of the bad perm club.

She's in a great position to extort endorsements from them.

Brock would do it, for a fee.

Not enough of them have spoken out against her.

Must be as a republican.

I"m sure she will get support from her 300% loan shark buddies....and Wall Street of course.

It would be interesting to see which cabinet position she gives DWS as reward for corrupting the Democratic primaries. Likely SoS which DWS would use, like Hillary, to enrich herself and claim experience for a run as president./

the primaries and caucuses of each state.
How exactly did DWS corrupt them?

The state parties run the caucuses. Don't make shit up.

They are not an entity unto themselves.

While there was a story in Politico, it concerned A possible DWS run for Senate.

Why do the concerned progressives so frequently link to virulently right wing websites like Truth Revolt? Is this where they go for news?

and a lot of other non-rightwing sites carried it to like mediate: http://www.mediaite.com/online/report-dws-wanted-to-paint-obama-as-anti-woman-and-anti-semitic-if-ousted-as-dnc-chair/

Truth Revolt and my question stands.

If the story actually had legs, there would be something more recent. The Political, Mediaite, and Truth Revolt stories all appeared in the same week in early 2015.

NOT a Senator!

Last I checked DWS is a Rep not a Senator.

on all the political obstacles he has had to overcome based on her biased leadership?

He was allowed to run for the nomination of a party he didn't belong to. Sanders was pretty up front about joining the party in order to exploit its resources and run for president.

State Boards of Election determine what type of primaries and/or caucuses are held, not the parties. California is the rare state that gives the parties some say in who gets to vote in their primaries. The Democratic party had the option of closing California to Independents, and it didn't, even though the Republicans did.

The DNC is so obstructionist that it is allowing Independents to vote in the largest primary in the country. Kinda blows a hole in all the conspiracy theories.

party's shenanigans and right-ward migration turned them off.

are not Democrats.

And plenty of Democrats were willing to vote for Sanders until he and his supporters made it clear that this is about Bernie and Bernie alone, not the voters, not the constituents, not policy, not the Supreme Court. It's about an entitled old man and his equally entitled followers.

Now tell me again, what obstacles did the DNC put in Sanders path?

We know this isn't about Bernie at this point. Hillary's next target is "entitled" followers. We now have the right wing faction of the DNC, and the republican party, attacking anyone who try's to protect our safety net and fight's for income equality. She is setting the same type of tone that Bush did before he tried to privatize SS.

Get out of here with that right wing attempt to demonize the "entitled"

it could be difficult.

I would take anything from there with a huge carton of salt.

you got the story from Truth Revolt. And it's still a 15 month old story that didn't go anywhere.

Who supports DWS?

It wouldn't surprise me if President Obama did as well.

... cite Debbie's record.

Lost a bunch of House seats, the Senate, 12 governorships and over 900 state seats while Chair of the DNC
Supported Republicans over Democrats in two Florida districts
Conceded entire districts to the Louis Gohmerts and Joni Ernsts of this world by abandoning the 50-state strategy
Supported a Republican retread for the Florida Democratic Party Gubernatorial candidate (he lost to Rick Scott, again)
Undermined President Obama's treaty with Iran
Shilled for the private prison industry
Shilled for the booze industry
Shilled for the payday loan industry
Blamed the voters for her failures



Yet still he came out and endorsed her. I'm guessing any threat was a lot worse than an anti-semite slur.


The alternative, of course, is that he's satisfied with those results.

Someone better tell him because he's actively campaigning for her.

And why do you give your candidate a pass when he shills for the military industrial complex? Why is that acceptable?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/bernie-sanders-loves-this-1-trillion-war-machine.html

muheahahahahahahahahahahaha

and no attributions to negative comments.

When was the last time deranged David Horowitz spoke anything true?

also changes the source.

They site the article currently in the OP.

Brilliant journalistic expose! One doesn't need to defend DWS to castigate those who dredge up unsubstantiated gossip and rumor in order to advance their political goals.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

This is not the type of article that makes a political party’s national chairperson sound like he/she has a future continuing in that leadership position.

If he's asked to weigh in on any FBI actions, I hope he remembers.

I hope she one day has to depend on Pay Day loans to survive in this world.

Since when has Obama fired anyone he has picked for any post?

Rahm Emmanuel? No.
Penny Pritzker? No.
Larry Summers? No.
Tim Geithner? No.
Bueller? Anyone?

What a bullshit story. And I say that even though I think that DWS has been a disaster as DNC chair.

I can't figure out if Obama's doing the Reagan/James Watt thing, where it's always helpful to have a lightning rod appointment who's hated more than you are and takes the heat, or if he's that intimidated by her fundraising connections, or if David WS and the whole personal network really matters that much.

If the job description is "get people to not like you" i dont think it would be possible for her to deliver a better performance.

Derp.