2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFracking (which Hillary has promoted worldwide) Destroys Rural America & Health
The Sand Mines That Ruin Farmland
By NANCY C. LOEBMAY 23, 2016
Chicago WHILE the shale gas industry has been depressed in recent years by low oil and gas prices, analysts are predicting that it will soon rebound. Many of the environmental hazards of the gas extraction process, called hydraulic fracturing or fracking, are by now familiar: contaminated drinking water, oil spills and methane gas leaks, exploding rail cars and earthquakes.
A less well-known effect is the destruction of large areas of Midwestern farmland resulting from one of frackings key ingredients: sand.
Fracking involves pumping vast quantities of water and chemicals into rock formations under high pressure, but the mix injected into wells also includes huge amounts of frac sand. The sand is used to keep the fissures in the rock open acting as what drilling engineers call a proppant so that the locked-in oil and gas can escape.
Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota are home to some of the richest agricultural land anywhere in the world. But this fertile, naturally irrigated farmland sits atop another resource that has become more highly prized: a deposit of fine silica sand known as St. Peter sandstone. This particular sand is valued by the fracking industry for its high silica content, round grains, uniform grain size and strength. These qualities enable the St. Peter sand to withstand the intensity of fracking, and improve the efficiency of drilling operations.
In the Upper Midwest, this sandstone deposit lies just below the surface. It runs wide but not deep. This makes the sand easy to reach, but it also means that to extract large quantities, mines have to be dug across hundreds of acres.
snip
But the effects cannot be hidden indefinitely. These mines are destroying rural communities along with the farmland. Homesteads and small towns are being battered by mine blasting, hundreds of diesel trucks speed down rural roads dropping sand along the way, stadium lighting is so bright it blots out the night sky, and 24-hour operations go on within a few hundred feet of homes and farms. As a result, some farmers are selling and moving away, while for those determined to stay, life is changed forever.
Quality of life is not their only concern. Silica is a human carcinogen and also causes lung disease, including silicosis. Because of its dangers, silica is heavily regulated in the workplace, but there are generally no regulations for silica blown around from the sand-mining operations. These mines also use millions of gallons of groundwater every day. Local wells are running dry, and the long-term availability of water for homes and ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/23/opinion/the-sand-mines-that-ruin-farmland.html?_r=0
msongs
(67,415 posts)powered by electricity generated from natural gas
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Clinton wants to frack, frack, frack for oil company profits which they split with her (for speeches of course). Her goal is to amass as much wealth as possible and her fans root her on not caring about those whose environment is destroyed.
Mammon: The greedy pursuit of wealth. This seem to have infected the Clinton fans.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)who live in fracking country (a lot, I'm a native North Texan) are in favor of fracking.
Go figure why.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)So...
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)If we started building it out literally today, in 10 years we could be talking about moving our power generation mostly to renewables.
Today, do you want fracking, or coal? Those are your choices, and pretending they aren't is a lie to yourself and to the next generation who will have to live with whichever one we choose. There's not a solution that lets you feel good about yourself and keep your hands clean. In the time between now and when renewables are online (which is at best a decade, and probably longer), we have two sources of energy, and you support one of them whether you want to or not. If you oppose fracking, you support coal.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Coal is not used the same way Oil is, sorry. One doesn't replace the other, sorry. A coal fired power plant cannot just switch to crude, sorry. Just as a car cannot run on coal, sorry.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It is. Coal use has been dropping as NG use has increased. And that means fracking.
(Obviously it's not replacing it in the same plants, but you're the one who made that up -- coal plants are going offline and new plants are NG)
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)You should really do some research before you further embarrass yourself.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)the house they built almost thirty years ago because fracking operations very near to them are lowering the property value and compromising their water. They don't want to wait for the value to get any lower.
DookDook
(166 posts)I can't believe that there is even any debate over this. When will these people realize that we're all on this planet together? It's not like there is another place to go to once we've wrecked this one. I can understand the evangelical Christians who think that Jesus is going to come along and fix it all up...how can anyone think that fracking is okay?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)but also mad at her for not wanting to shut down fracking sites?
It's hard to keep up sometimes.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)fracking for profits. She has been rewarded by the industry for her support. She has zero empathy for those that lose their homes or drinking water. It's all about greed. The Clintons have amassed $150,000,000 so far, not counting their Foundation Retirement Plan, and are looking to make more and more and more and they don't care who is harmed along the way. But I guess her fans admire that. Heaven help the poor if she becomes queen.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)should be required to frack on their own land, and drink the water.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)You have to weigh what's important to you, the environment (that will probably be more-or-less just fine for the rest of your life) vs a BUTTWADD of cash. Some folks simply go with the buttwadd.