2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCaucuses are harder to steal. Until we get a secure voting system in place - including how the votes
are counted, they are the only check on the system.
Not only are they harder to steal, but theft is more easily detected.
Getting a secure, reliable voting system in place is doable. So why don't they do it? The obvious answer is because they want to manipulate the vote.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)The Nevada convention pretty much proves you wrong if you believe it was rigged.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)Hillary won the caucus. Bernie had more people show up at the county caucus. Hillary had more people show up at the state caucus because Bernie's people were discredited by the credentials committee.
LuvLoogie
(7,016 posts)MattP
(3,304 posts)How many working people can take off for hours
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)If I cast my vote for x, and the system changes it to y, I have been disenfranchised.
oasis
(49,393 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Luckily they were stopped.
msongs
(67,421 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)I'm really enjoying this.
tandot
(6,671 posts)Follow the Bernie math ... and you'll see the light
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)tandot
(6,671 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)'Cause voter intimidation is rampant in a caucus.
Sid
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)If they don't know who is backing their opponent they won't know who to steal from or change party affiliations.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Much easier to steal a caucus. In fact, they are a complete mess in every respect. People leaving, coming back, not realizing they can revote if their candidate is not viable. All sorts of shenanigans going on. Look at the video from caucus locations in Iowa.
Joob
(1,065 posts)But yeah, there needs to be like automatic pay on election day or something, for a state.
There should be a law passed (at least for caucus states)
where you would be able to bring proof that you voted (not who you voted for)
and afterwards you get paid regularly for the day.
This would also encourage more people to vote.
I know people get all weird about other people knowing who you vote for but that kind of thinking will never progress any nation if you can't even discuss nominating a certain candidate.
That being said, there should also be a law that let's people vote without having to stick around for the discussion of choosing delegates. ...Which would have been people they met. But whatever. The votes will still help choose who the delegate represents.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)It's far easier for those few people in charge of counting and collecting "votes" to cheat.
Also, caucuses disenfranchise voters who can't afford to spend hours (like myself) to determine a simple primary vote.
You're just plain wrong.
brush
(53,795 posts)time consuming, intimidating even because of no secret ballot, and therefore undemocratic because of all of the above.
They may be fine for small towns in Iowa but for major metro areas, forget it.
Take Las Vegas, who has time to spend 3-4 hours on election day, then another several hours on a different day at the county convention, and finally more hours on a yet another day at the state convention just to decide the vote and delegate tallies?
People work, go to school, take care of family. That all needs to get done in one day with a primary where people can vote on their own schedule, and be done with it.
And if you've ever caucused like I have, you know there is a head count done after the crowd is divided into candidate groups and the time spent trying to persuade people to switch groups. That head count and it's accurate reporting is where the vote count can easily be . . . ahhh, under or over reported for each candidate.
Cheating can easily happen there, and then you have the other two days to try to steal votes, as was done in Vegas by the Sanders people at the county convention. They were thwarted however at the state convention and delegates restored to the Clinton camp who won them on election day. Justice was done, vote theft stopped.
BootinUp
(47,167 posts)Your posts continuously defy logic.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)They're opaque, much lower-turnout, exclusionary, and need to go.