Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:10 PM May 2016

How Elections Work: A Few Helpful Hints for Bernie Sanders And His Less Earthbound Enthusiasts

...

When you are down by 13 points, three million votes, five contests and about 275 pledged delegates, you can’t really blame your loss on the superdelegates, who had nothing to do with any of those things.

Nor can you rightly lay blame at the feet of the DNC chair, even if the mean lady won’t just hand you the nomination and you want it so bad.

Saying that you have actually won more votes, more contests or more pledged delegates will not, in fact, make any of those things true. Even if you say it a lot, or in the form of angry tweets and Internet comments.

When your opponent has won more open primaries than you, it will strike informed people as rather absurd if you insist or imply that you would really be winning if there weren’t so many closed ones. Also know that 100% of people are fully aware that if you were over-performing in closed primaries, instead, you would claim without compunction that outsiders in open primaries were hijacking the Democratic Party and ignoring the overwhelming wishes of the liberal base.

Generally speaking, it’s just a good idea to remember that rules written years, sometimes decades before you entered the race, were not drafted just to screw you.

more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-womack/hints-for-sanders-and-less-earthbound-enthusiasts_b_10057430.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Elections Work: A Few Helpful Hints for Bernie Sanders And His Less Earthbound Enthusiasts (Original Post) baldguy May 2016 OP
Take the condescension and shove it. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #1
+100000000 jillan May 2016 #4
You better be careful, your making too much sense... dubyadiprecession May 2016 #2
Just like Clinton's supporters ignoring the server scandal. Fawke Em May 2016 #13
Sums it up. fun n serious May 2016 #3
Second is not the new first. hrmjustin May 2016 #5
Funny, no mention of creative electioneering. fancypants75 May 2016 #6
Sanders lost because he could not appeal to key demographic groups Gothmog May 2016 #7
275 delegates is the only real number that matters at this point. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #8
An actual plurality of votes cast don't matter to you?? That is the real reason why hillary.. dubyadiprecession May 2016 #11
It matters more to me than it matters to the process the Democratic Party established. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #12
You don't appear to know the definition of "plurality" PufPuf23 May 2016 #16
Keep on condescending, Blue_In_AK May 2016 #9
And if Hillary loses the GE, don't blame Bernie. rickford66 May 2016 #10
Oh, good. More unification! frylock May 2016 #14
I think the Clinton Campaign should have a talk with some of you Armstead May 2016 #15

dubyadiprecession

(5,711 posts)
2. You better be careful, your making too much sense...
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:14 PM
May 2016

Facts can be hurtful, disruptive, inappropriate and so on. There is a great deal of censorship here coming from the sanders group.

Gothmog

(145,291 posts)
7. Sanders lost because he could not appeal to key demographic groups
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:23 PM
May 2016

There were only so many mainly white states

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
8. 275 delegates is the only real number that matters at this point.
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:24 PM
May 2016

I'll wait to see how it all shakes out. What do I have to lose.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
12. It matters more to me than it matters to the process the Democratic Party established.
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:38 PM
May 2016

The rules of the game are just that.

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
16. You don't appear to know the definition of "plurality"
Wed May 25, 2016, 11:13 PM
May 2016

Plurality:

The number of votes cast for a candidate who receives more than any other but does not receive an absolute majority:
"his winning plurality came from creating a reform coalition".

If there are only two candidates in an election, it is impossible to have a plurality situation because one candidate would have an absolute majority.

What appears likely is that neither candidate will have a majority until the votes of the super-delegates are actually cast at the convention in July 2016.

The super-delegates have a secret ballot like all other voters but may state their preferences in advance.

I agree that Hillary Clinton leads now.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
15. I think the Clinton Campaign should have a talk with some of you
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:59 PM
May 2016

You're not helping the unity they say they need.

But go ahead and have fun. Hope you can still be so dismissive in November

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How Elections Work: A Few...