To cough up his pst file. It should be noted that judge Sullivan, exasperated by the state departments inability to produce Hillary's emails. Told them to contact the FBI to see if they would provide them. The FBI promptly said no. That wasn't the OIG so you might have something there.

The State Department didn't say they don't have any of Pagliano's emails. That's because when you send an email, both the sender and the receiver usually keep copies. So there are some from other people's inboxes, and the department has said they have some of those. A few of them have already been publicly released already. However, presumably those are just some emails here and there and not the full collection.

When Pagliano finished his full time work at the State Department in 2013, he was supposed to hand over a .pst file that contained all his work emails. That hasn't been found. Either he didn't turn it over then, or it got lost since. So the FBI taking his computer away in 2015 should have nothing to do with that. If the State Department still had his computer that would give them another way to get at all his emails, but they should have had them already anyway.

Weren't there two companies that kept HRC's emails stored? I'm woefully dumb about
internet technicalities, but the word "cloud" comes to mind. Wouldn't they be required
to testify as well? Weren't State emails available to all of the employees at those businesses?
Thanks

You're thinking of Datto and Platte River Networks. But that's not relevant to this problem because they didn't get involved until after Clinton left the State Department. So for instance they have no apparent connection with Bryan Pagliano, who was managing the server before handing it over to them. So they wouldn't have Pagliano's emails, except for those he happened to send Clinton.

However, Clinton (foolishly) kept all her emails on her server long after leaving the State Department, so that's why it's almost certain that the FBI has recovered all her deleted emails. For instance, Datto kept copies of her server data in the cloud, and apparently nobody knew that, not even Platte River Networks, until after the FBI took the server away.

I flipped out about this a few weeks ago.

Because the Clinton instructions were to delete them periodically, and the employees of the server began to worry that a coverup was under way. So they saved the data.

We know that all the employees of Platte River were told it was Hillary's server, and to keep that fact quiet. We also know they kept the original server in their office (which was an apartment in an apartment building with no alarm system!), while copying the data onto a new server which was managed at a "server farm" in New Jersey. We also know that the employees at Platte River and Datto had no security clearances, and that's probably true for whoever was working in New Jersey. And furthermore, it turns out the server contained some emails with "above top secret" information.

Any employee at any of the three places could have thought, "Hmmm, I wonder what's on Clinton's server. I think I'll poke around." But if that happened, we'll probably never know.

and probably already have. What gross incompetence.

Tick, tick, tick tick. . . . BOOM!!!

Today has been quite something.

At the time, the unnamed adviser was working as tech security adviser to HRC, he was also employed full time by the State Dept in the same area. The report goes on to note that the state's tech section couldn't help with HRC's problem's because they don't work on non-state dept equipment, e.g privately owned servers. Finally, the State tech section didn't know he was working for HRC. The adviser was required to report all outside POTENTIAL employment to resolve any conflicts of interest and of course you can't hold a full job and work the same hours at a second job. This is fraud. So yeah the adviser has a problem.

it appears there's a systemic problem in STATE and probably other agencies. Staff are afraid to tell their leadership team that they're out of compliance and what they need to comply with federal records act.

He lied to State, never telling them about his other job.

He simply did not tell State

Nothing will come of the HRC email drama because of the BUSH email scandal which is truly egregious. take a read http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails

The difference is that all the emails in the Bush scandal were deleted, so investigators couldn't find the evidence to prosecute. Whereas most or all of Clinton's emails were deleted and then recovered by the FBI (so says the Los Angeles Times and others). So it's a very different situation.

I think those deleted emails will end up containing some very interesting things. In fact, one previously unknown email mentioned in today's IG report was very damnng for Clinton:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141465211

Sigh

that basically nothing Hillary said at the beginning of this whole thing is still standing.

Her system was approved by lawyers at the state department. Do we now just say oops to that?

After all, they know the IT professionals would then descend on her computer(s) and would see things she didn't want to have seen.

All those lovely State Department funds going from State to Laureate and then into Bill's pocket. Years worth of it.

...down for a few minutes or pulling the plug on it would not stop hackers?

for a few minutes. This guy was in so far over his head it wasn't funny.

You think she would have accepted anything from a computer guy that interfered with her doing what she wanted? You think Abedin is any different than Hillary? She goes around enforcing Hillary's law.

- hdr22 explicitly suggested to Abedin that she carry a separate device to separate personal from State.

- That suggestion was also made to Abedin by State IT - she rejected it.

- hdr22 raised concerns to Abedin about security. Abedin was well aware and did nothing

You may well be right about the enforcer role, but on the basis of what was presented today, the question seems to be how could hdr22 place political and technical trust in people who are so obviously unqualified?

His IT training appears to have been zilch...he was an amateur. Clinton didn't assign him the job of care taking her server b/c of experience...it was b/c she needed a loyal minion and she couldn't use Dept IT people or they'd find out about the server.

Thanks for the thread, Bob41213.

that he sent her any email which has never even been close to have been proven.