

shireen

(8,333 posts)
16. and that's why i cancelled my NYT subscription
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:27 AM
May 2016

and told them WHY i was cancelling.

I miss the science and cooking section. But the rest of that paper is garbage.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How the NY Times Smears B...