6) It was trickery designed to oppress white males.

7) She never would have won if they took land ownership into account.

8) It's not legitimate because I promise you there will be an indictment.

9) POC are all anti Semitic.

Yes, I've seen all of those arguments made recently.

10) Trump Tweets!

LOL

How did I forget about their passionate pleas to take Trumps devastating tweets into account.

Now you can go tell people you read that on the Internet.

And we know Southern Democratic votes don't count.

Period.

You know where 3x less people get to decide the outcome of delegate allocation!

POOR BERNIE!

Had WA allocated delegates by primary vote, the campaigning would have been different.

Basic stuff.

.


There is a lack of parallelism and the contemplation to come up with appropriate items.


#3 and #4 fail, since these are arguments that I believe even you used against SBS.



They stand out like a sore thumb and detract from a possibly good post.


.

Wait for it--the swarm will be along any minute to "catapault the propaganda".

demanding to be allowed to caucus instead of hold a primary, they sued the State for the right to caucus.
So your complaints and criticisms should be aimed at those who made this choice, the Democratic Party of Washington. Oddly, Hillary supporters usually claim to be Super Ultra Party Loyal. They say it is Sanders supporters who criticize the Party. But this OP is nothing but a massive criticism of the Democratic Party of Washington by persons who do not think their choices are legitimate.

Of course the Nevada Caucus is fine because Hillary has won both contested caucuses in Nevada history, their Democratic Party established their nasty caucus system just in time for 2008. Harry Reid was a major proponent of going to the caucus system and dropping the Primary.

So basically both Camp Clinton and Camp Sanders have criticisms of the system as it now stands and both have complaints about the Democratic Party's choices. Common ground if you admit it.

and that's what it is. The caucuses were not invented by Jeff Weaver, bean. Do you know these things?
If you don't like the caucuses, tell it to those who create them. Blaming candidates for them is daft.

I think you have a rucksack full of snark and no point at all, the objective is division. The double standard you employ is neon bright.

If you don't get the sarcasm, move on.

But they should make it easier for other parties to get on ballots.

to be allowed to caucus instead. It's a caucus because that's how the Party wanted it. I think that's a stinking rotten choice. Criticism of that choice is criticism of the Party, even if you can't bring yourself to admit it, you are critical of the Party just as Sanders supporters are.

Once a contest is in play, the rules are the rules. I oppose all caucuses. But I want my candidate to win the game as the game is defined by the Party. As do you, which is why you are not upset Clinton won the Nevada caucus, two times running. Too bad they were not both mail in primaries. That's what Oregon has, Bernie won it by double digits.

Fact is Washington's caucus is the method of delegate allotment because the Democratic Party insisted upon a caucus. Bernie won that caucus, thanks to the Democratic Party.

My entire life I've watched candidates I support win or lose caucuses while I say 'that's a stupid and exclusionary system'. But it's also legitimate under our laws, it's how Obama got the nomination and how Bill Clinton got it. It's not new to this cycle. It's not created by one of the other candidate and clearly both of them have won caucuses. Hillary did not do as well in caucuses against Obama either. That was 8 years ago, all that time to advocate changes in the system and you know what changed? Washington tried to go primary and the Party sued to caucus.

And again, supporters of both candidates have major criticisms of the Party and of the process. It's common ground. Like it or not.

Those aren't necessarily bad things.

Bill Clinton scared all the Bernie voters away at the polling place... duhhh.

I wonder what the outcome would have been if it was an open primary.