"It’s worth noting that these Democratic lawmakers couldn’t actually oust Wasserman-Schultz"

Yes, assuming this process has even started for real, she'd have to choose to give in to the pressure or let the conflict over her erupt (further) in public. That's the question. It's not like she's an independent judge or someone in a constitutional position of some kind. She's the CEO figure of a political party. Her position is supposed to be representative and unifying. If enough of the politicians she represents and unifies turn on her, she may see that position is untenable.

I say she's going to be primaried out of there regardless. (And yes, theoretically she could stay on even after Canova decapitates her!)

If they want to win the GE is to get rid of her and her..shitcan both of em...

Frankly, these demands and the bullying from the LOSER and his supporters is long past getting tiresome. Bernie lost! You don't have to like it. Move on already!

Best wear your hip waders for the shitstorm that's coming.

How about her support for republican candidates in FL?
The fact that the Party has hemorrhaged seats all over the country under her watch?

Would anything be a valid reason for you? Or is it just about supporting your "team"?

Damn, Debbie. You might as well step down and spare everybody, including yourself, this turmoil.

She ruined the mid-terms in 2014.

and not the decades of Republican-lite policies.

(Wonder how long it will be before someone replies with examples like the ACA, completely unaware that the ACA is Bob Dole's response to Clinton's healthcare reform efforts.)

She's a problem, but not THE problem. THE problem is Hillary, and she will not win support just because DWS is gone.

DWS has done her damage, and at HRC's behest. Taking her out now will change nothing.

Bravo

It's kinda like taking out (over and over again) the #2 guy in alQaeda...

done most occultly and for the wrong reasons.

The damage is done. Screw the dirty dealing DNC for trying to have it both ways.

WE ARE NOT FOOLED NOR ARE WE FOOLS.

The DNC chair, for all intents and purposes, serves at the pleasure of the President when he/she is a Democrat. If President Obama is willing to have her step down, it won't be a "soup"; if he's NOT willing to have her step down, there won't be a "coup" to override his opinion.

like it was when he appointed Dr. Cornell West and others to the platform committee

Bernie has the energy and the youth (and a bunch of us elders also). If there is any hope of keeping this party together and improve it they need to stop pushing they youth out.

After our caucus a group of us Bernie supporters were talking about what was going on. One of the elderly men told us that the last caucus he had been to was Obama with loads of excited young people. The one before that was attended only by older people mostly over 70. He was delighted to see the Bernie supporters because it meant hope for the party.

If they want a viable party the establishment needs to understand right now that they need to open the doors. No more packed committees to keep the establishment in the hands of the older generations. No more selling out to one candidate before even one debate or one vote is cast. No more early endorsements - let the people vote for their own leader. And above end the power of the DNC and state parties to override the voters and NO MORE super-delegates.

If they want any party left this had better go fairly and recognize that the youth are here to stay. They are not going away. They will be here now and in 2018, 2020.

Open the damned doors.

And i would add: if pushing from the inside isn't enough to lift it out of the neoliberal hole, what harm in some hopping out to pull from the outside? If we can get it moving, I see them climbing back on.

just so I don't have to listen to y'all obsess about her anymore.

No one the age of a current Senator (average age is 63) says things like "...what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s head on". That is hipster millennial-speak if I've ever heard it.